Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautam Raj Khadka

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 10:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gautam Raj Khadka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NACTOR Zazzysa (talk) 06:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Malformed nomination fixed. Regards So Why 10:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: See above
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. So Why 10:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. So Why 10:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. So Why 10:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. So Why 10:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Visual Effects Artists are rarely notable unless they are Visual Effects Supervisors (akin to a DP). The subject has not received significant critical attention in independent, reliable sources. This article probably could have been speedily deleted under CSD criterion A7 he hadn't made the claim that he's is a well-known film technician. A claim, which other than by his own website is entirely unsupported.Mduvekot (talk) 16:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.