Talk:Linden Oak

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

2007

The plaque at the tree says it is the fourth biggest white oak in Maryland. That would be third now that the Wye Oak is down. The National Registry of Big Trees lists a tree in Virginia as the biggest white oak in the US http://www.americanforests.org/resources/bigtrees/register.php?details=549 . Is there a source for saying this is the largest white oak in the country?Rjones1 13:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I found several sources for the Linden Oak being the largest white oak since the death of the Wye Oak:

Oak: The Frame of Civilization by William Bryant Logan

Answers.com http://www.answers.com/topic/wye-oak

Reference.com http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Wye_Oak

Of course all these articles appear to cite each other as a source, so I am not sure now. Is the plaque at the tree dated?

Best regards

I checked again, and there are several plaques. One just says it is the oldest white oak in Montgomery County. One is from 1976, mentions Ida Mae Garrett getting the Metro tracks moved around the tree, and says it is the fourth largest white oak in Maryland. It also lists a height of 95 feet and a crown spread of 132 feet. The Wye Oak was 96 and 119, so that's pretty comparable. The National Champion I mentioned above is 86 and 116, so it seems like it's not really a National Champion, and the Linden Oak could replace it.

Did some more investigating, this page shows the criteria for National Champion trees: http://www.dnr.state.md.us/forests/trees/bigtree.html

At the top of the page is a link to the 2005 Maryland National Champions, and the Linden Oak doesn't seem to be on it. There are two trees taller than the Linden Oak, but with a smaller crown. I don't know the circumference of the Linden Oak so we can't really compare. Richard

HI Richard,

Thanks so much for all your effort and trouble. I want the article to be accurate but it seems that there is no real consensus. Maybe the article should simply reflect this; that by some reckonings the Linden Oak is the lartgest White Oak. I also think it is important to mention Ida Mae Garrett. What are your thoughts?

Quarterczar 20:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)John[reply]

That sounds good to me.

I am thinking about measuring the circumference and nominating it for National Champion. If that works out, I will let you know what they say.

Thank you, Richard

There's an article in today's Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/27/AR2007122702624.html?sub=AR that is about another white oak in Maryland that is being declared Maryland's largest. Richard —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjones1 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the article and thought of you. I'd love to see their tree but I wonder if it actually beats this one. Did you ever nominate the Linden Oak? Quarterczar (talk) 22:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trunk circumference

What is the circumference of the trunk? --Ericjs (talk) 03:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Largest"

I can find no sources backing up that this is the "largest white oak tree in the United States". The article itself doesn't even really make the claim, except for in the first sentence. Discussion above seems to indicate plenty of evidence for larger trees, even in the same state!... Unless I or someone else finds some ironclad source for this claim, I will remove it very soon. Antepenultimate (talk) 05:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the claim, as no evidence has been forthcoming. Antepenultimate (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linden Oak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120723192746/http://www.americanforests.org/bigtree/quercus-alba-3/ to http://www.americanforests.org/bigtree/quercus-alba-3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]