User talk:Ched/Archive 40: Difference between revisions
OneClickArchiver adding August thanks |
|||
Line 458: | Line 458: | ||
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from {{User|Lightbreather}}. You are being notified as you participated in the last unban discussion. You may give feedback [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Lightbreather_unban_appeal|here]]. For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 15:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from {{User|Lightbreather}}. You are being notified as you participated in the last unban discussion. You may give feedback [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Lightbreather_unban_appeal|here]]. For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 15:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
: Responded there - thank you for thinking of me. [[User:Ched|— Ched]] ([[User talk:Ched#top|talk]]) 16:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
: Responded there - thank you for thinking of me. [[User:Ched|— Ched]] ([[User talk:Ched#top|talk]]) 16:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
{{Clear}} |
|||
== August thanks == |
|||
{{User QAIbox |
|||
| title = [[User:Gerda Arendt/Places and songs 2022#29 Aug|August songs]]<!-- [[User:Gerda Arendt/Places and songs|for me]]--> |
|||
| image = Sunflowers above Rhine, Lorch.jpg |
|||
| image_upright = 0.8 |
|||
}} |
|||
Thank you for improving articles in August! -- [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 13:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: I haven't done much of anything lately - but thank you for the kind thoughts. [[User:Ched|— Ched]] ([[User talk:Ched#top|talk]]) 16:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:02, 5 October 2022
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ched. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 |
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamedsuppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
Not you
I'm so sorry, your emails came through, I'm just desperately trying to remember my password. I think I hid it from myself. I don't keep up my email and it's been about two months since I've checked them. I'll remember it. Just wanted you to know it isn't you. You can delete this if you want. --ARoseWolf 13:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- no problem @ARoseWolf: - nothing important, just a few tidbits that offer some insight into who I am. — Ched (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, tidbits and insight, even more reason to remember. It's all important. I'll look at it and respond. I just wanted to let you know that I saw it. --ARoseWolf 14:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, by the way - I did go back and check to see if your real-life name was mentioned there .. and it is a very beautiful name by the way. — Ched (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I wasn't born with that name but it was my quasi-legal name growing up (long story I'll tell you by email in my response). I've had opportunities to change it but I associate more life experiences with it than any name I may have had before I was adopted by my uncle and aunt. Plus, I've heard just about every possible pronunciation imaginable. It makes for a good conversation starter. --ARoseWolf 14:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, by the way - I did go back and check to see if your real-life name was mentioned there .. and it is a very beautiful name by the way. — Ched (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Oh joy ...
another Did not, did too venue on Wikipedia. You know - cause we don't have enough places here. — Ched (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- There seems to be the notion that the more you talk about it the more you will learn. When in fact it's just more of the same usually with out enough extensive context to come to a fair position or decision. Until we design a system that explores context in all of its many incarnations we cannot, not will not, but cannot consistently deal fairly with people. I was lucky enough to experience an arbitration many years ago in which the arbs took weeks to investigate allegations. I didn't realize how fortunate I was until recently. Most arbs do not have that kind of time. As we deal more and more with editors with long histories the more we need to be able to understand those histories and to place our concerns in context of that information. Another venue to deal with admins! One becomes so weary. Littleolive oil (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Well I'm sure it's all with the best intentions - but as you say Olive - one does indeed become weary. Still - thinking positive, so I hope you have a wonderful 2022. — Ched (talk) 03:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- I always tend to believe people mean well.:O) Littleolive oil (talk) 20:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
December thanks
Thank you for improving article quality in December. If you like Advent music, check this out. If you like Christmas music and wishes, watch my user talk until 27 December ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- And thank you Gerda for everything you do here. Not really doing much this month, but maybe next month I can ramp it up a bit. I hope you and your family have a wonderful and Merry Christmas - and a great New Year in 2022. — Ched (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- look at the "songs" - now the last, Herrscher des Himmels, erhöre das Lallen, BWV 248 III, shown on the Main page, and here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
See: Chinese covid coverup 8 support v 9 oppose. The closing rational makes it obvious that this was nothing more than a supervote[1]. Pitiful; even more so coming from an experienced editor. — Ched (talk) 04:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not too surprising, though. I wish it were, but...Intothatdarkness 17:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hey @Intothatdarkness:, always good to see you out and about. Yea, I agree; it should be surprising, but it isn't. So sad the amount of "political" editing that goes on here .. but I know it's nothing new. — Ched (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
October thanks
