Talk:1864 Atlantic hurricane season

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

1864 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 27, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.magma.ca/~jdreid/saxby_gale.htm
- In 1860–1869 Atlantic hurricane seasons on 2011-05-25 02:06:55, 404 Not Found
- In 1860–1869 Atlantic hurricane seasons on 2011-06-01 23:07:04, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

I changed the target for this redirected article to the 1860 Atlantic hurricane season, as its previous bot-generated redirect target of the 1864 Atlantic hurricane season was just plain weird. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 04:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1864 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 17:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A quick read; I made one minor copyedit. Sources look fine, I checked for close paraphrasing and found no problems. Writing is good enough for GA. Passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]