Talk:Don Gault
Don Gault has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 8, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Bud Schwenk""?
Typo? --A bit iffy (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Don Gault/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Wizardman
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with the other FAs)
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done Cross-checked with the other FAs: Art Houtteman, Orval Grove, Nick Adenhart, Scott Zolak, Harmon Killebrew, Rogers Hornsby, Thurman Tucker, Stan Coveleski & Bob Feller
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Thorough check on Google in parallel with criteria 2. Cross-checked with the other FAs: Art Houtteman, Orval Grove, Nick Adenhart, Scott Zolak, Harmon Killebrew, Rogers Hornsby, Thurman Tucker, Stan Coveleski & Bob Feller
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images (None)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
I think the layout needs to be fixed.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 12:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Do you have a suggestion where to put the personal life info? I hate having that section in articles myself so I'm entirely fine getting rid of it, I've just tried and failed in making it work inside the article without it seeming jarring (I was also hoping to find later info on him so I could just use it as a post-career section, but no luck there). Wizardman 14:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- I guess it will go better if you remove it. I'm usually reluctant when it comes to deleting any relevant content. But it's a BLP and his wife is not notable. Also, we are discouraged to include personal info in a BLP in order to ensure privacy. So I'd not prefer devoting a Heading 2 to personal life with a very short paragraph because it will stand out in the article, but if you find later info on him, please feel free to restore the content. That's the best advice I can give. But really, I'm willing to rely on your experience as a reviewer. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, especially since there's nothing more recent on marriage or children, at best the source used is archaic. Removed that and merged the other note into his career. Wizardman 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, especially since there's nothing more recent on marriage or children, at best the source used is archaic. Removed that and merged the other note into his career. Wizardman 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- I guess it will go better if you remove it. I'm usually reluctant when it comes to deleting any relevant content. But it's a BLP and his wife is not notable. Also, we are discouraged to include personal info in a BLP in order to ensure privacy. So I'd not prefer devoting a Heading 2 to personal life with a very short paragraph because it will stand out in the article, but if you find later info on him, please feel free to restore the content. That's the best advice I can give. But really, I'm willing to rely on your experience as a reviewer. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class college football articles
- Low-importance college football articles
- WikiProject College football articles
- GA-Class National Football League articles
- Low-importance National Football League articles
- WikiProject National Football League articles
- GA-Class Canadian football articles
- Unknown-importance Canadian football articles
- WikiProject Canadian football articles