Bulgar language: Difference between revisions
BULGARIAN LANGUAGE IS SOUTSLAVIC BRANCH LANGUAGE FROM THE SLAVIC THREE FAMILY. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Distinguish|text=the [[Bulgarian language]]}} |
{{Distinguish|text=the [[Bulgarian language]]}} |
||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2022}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2022}}d |
||
{{Infobox language |
|||
| name = Bulgar |
|||
| region = From [[Central Asia]] to the [[Pontic–Caspian steppe]], the [[Volga]] and the [[Danube]] and [[Southern Italy]] ([[Molise]], [[Campania]]) |
|||
| ethnicity = [[Bulgars]] |
|||
| extinct = {{Citation needed span|By the 9th or 10th centuries on the Danube and by the 14th century in the Volga region|date=November 2023}} |
|||
| familycolor = Altaic |
|||
| fam1 = [[Turkic languages|Turkic]] |
|||
| fam2 = [[Oghuric languages|Oghuric]] |
|||
| iso3 = xbo |
|||
| glotto = bolg1250 |
|||
| glottorefname = Bolgarian |
|||
| linglist = xbo |
|||
}} |
|||
'''BULGARIAN LANGUAGE IS SLAVIC LANGUAGE FROM SOUTSLAVIC BRANCH!''' |
|||
'''Bulgar''' (also known as '''Bulghar''', '''Bolgar''', or '''Bolghar''') is an extinct [[Oghuric languages|Oghuric]] [[Turkic language]] spoken by the [[Bulgars]]. |
|||
Bulgarian language is decent 8 century a.d wrote for the 1 time from the BROTHERS SAINTS BULGARIANS SAINT CYRIL AND SAINT METODIÏ AND THEY'RE STUDENTS SAINT KLIMENT OHRIDSKI AND SAINT NAUM in the 1 BULGARIAN EMPIRE ruled the from KNYZ BORIS 1. From the BULGARIAN LANGUAGE evolved serbian language croatian language bosnian language slovenian language and montenegrian language from the soutslavic branch also where and is THE BULGARIAN LANGUAGE. From the west slavic languages like polish language chezch language slovakian language and sorbian language. From the east slavic languages russian language ukrainian language belorussian language. They parent of all is THE BULGARIAN LANGUAGE. |
|||
The name is derived from the Bulgars, a tribal association that established the Bulgar state known as [[Old Great Bulgaria]] in the mid-7th century, giving rise to the [[First Bulgarian Empire|Danubian Bulgaria]] by the 680s.<ref name="brit">Encyclopædia Britannica Online – [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-80003/Turkic-languages ''Bolgar Turkic''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080623115154/http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-80003/Turkic-languages |date=2008-06-23 }}</ref><ref name = "campbell">Campbell, George L. ''Compendium of the World's Languages''. [[Routledge]], 2000. [https://books.google.com/books?id=jeX-i2Ve0CgC&pg=RA2-PA274&dq=bulgar+language+turkic+danube&sig=djDXx0auQm9scuJKrQAOcJkWL0s ''page 274'']</ref><ref name=marc>Marcantonio, Angela. ''The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics''. Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2002. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Cp-tB08yd2EC&pg=PA25&dq=%22three+parts%22+bulgar+language+turkic&sig=EsfSon0NiB5cHYPxjoHzkIrpL80 ''page 25'']</ref> While the language was extinct in Danubian Bulgaria (in favour of [[Old Bulgarian]]), it persisted in [[Volga Bulgaria]], eventually being replaced by the modern [[Chuvash language]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cp-tB08yd2EC&pg=PA167 |title=The Uralic language family: facts, myths and statistics |first=Angela |last=Marcantonio |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |year=2002 |isbn=0-631-23170-6 |page=167}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=29BAeKHwvuoC&pg=PA88 |title=Encyclopedia of the languages of Europe |first=Glanville |last=Price |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |year=2000 |isbn=0-631-22039-9 |page=88}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uJ-7yFXRpiYC&pg=PA38 |title=Studies in Turkic and Mongolic linguistics |first=Gerard |last=Clauson |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2002 |isbn=0-415-29772-9 |page=38}}</ref> Other than Chuvash, Bulgar is the only language to be definitively classified as an Oghur Turkic language. |
|||
