Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moussa Bureau

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moussa Bureau

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't cite any sources since 2009, and a web search for the title doesn't return anything apart from Wikipedia and forks. Furthermore, all the information from this article is already present at Bureau of the Pan-African Parliament#List of Bureaus with representatives by region. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 13:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from nom: As this article is over 10 years old, I suggest this be redirected rather than deleted. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment disagree, the article needs to be deleted --Devokewater @ 13:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Devokewater: Despite the indentation, I interpret this as a response to my comment. Redirects are cheap; saving incoming links is more important than deleting a title not mentioned in any sources. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.