Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Requests for page protection | |
---|---|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death/murder/assassination/killing. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 19:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- @LilianaUwU: Can you present links to some of diffs that are BLP policy violations? I'm not seeing anything immediate while skimming through them, though I could very much be missing something. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would send one where a reference presumably is his address, but let's not give more work to OSers. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 20:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is one. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- The page history also has oversighted edits today. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined If another administrator sees this differently, I've no objection to a different decision. However, I've looked at every diff done to the article (minus the oversighted ones), and while there is some vandalism, it's not a lot. I count five vandalism edits to the article. I do see considerable contributions from IPs and new accounts that are productive. I'm reluctant to add protection to an article where there is quite a bit of productive activity on an article from such users, and where the vandalism rate is not particularly high. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Hammersoft. There has been 9
Tags: Reverted
out of 357 revisions. Peaceray (talk) 06:14, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Hammersoft. There has been 9
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits at all in almost six weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing against MOS by a self-admitted sock puppet. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:40, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:EC6C:6600:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism RainbowStar27 (talk) 02:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 82.35.134.133 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Peaceray (talk) 06:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- No vandalism by Arthurnfjdufhuehuew since final warning. Re-report if there is additional vandalism. Peaceray (talk) 06:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Misgendering and transphobia on the talk page of a trans man currently in the news. Funcrunch (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- I also request that the vandals' edits be redacted. Funcrunch (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 73.120.33.131 (talk · contribs) blocked by Red-tailed hawk. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)