The inclusion of other languages such as [[Hunnish language|Hunnish]], [[Khazar language|Khazar]] and [[Sabir people|Sabir]] within Oghur Turkic remains speculative owing to the paucity of historical records. Some scholars suggest [[Hunnic language|Hunnish]] had strong ties with Bulgar and to modern Chuvash<ref>{{cite journal |last=Pritsak |first=Omeljan |author-link=Omeljan Pritsak |date=1982 |title=The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41036005 |journal=Harvard Ukrainian Studies |publisher=[[Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute]] |volume=IV |issue=4 |pages=470 |issn=0363-5570 |jstor=41036005 |quote="The language had strong ties to Bulgar language and to modern Chuvash, but also had some important connections, especially lexical and morphological, to Ottoman Turkish and Yakut" |place=Cambridge, Massachusetts}}</ref> and refer to this extended grouping as separate Hunno-Bulgar languages.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Archived |first=Article |title="The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (pages 428, ..., 476), author: Omeljan Pritsak |url=https://www.academia.edu/88411462 |journal= |pages=430 |quote="I was able to establish a Danube- Bulgarian nominative- suffix /A/ from the consonant stems. Recalling that Danube- Bulgarian was a Hunnic language."}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ramer |first=Alexis Manaster |title=Proto-Bulgarian/Danube Bulgar/Hunno-Bulgar Bekven |url=https://www.academia.edu/41975042 |journal= |page=1 p |quote="Granberg's suggestion that we should revive the term Hunno-Bulgar may well became that replacement — once it is clear that Hunnic and Bulgar were closely related and perhaps even the same language."}}</ref> However, such speculations are not based on proper linguistic evidence, since the language of the Huns is almost unknown except for a few attested words, which are Indo-European borrowings, and personal names. Scholars generally consider Hunnish as unclassifiable.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Savelyev |first=Alexander |title=Chuvash and the Bulgharic Languages |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/41762/chapter-abstract/354239965?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false |access-date=2024-03-30 |website=academic.oup.com |pages=448 |isbn=978-0-19-880462-8}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Golden |first=Peter B. |title=An introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples: ethnogenesis and state-formation in medieval and early modern Eurasia and the Middle East |date=1992 |publisher=O. Harrassowitz |isbn=978-3-447-03274-2 |series=Turcologica |location=Wiesbaden |pages=88 89}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=RÓNA-TAS |first=ANDRÁS |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7829/j.ctv280b77f |title=Hungarians and Europe in the Early Middle Ages |date=1999-03-01 |publisher=Central European University Press |isbn=978-963-386-572-9 |pages=208}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Sinor |first=Denis |title=Studies in medieval inner Asia |date=1997 |publisher=Ashgate |isbn=978-0-86078-632-0 |series=Collected studies series |location=Aldershot, Hampshire |pages=336}}</ref> |
|||
==Affiliation== |
==Affiliation== |
||
Mainstream scholarship places Bulgar among the "Lir" branch of [[Turkic languages]] referred to as [[Oghuric languages|Oghur Turkic]], Lir-Turkic or, indeed, "Bulgar Turkic", as opposed to the "Shaz"-type of Common Turkic. The "Lir" branch is characterized by sound correspondences such as Oghuric /r/ versus Common Turkic (or Shaz-Turkic) /z/ and Oghuric /l/ versus Common Turkic (Shaz-Turkic) /š/.<ref name="brit"/><ref name=marc/><ref name=johanson>Johanson, Lars. 1998. "The history of Turkic." In: Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 1998. ''The Turkic languages''. London: Routledge, pp. 81–125.{{cite web |url=http://www.turkiclanguages.com/www/classification.html |title=Turcologica |access-date=2007-09-05 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110408063746/http://www.turkiclanguages.com/www/classification.html |archive-date=2011-04-08 }}; Johanson, Lars. 2007. Chuvash. ''Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics''. Oxford: Elsevier.</ref> As was stated by [[Estakhri|Al-Istakhri]] (Х c. AD), "''The language of the [[Khazar language|Khazars]] is different than the language of the Turks and the Persians, nor does a tongue of (any) group of humanity have anything in common with it and the language of the Bulgars is like the language of the Khazars, but the Burtas have another language.''"<ref>{{Cite book |last=Заходер |first=Б. Н. |title=Каспийский свод сведений о Восточной Европе : Горган и Поволжье в IX-X вв |publisher=Восточная литература |year=1962 |editor-last=Беляев |editor-first=Е.А. |volume=I |location=Москва |pages=238 |language=ru}}</ref> |
