Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Stand Chat
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 21:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- North Stand Chat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fan forum. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @923 · 21:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - Known as one of the most popular and used message boards for fans not only of Brighton & Hove Albion but other clubs. A quick search on the internet also backs this up: [1] RM-Taylor (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep is an incorrect request. Keep would be acceptable. But 18th most used board doesn't necessary make a strong claim of notability. Plus, not only are your claims of notability not in the article, there is no proof that the link you provided is a reliable source. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:WEB - Only coverage I can find just mentions the website in passing. --Cybercobra (talk) 00:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Cybercobra and WTWAG; there are a few reliable sources that mention it, but they are mentioned in passing. tedder (talk) 00:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable fan forum, no reason to keep. GiantSnowman 13:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but please move any noteworthy information into the supporters section of the article.Cptnono (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is just a fan forum. There are many top forums such as Neoseeker for example that don't have a Wikipedia page and don't need one. Spiderone (talk) 15:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.