Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The undertow/Notebook

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep: valid page. Sceptre ^(talk) 13:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:The undertow/Notebook

This is basicly a highly offensive attack page against me, consisting of taking all of my editing out of context as an attempt by the undertow to depict me as a racist, created because of a legitimite content dispute on white supremacy. Yahel Guhan 04:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep These are not taken out of context - they are differences. The also span many articles, and not just one. This is my creating a Request for Comment, asking you be topic banned based on your bias and edit patterns. I'm completely justified in using my page to highlight differences. There is no attack here. the_undertow ^talk 04:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - From WP:Userpage, the "not allowed" section:

"Material that can be construed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws. An exception is made for evidence compiled within a reasonable time frame to prepare for a dispute resolution process. This exception is subject to common sense, but as a general rule, two weeks is a reasonable time to prepare such a page."

I'm assuming this was in preparation for a dispute resolution process (RfCu probably qualifies), so there's nothing wrong with this. If someone needs to compile evidence prior to posting the RfC, why shouldn't they be allowed to do that in userspace? The content should be deleted, though, once the RfC is over. Equazcion •✗/C • 05:10, 10 Apr 2008 (UTC)

Keep. "No claims are being made on this page regarding whether or not these edits are appropriate." - I think that says enough. It's not an attack page. It's a Special:Contributions/Yahel Guhan mirror, possibly being used in prep for an RfC/U or something like that. We allow this. the_undertow is an admin, let's assume good faith on his part. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The diffs are, in fact, in preparation for an RFC/U, which the_undertow has already informed Yahel is being built. Lara❤Love 15:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above rationales, and per DHMO. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.