Mainstream scholarship places Bulgar among the "Lir" branch of [[Turkic languages]] referred to as [[Oghuric languages|Oghur Turkic]], Lir-Turkic or, indeed, "Bulgar Turkic", as opposed to the "Shaz"-type of Common Turkic. The "Lir" branch is characterized by sound correspondences such as Oghuric /r/ versus Common Turkic (or Shaz-Turkic) /z/ and Oghuric /l/ versus Common Turkic (Shaz-Turkic) /š/.<ref name="brit">Encyclopædia Britannica Online – [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-80003/Turkic-languages ''Bolgar Turkic''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080623115154/http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-80003/Turkic-languages|date=2008-06-23}}</ref><ref name="marc">Marcantonio, Angela. ''The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics''. Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2002. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Cp-tB08yd2EC&pg=PA25&dq=%22three+parts%22+bulgar+language+turkic&sig=EsfSon0NiB5cHYPxjoHzkIrpL80 ''page 25'']</ref><ref name=johanson>Johanson, Lars. 1998. "The history of Turkic." In: Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 1998. ''The Turkic languages''. London: Routledge, pp. 81–125.{{cite web |url=http://www.turkiclanguages.com/www/classification.html |title=Turcologica |access-date=2007-09-05 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110408063746/http://www.turkiclanguages.com/www/classification.html |archive-date=2011-04-08 }}; Johanson, Lars. 2007. Chuvash. ''Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics''. Oxford: Elsevier.</ref> As was stated by [[Estakhri|Al-Istakhri]] (Х c. AD), "''The language of the [[Khazar language|Khazars]] is different than the language of the Turks and the Persians, nor does a tongue of (any) group of humanity have anything in common with it and the language of the Bulgars is like the language of the Khazars, but the Burtas have another language.''"<ref>{{Cite book |last=Заходер |first=Б. Н. |title=Каспийский свод сведений о Восточной Европе : Горган и Поволжье в IX-X вв |publisher=Восточная литература |year=1962 |editor-last=Беляев |editor-first=Е.А. |volume=I |location=Москва |pages=238 |language=ru}}</ref> |
||
The only surviving language from this linguistic group is [[Chuvash language|Chuvash]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2017-01-02 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161213172602/http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf |archive-date=2016-12-13 }}</ref> He concludes that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the ''Hunnic languages'', as he calls the [[Oghuric languages|Oghur languages]].<ref>The Turks: Early ages, Vol. 1 , Cem Oğuz, {{ISBN|9756782552}}, Author Murat Ocak, Redactors: Hasan Celāl Güzel, Cem Oğuz, Osman Karatay, Publisher: Yeni Türkiye, 2002, p. 535.</ref> According to the Bulgarian Antoaneta Granberg, the Hunno-Bulgar linguistic situation is further complicated by the extensive migration of nomadic communities of [[Hunnic language|Hunnic]] and [[Oghuric languages|Oghuric]] peoples from East to West. This migration brought them into contact with a variety of different lands, neighbors, cultures, and languages, including [[China]] and [[Rome]]. Linguistic individuation of the Hunno-Bulgaric language family has yet to be conclusively established. A Hunno-Bulgar language is believed to have formed on the North-Western borders of China in the 3rd-5th c. BC.<ref>The Hunno-Bulgar language, Antoaneta Granberg, {{cite web |title=Archived copy |url=http://www.centralasien.dk/joomla/images/journal/DSCA2008.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151120184254/http://www.centralasien.dk/joomla/images/journal/DSCA2008.pdf |archive-date=2015-11-20 |access-date=2015-11-20}}</ref> |
