Jump to content

Shrine Consolidation Policy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BD2412 (talk | contribs) at 19:52, 6 October 2022 (Clean up spacing errors around commas and other punctuation., replaced: ) , → ),, ( → ( (3), ), → ),, , → , (6)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Shrine Merger Policy (神社合, じんじゃごうし) is a historical policy of the Empire of Japan which sought to merge shrines. It is said that the number of shrines will be reduced by enshrining the deities of multiple shrines in one shrine (Inahachi Kinten Shrine [ja]), or by relocating them to the Setsumatsusha of one shrine and eliminating the other shrines. It mainly refers to those performed at the end of the Meiji era .

Shrine merger at the end of the Meiji period

Purpose of Shrine merger

The purpose of Shrine merger was to reduce the number of shrines and concentrate expenses on the remaining shrines so that they would be equipped with facilities and property above a certain standard, to maintain the dignity of the shrines, and to establish the continuous management of the shrines. In addition, the Meiji government's national principle that sect Shinto is recognized as a religion, but that shrines are not religions but "national religious ceremonies" (suzoku, seiji, sasai system)[1]）The policy was also to reduce the number of shrines until it was financially feasible for local governments to provide public funds to prefectural shrines and smaller shrines in accordance with the Ministry of the Interior.

This policy was led by the Ministry of Home Affairs Shrine Bureau, but apparently the Ministry's Regional Bureaus [ja] were also involved. The local bureaus were reluctant to allow local governments to contribute public funds to shrines below the prefectural level, which was one of the purposes of Shrine merger, because it would require local governments to bear an additional fiscal burden. It was incorporated into the policy.

The shrine-centered theory refers to the idea that local autonomy should be centered on shrines, and this led to the application of the "one town, one village, one shrine" standard to the policy of enshrinement. By aligning the shrine's Ujiko area with administrative divisions, the government sought to make the sole shrine of a town village the center of local activities.

Background of the ritual policy

The shrine ritual policy was promoted by the edict issued by the Minister of the Interior, Takashi Hara, in the 1st Saionji Cabinet in 1906 (Meiji 39), and initially it was given a considerable range according to the actual situation of the region. there were. However, 70,000 shrines, which were about 200,000 by 1914 (Taisho 3), were demolished nationwide because Tosuke Hirata, the Minister of Interior of the Second Katsura Cabinet, ordered that the instruction be strongly promoted. rice field. In particular, Mie Prefecture had a particularly strong policy of enshrining, and about 90% of all shrines in the prefecture were abolished. Wakayama and Ehime prefectures were followed by a ritual policy. However, since it was left to the governor's discretion to proceed with this policy, the degree of implementation will vary from region to region, and in Kyoto Prefecture it is about 10%.

This shrine ritual policy based on bureaucratic rationalism was not always carried out in the will of the worshipers of the parishioners. As a matter of course, the settlements and administrative divisions do not always match, and in some areas, the Ujigami was moved to a place far from the place of residence due to the goshi, and the Ujigami could not go to worship. Some shrines refused to worship, but in some places the worship was forcibly performed.

Opposition movement

On the part of the shrine parishioners and worshippers, they sometimes held meetings in opposition, but mainly they could not make any major movements, and could only show their dissatisfaction in the form of talking about how the deities of the shrines that had been abolished by the merged shrine had caused hauntings, etc.

That said, intellectuals such as Kumagusu Minakata, a naturalist and folklore scholar known for his research on slime molds, strongly opposed this policy . In the south, the shrine merger movement was

  1. weakening the godly thought,
  2. hindering the harmony of the people,
  3. debilitating the regions,
  4. depriving the people of comfort, diminishing humanity and harming customs,
  5. damaging patriotism, and
  6. damaging security of the land.
  7. historic sites and ancient traditions would be destroyed
  8. natural landscapes and natural monuments would be destroyed.

These opposition movements gradually came to a halt, and through the responses of the Imperial Diet, the sudden increase in enshrinement was temporarily halted after 1910 (1910-1943). However, it was already too late, and this policy of enshrinement had left a large impact, resulting in the disappearance of many rituals and customs, and damaging religious beliefs.[citation needed] However, it was too late, and the scars left by this ritual policy were large, and many ritual customs disappeared, resulting in damage to religious beliefs.[citation needed]

Reconstruction of the shrine that was enshrined

After the war, the prewar shrine non-religious system was dismantled and everything became a religious corporation . Many shrines were once enshrined and then revived. Even after the shrine was nominally enshrined, there were some places where facilities such as the shrine were left, and it was easy to rehabilitate in those places. Overall, it was easy to rehabilitate where the pre-government reverence base was maintained, but if the community that became the worship base disappeared or changed due to the consolidation of administrative divisions or changes in circumstances. It tended not to be revenge.

The sword of the shrine ritual and the division of the shrine Shinto

Along with the post-war revenge movement, antipathy to the former compulsory goshi policy surfaced within the industry. In Kyoto Prefecture, the Jinja Honkyo was spun off in response to the movement to join the Association of Shinto Shrines led by the Government of Japan, and in Hokkaido, the Hokkaido shrine association [ja] was established in a way that broke up with the Association of Shinto Shrines.

See also

References

  1. ^ 「日本的霊性」を問い直す 鎌田東二、千葉大学公共研究　第3巻第1号（2006 年6月）
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shrine_Consolidation_Policy&oldid=1114494177"