The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This user has faced vandalism and lived to tell the tale.
This user has a good sense of smell and can sniff out sock-puppets from a long distance, and is not afraid to lodge an immediate sock-puppet investigation against them.
These articles are well organised and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from WikiProject Eurovision or elsewhere, and have met the A-Class criteria. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
B-Class articles are detailed, clear and accessible, often with history or images; possible good article nominee. These article surpasses the B-Class criteria.
These articles are substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. They should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. These articles cite more than one reliable source and are better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but they fail one or more of the criteria for B-Class. They may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
These are articles that are developing, but which are quite incomplete. They might or might not cite adequate reliable sources. These articles have a usable amount of good content but are weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent. These articles should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as BLP. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category. These articles are either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. They are usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article all together.
Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