The only surviving language from this linguistic group is [[Chuvash language|Chuvash]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2017-01-02 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161213172602/http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf |archive-date=2016-12-13 }}</ref> He concludes that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the ''Hunnic languages'', as he calls the [[Oghuric languages|Oghur languages]].<ref>The Turks: Early ages, Vol. 1 , Cem Oğuz, {{ISBN|9756782552}}, Author Murat Ocak, Redactors: Hasan Celāl Güzel, Cem Oğuz, Osman Karatay, Publisher: Yeni Türkiye, 2002, p. 535.</ref> According to the Bulgarian Antoaneta Granberg, the Hunno-Bulgar linguistic situation is further complicated by the extensive migration of nomadic communities of [[Hunnic language|Hunnic]] and [[Oghuric languages|Oghuric]] peoples from East to West. This migration brought them into contact with a variety of different lands, neighbors, cultures, and languages, including [[China]] and [[Rome]]. Linguistic individuation of the Hunno-Bulgaric language family has yet to be conclusively established. A Hunno-Bulgar language is believed to have formed on the North-Western borders of China in the 3rd-5th c. BC.<ref>The Hunno-Bulgar language, Antoaneta Granberg, {{cite web |title=Archived copy |url=http://www.centralasien.dk/joomla/images/journal/DSCA2008.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151120184254/http://www.centralasien.dk/joomla/images/journal/DSCA2008.pdf |archive-date=2015-11-20 |access-date=2015-11-20}}</ref> |
||
Line 116: | Line 101: | ||
==Volga Bulgar== |
==Volga Bulgar== |
||
The language spoken by the population of Volga Bulgaria is known as ''Volga-Bulgar''. There are a number of surviving inscriptions in Volga-Bulgar, some of which are written with [[Arabic script|Arabic letters]], alongside the continuing use of [[Orkhon script]]. These are all largely decipherable. That language persisted until the 13th or the 14th century. In that region, it may have ultimately given rise to the [[Chuvash language]], which is most closely related to it<ref name="clark">Clark, Larry. 1998. "Chuvash." In: Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 1998. ''The Turkic languages''. London: Routledge, p.434</ref> and which is classified as the only surviving member of a separate "[[Oghuric languages|Oghur-Turkic]]" (or Lir-Turkic) branch of the Turkic languages, to which Bulgar is also considered to have belonged (see above).<ref name="brit" /><ref name="campbell" /><ref name="chuvash">{{cite web |title=Формирование болгарской (древнечувашской) народности |url=http://gov.cap.ru/hierarhy_cap.asp?page=./86/3743/1046/1053 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930023541/https://gov.cap.ru/hierarhy_cap.asp?page=./86/3743/1046/1053 |archive-date=September 30, 2007}}</ref> Still, the precise position of Chuvash within the [[Oghuric languages|Oghur]] family of languages is a matter of dispute among linguists. Since the comparative material attributable to the extinct members of [[Oghuric languages|Oghuric]] ([[Khazar language|Khazar]] and Bulgar) is scant, little is known about any precise interrelation of these languages and it is a matter of dispute whether Chuvash, the only "Lir"-type language with sufficient extant linguistic material, might be the daughter language of any of these or just a sister branch.<ref name="johanson" /> |
The language spoken by the population of Volga Bulgaria is known as ''Volga-Bulgar''. There are a number of surviving inscriptions in Volga-Bulgar, some of which are written with [[Arabic script|Arabic letters]], alongside the continuing use of [[Orkhon script]]. These are all largely decipherable. That language persisted until the 13th or the 14th century. In that region, it may have ultimately given rise to the [[Chuvash language]], which is most closely related to it<ref name="clark">Clark, Larry. 1998. "Chuvash." In: Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 1998. ''The Turkic languages''. London: Routledge, p.434</ref> and which is classified as the only surviving member of a separate "[[Oghuric languages|Oghur-Turkic]]" (or Lir-Turkic) branch of the Turkic languages, to which Bulgar is also considered to have belonged (see above).