Jump to content

Talk:M.O.T.O.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Photo

{{Image requested}}

Done! siafu 03:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Moto03.jpg

Image:Moto03.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Hot Stop talk-contribs 07:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Masters of the ObviousM.O.T.O. – This page was originally created under this name, and "Masters of the Obvious" is technically what M.O.T.O. stands for, but the band is primarily known by the abbreviation rather than the full name. M.O.T.O. is currently a redirect to this page, and what I propose to do is just switch the two...make this a redirect to THAT page, which would take on the contents and history of THIS one. It appears that an administrator is needed in order to do this. Mike (talk) 15:05, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support seems non-controversial. Not sure if a WP:RM is even necessary.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing is that I can't do it myself because in order for the article's history to be moved, the redirect has to be deleted. Mike (talk) 05:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M.O.T.O.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]