Thank you for improving articles in October! - Today: see yourself, read about a hymn praying to not be on earth in vain, about a comics artist whose characters have character (another collaboration of the "perennial gang", broken by one of us banned - as if blocked wasn't enough), and in memory of the last prima donna assoluta, Edita Gruberová. I had to go to two grave sites last week, one who died now, one who died 10 years ago, so standing upright and in black seems appropriate. More colours - but subdued - can be had on hikes, - click on songs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda, but I'm sorry to say that I haven't really felt up to editing much lately. Hopefully that will change soon. — Ched (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- no pressure, - just sad sad that we ban people who have time and are willing, - so strange --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- today: memories in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Significant day in many respects, - remember 2010? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry - you'd have to be more specific on 2010. If by "significant" you mean something on wiki - no, not really. I don't carry that stuff around with me anymore, it got to be too heavy on my heart. — Ched (talk) 00:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Grace Sherwood who was pardoned 300 years later, but the author wasn't. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ahh - I remember those days: sad and angry times. Haven't talked to him in a while - will have to drop a "Holiday greetings" to him. — Ched (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Good idea! - That was the first time I witnessed how an editor is treated in a way he or she only wants to leave. It happened now to Doug, and LouisAlain, and every time it happens I wonder if Wikipedia can afford loosing content editors. I was in Paris, and passed cafés, and wondered if some LouisAlain added information as an ip because as a named user, he is no longer welcome on the site "anybody" can edit, allegedly. He gave us soooo much. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- ... or Dark Clouds of Joy --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ahh - I remember those days: sad and angry times. Haven't talked to him in a while - will have to drop a "Holiday greetings" to him. — Ched (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Grace Sherwood who was pardoned 300 years later, but the author wasn't. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry - you'd have to be more specific on 2010. If by "significant" you mean something on wiki - no, not really. I don't carry that stuff around with me anymore, it got to be too heavy on my heart. — Ched (talk) 00:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
- An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.
- Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the
deletelogentry
anddeletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928) - When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
- A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
- A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.
April
April: Easter - resilience - Spring - thank you for being around --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
dance and singing, peace doves and icecream --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Dove sono (Where are those happy moments ...?) - concert with Kyiv orchestra and Aleksey Semenenko (quite a story!) tonight, Symphony with war and peace in the subtitle --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
- Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
- Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.
- The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
- A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.
- Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.
May music
I like my talk today (actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
June songs
My song collection in June is especially rich, look, and the hall where I first heard DFD, Pierre Boulez and Murray Perahia. Do you find the baby deer in the meadow (last row)? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Today is a birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Happy Birthday Gerda. — Ched (talk) 22:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- did I say mine? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
July thanks
Thank you for improving articles in July. Did you know that we had 3 FAs by QAI members this month? - I was away, for hiking in the Swiss Alps and a funeral, more on my talk. Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the Arbitration Committee, a checkuser or an oversighter for action (as applicable, per ArbCom's recent updated guidance) instead of the administrator making the block.
- Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
- Community comment on the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines is requested until 8 October.
- The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.
- Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
- A modification to the deletion RfC remedy in the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.
- The second phase of the 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review closes 3 October.
- An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their passwords are secure, and reminded that ArbCom reserves the right to not restore adminship in cases of poor account security. You can also use two-factor authentication (2FA) to provide an extra level of security.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections open 2 October and close 8 October.
- You are invited to comment on candidates in the 2022 CUOS appointments process.
- An RfC is open to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.
- Tech tip: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at Special:Undelete.
Repetitive contributions by a now blocked user
Hey there! I noticed you were a contributor to the Fearless Fagan article (where I again noticed this) so I'm taking a liberty of checking in with you. I edit a lot of old movie articles and every once in a while I see a film article infobox with budget numbers which are sourced to an unlinked "The Eddie Mannix Ledger." It seems User:Dutchy85 was in the habit of adding this sort of detail, always citing in an identical way. In answer to a query about this (in their talk archive 9) Dutchy85 claimed they had gotten access through the Margaret Herrick Library in Los Angeles. This would be cool if true, but it's a primary source. The library does list a photocopy of that document in their archives, on microfiche. Given that this user has been blocked indefinitely for several instances of copyright violation, how can I trust this claim of sourcing? Apparently there are several reliable sources which seem to draw from this source and count on it as reliable. Could we use such data if it were republished in analysis like this study, beginning on page 97? BusterD (talk) 08:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hey BusterD - sorry for the slow response. I'm on ... let's call it "medical leave" at the moment, but if I get a burst of energy then I'll take a look. To be honest though - you probably want to check with someone else on this for now. — Ched (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Lightbreather appeal
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from Lightbreather (talk · contribs). You are being notified as you participated in the last unban discussion. You may give feedback here. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Responded there - thank you for thinking of me. — Ched (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
August thanks
Thank you for improving articles in August! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- I haven't done much of anything lately - but thank you for the kind thoughts. — Ched (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)