<ref name="brit" /><ref name="campbell">Campbell, George L. ''Compendium of the World's Languages''. [[Routledge]], 2000. [https://books.google.com/books?id=jeX-i2Ve0CgC&pg=RA2-PA274&dq=bulgar+language+turkic+danube&sig=djDXx0auQm9scuJKrQAOcJkWL0s ''page 274'']</ref><ref name="chuvash">{{cite web |title=Формирование болгарской (древнечувашской) народности |url=http://gov.cap.ru/hierarhy_cap.asp?page=./86/3743/1046/1053 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930023541/https://gov.cap.ru/hierarhy_cap.asp?page=./86/3743/1046/1053 |archive-date=September 30, 2007}}</ref> Still, the precise position of Chuvash within the [[Oghuric languages|Oghur]] family of languages is a matter of dispute among linguists. Since the comparative material attributable to the extinct members of [[Oghuric languages|Oghuric]] ([[Khazar language|Khazar]] and Bulgar) is scant, little is known about any precise interrelation of these languages and it is a matter of dispute whether Chuvash, the only "Lir"-type language with sufficient extant linguistic material, might be the daughter language of any of these or just a sister branch.<ref name="johanson" /> |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+Numbers and Vocabulary in Volga Bulgar<ref name=":3">HAKIMZJANOV, F. S. "NEW VOLGA BULGARIAN INSCRIPTIONS." Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 40, no. 1, Akadémiai Kiadó, 1986, pp. 173–77, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/23657681].</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite book|last=Tekin|first=Talât|url=http://kutuphane.akmb.gov.tr/opac/details?id=46293&materialType=BK&query=Volga+Bulgar+Kitabeleri+ve+Volga+Bulgarcas%C4%B1|title=Volga Bulgar kitabeleri ve Volga Bulgarcası|publisher=Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi|year=1988|isbn=978-9-751600-660|place=Ankara|pages=30–38}}</ref><ref name=":2">A Volga Bulgarıan Inscription From 1307 A. Róna-tas</ref><ref name=":0">Unpublished Volga Bulgarian inscriptions A. H. Khalikov and J. G. Muhametshin</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Закиев М. З. Лингвоэтнические особенности волжских булгар — главного этнического корня татар|url=http://bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1|access-date=2021-08-24|website=bulgarizdat.ru}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Category:Bulgar numerals – Wiktionary|url=https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Bulgar_numerals|access-date=2021-08-24|website=en.wiktionary.org|date=31 July 2021|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Proto-Turkic/History of Proto-Turkic language – Wikibooks, open books for an open world|url=https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Proto-Turkic/History_of_Proto-Turkic_language|access-date=2021-08-24|website=en.wikibooks.org|language=en}}</ref> |
|+Numbers and Vocabulary in Volga Bulgar<ref name=":3">HAKIMZJANOV, F. S. "NEW VOLGA BULGARIAN INSCRIPTIONS." Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 40, no. 1, Akadémiai Kiadó, 1986, pp. 173–77, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/23657681].</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite book|last=Tekin|first=Talât|url=http://kutuphane.akmb.gov.tr/opac/details?id=46293&materialType=BK&query=Volga+Bulgar+Kitabeleri+ve+Volga+Bulgarcas%C4%B1|title=Volga Bulgar kitabeleri ve Volga Bulgarcası|publisher=Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi|year=1988|isbn=978-9-751600-660|place=Ankara|pages=30–38}}</ref><ref name=":2">A Volga Bulgarıan Inscription From 1307 A. Róna-tas</ref><ref name=":0">Unpublished Volga Bulgarian inscriptions A. H. Khalikov and J. G. Muhametshin</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Закиев М. З. Лингвоэтнические особенности волжских булгар — главного этнического корня татар|url=http://bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1|access-date=2021-08-24|website=bulgarizdat.ru}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Category:Bulgar numerals – Wiktionary|url=https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Bulgar_numerals|access-date=2021-08-24|website=en.wiktionary.org|date=31 July 2021|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Proto-Turkic/History of Proto-Turkic language – Wikibooks, open books for an open world|url=https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Proto-Turkic/History_of_Proto-Turkic_language|access-date=2021-08-24|website=en.wikibooks.org|language=en}}</ref> |
Revision as of 16:46, 19 July 2024
d
BULGARIAN LANGUAGE IS SLAVIC LANGUAGE FROM SOUTSLAVIC BRANCH!
Bulgarian language is decent 8 century a.d wrote for the 1 time from the BROTHERS SAINTS BULGARIANS SAINT CYRIL AND SAINT METODIÏ AND THEY'RE STUDENTS SAINT KLIMENT OHRIDSKI AND SAINT NAUM in the 1 BULGARIAN EMPIRE ruled the from KNYZ BORIS 1. From the BULGARIAN LANGUAGE evolved serbian language croatian language bosnian language slovenian language and montenegrian language from the soutslavic branch also where and is THE BULGARIAN LANGUAGE. From the west slavic languages like polish language chezch language slovakian language and sorbian language. From the east slavic languages russian language ukrainian language belorussian language. They parent of all is THE BULGARIAN LANGUAGE.
Affiliation
Mainstream scholarship places Bulgar among the "Lir" branch of Turkic languages referred to as Oghur Turkic, Lir-Turkic or, indeed, "Bulgar Turkic", as opposed to the "Shaz"-type of Common Turkic. The "Lir" branch is characterized by sound correspondences such as Oghuric /r/ versus Common Turkic (or Shaz-Turkic) /z/ and Oghuric /l/ versus Common Turkic (Shaz-Turkic) /š/.[1][2][3] As was stated by Al-Istakhri (Х c. AD), "The language of the Khazars is different than the language of the Turks and the Persians, nor does a tongue of (any) group of humanity have anything in common with it and the language of the Bulgars is like the language of the Khazars, but the Burtas have another language."[4]
The only surviving language from this linguistic group is Chuvash.[5] He concludes that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[6] According to the Bulgarian Antoaneta Granberg, the Hunno-Bulgar linguistic situation is further complicated by the extensive migration of nomadic communities of Hunnic and Oghuric peoples from East to West. This migration brought them into contact with a variety of different lands, neighbors, cultures, and languages, including China and Rome. Linguistic individuation of the Hunno-Bulgaric language family has yet to be conclusively established. A Hunno-Bulgar language is believed to have formed on the North-Western borders of China in the 3rd-5th c. BC.[7]
Bulgarian views
On the other hand, some Bulgarian historians, especially in recent decades, link the Bulgar language to the Iranic language group instead (more specifically, the Pamir languages are frequently mentioned), noting the presence of Iranian words in the modern Bulgarian language.[8][9][10][11][page needed] According to Raymond Detrez, who is a specialist in Bulgarian history and language,[12] such views are based on anti-Turkish sentiments and the presence of Iranian words in the modern Bulgarian is result of Ottoman Turkish linguistic influence.[13] Indeed, other Bulgarian historians, especially older ones, only point out certain signs of Iranian influence in the Turkic base[14] or indeed support the Turkic theory.[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]
Danubian Bulgar
The language of the Danube Bulgars (or Danubian Bulgar) is recorded in a small number of inscriptions, which are found in Pliska, the first capital of First Bulgarian Empire, and in the rock churches near the town of Murfatlar, in present-day Romania. Some of these inscriptions are written in the Greek characters, others in the Kuban alphabet which is a variant of Orkhon script. Most of these appear to have been of a private character (oaths, dedications, inscriptions on grave stones) and some were court inventories. Although attempts at decipherment have been made, none of them has gained wide acceptance. These inscriptions in Danubian Bulgar are found along with other, official ones written in Greek; which was used as the official state language of the First Bulgarian Empire until the end of the ninth century, when it was replaced by Old Bulgarian (also called Old Church Slavonic, later Slavonic).[23]
The language of the Danubian Bulgars is also known from a small number of loanwords in the Old Bulgarian language, as well as terms occurring in Bulgar Greek-language inscriptions, contemporary Byzantine texts,[24] and later Slavonic Old Bulgarian texts. Most of these words designate titles and other concepts concerning the affairs of state, including the official 12-year cyclic calendar (as used in the Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans). The language became extinct in Danubian Bulgaria in the ninth century as the Bulgar nobility became gradually Slavicized after the Old Bulgarian tongue was declared as official in 893.
Old Church Slavonic | Chuvash | Hungarian | Common Turkic | |
---|---|---|---|---|
token, trace | БЕЛЕГ (beleg), БИЛЕГ (bileg) | палӑк (palăk) | bélyeg | *belgü |
bracelet | БЕЛЬЧҮГ (bel'čug) | – | – | *bileçüg |
pillow | ДОХЬТОРЬ (dox'tor') | ҫытар (śïtar) | – | *yogtu |
image, icon | КАПЬ (kap') | кап (kap) | kép | *kēp |
honour | САНЬ (san'), САМЬ (sam') | сум (sum) | szám | *sān |
Phonology
Unlike Volga Bulgarian and Chuvash, d'ization is seen in the /j/ sounds at the beginning of words. Talât Tekin argues that this sound corresponds to the initial gy sound in Hungarian and is pronounced close to it.[25]
Danube Bulgar / Old Church Slavonic |
Volga Bulgar | Chuvash | Common Turkic | |
---|---|---|---|---|
snake | ДИЛОМЬ (dilom') | – | ҫӗлен (śílen) | *yï̄lan |
pillow | ДОХЬТОРЬ (dox'tor') | – | ҫытар (śytar) | *yogdu (Mongolian зогдор) |
horse | ΔΥΑΝ (dwan) | – | – | *yunt |
An ethnicity | ΔΟΥΑΡΗⲤ (dovaris) | يوارى (yuwāri) | – | – |
seven | ЧИТ (čit) | جىَاتِ (čyeti) | ҫиччӗ (śiččĕ) | *yẹti |
Volga Bulgar
The language spoken by the population of Volga Bulgaria is known as Volga-Bulgar. There are a number of surviving inscriptions in Volga-Bulgar, some of which are written with Arabic letters, alongside the continuing use of Orkhon script. These are all largely decipherable. That language persisted until the 13th or the 14th century. In that region, it may have ultimately given rise to the Chuvash language, which is most closely related to it[26] and which is classified as the only surviving member of a separate "Oghur-Turkic" (or Lir-Turkic) branch of the Turkic languages, to which Bulgar is also considered to have belonged (see above).[1][27][28] Still, the precise position of Chuvash within the Oghur family of languages is a matter of dispute among linguists. Since the comparative material attributable to the extinct members of Oghuric (Khazar and Bulgar) is scant, little is known about any precise interrelation of these languages and it is a matter of dispute whether Chuvash, the only "Lir"-type language with sufficient extant linguistic material, might be the daughter language of any of these or just a sister branch.[3]
Volga Bulgar – البلغَاڔِى | Chuvash – Чӑвашла[36] | Proto-Turkic | Volga Bulgar – البلغَاڔِى | Chuvash – Чӑвашла | Proto-Turkic | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
one | بیر (bīr) | пӗр (pĕr) | *bīr | monument | بَلُو (belüv) | палӑк (palăk) | *belig |
two | اَكِ (eki) | иккӗ (ikkĕ) | *ẹki | water | شِو (šïv) | шыв (šyv) | *sub |
three | وج (več) | виççӗ (viśśĕ) | *üč | son | اَول (avïl) | ывӑл (yvăl) | *ogul |
four | تُوات (tüvet) | тăваттă (tăvattă) | *tȫrt | daughter | هِير (hīr) | хӗр (hĕr) | *kï̄ŕ |
five | بيال (biyel) | пиллӗк (pillĕk) | *bẹ̄ĺ(k) | day | كُوَان (küven or kön) | кун (kun) | *kün |
six | اَلطِ (altï) | улттӑ (ulttă) | *altï | week | ايرنى (ērne) | эрне (erne) | (from Persian آدینه (âdine)) |
seven | جیَاتِ (čyeti) | ҫиччӗ (śiččĕ) | *yẹti | month | اَيخ (ayïx) | уйӑх (ujăh) | *āń(k) |
eight | سَكِر (sekir) | саккӑр (sakkăr) | *sekiŕ | year | جال (čal) | ҫул (śul) | *yāĺ |
nine | طُخِر (tuxïr) | тӑххӑр (tăhhăr) | *tokuŕ | history | تَارِيخ (tārix) | истори (istori) | (from Arabic تَارِيخ (tārīḵ)) |
ten | وان (van) | вуннӑ (vunnă) | *ōn | to become | بَل (bal) | пул (pul) | *bōl- |
twenty | جِيِرم (čiyirim) | ҫирӗм (śirĕm) | *yẹgirmi | to do, make | طَن (ta-n) | ту (tu) | - |
thirty | وطر (vutur) | вӑтӑр (vătăr) | *otuŕ | to go | بَر (bar) | пыр (pyr) | *bar- |
forty | حرح (xïrïx) | хӗрӗх (hĕrĕh) | *kïrk | to love | سَو (sev) | сав (sav) | *seb- |
fifty | الو (ellüv), اَلُّ (ellü) | аллӑ (allă) | *ellig | to die | وَل (vel) | вил (vil) | *öl- |
hundred | جُور (čǖr) | ҫӗр (śĕr) | *yǖŕ | to migrate | كُوَج (küveč or köč) | куҫ (kuś) | *köč- |
Case | Volga Bulgar | Examples in words |
---|---|---|
Genitive | -∅ or -(ı)n | اَغَان (ağā-n), يغقوُتن (yaquut-ın) |
Accusative | -ne/na | مَسجِدسَمنَ (mesčidsem-ne) |
Dative-locative | -a/e and -ne/na | اِشنَ (iš-ne), بَجنَ (bač-na), جَالَ (čāl-a) |
Ablative | -ran, -ren; -tan, -ten | دنيَارَان (dönyā-ran) |
Third person possessive | -i, -ı; -si, -sı | هِيرِ (hīr-i), اِلغِجِسِ (ılğıčı-sı) |
Tenses and moods | Volga Bulgar | Examples in words |
---|---|---|
Past tense | -ti/tı, -ri/rı | وَلتِ (vel-ti) |
Past tense 2 | -ruvı/rüvi (<*-dugı), -tuvı/tüvi (<*-tugı) | كُوَجروُي (küveč-rüvi), بلطُوى (bal-tuvı) |
Adjective form of verb | -an/en | طَنَان (tan-an), سَوَان (sev-en) |
Adverb form of verb | -sa/se | بَرسَ (bar-sa) |
Third person imperative | -tur/tür | طَنْطُرْ (tan-tur) |
See also
Notes
- ^ a b Encyclopædia Britannica Online – Bolgar Turkic Archived 2008-06-23 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Marcantonio, Angela. The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics. Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2002. page 25
- ^ a b Johanson, Lars. 1998. "The history of Turkic." In: Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 1998. The Turkic languages. London: Routledge, pp. 81–125."Turcologica". Archived from the original on 8 April 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2007.; Johanson, Lars. 2007. Chuvash. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier.
- ^ Заходер, Б. Н. (1962). Беляев, Е.А. (ed.). Каспийский свод сведений о Восточной Европе : Горган и Поволжье в IX-X вв (in Russian). Vol. I. Москва: Восточная литература. p. 238.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 December 2016. Retrieved 2 January 2017.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ The Turks: Early ages, Vol. 1 , Cem Oğuz, ISBN 9756782552, Author Murat Ocak, Redactors: Hasan Celāl Güzel, Cem Oğuz, Osman Karatay, Publisher: Yeni Türkiye, 2002, p. 535.
- ^ The Hunno-Bulgar language, Antoaneta Granberg, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 November 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2015.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "Old Bulgar words from VI-X c. AD sources". www.kroraina.com. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
- ^ Бакалов, Георги. Малко известни факти от историята на древните българи Част 1 Archived 2015-09-24 at the Wayback Machine част 2 Archived 2007-12-01 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Димитров, Божидар, 2005. 12 мита в българската история
- ^ Милчева, Христина. Българите са с древно-ирански произход. Научна конференция "Средновековна Рус, Волжка България и северното Черноморие в контекста на руските източни връзки", Казан, Русия, 15.10.2007
- ^ Detrez has specialisized Bulgarian philology at Sofia University and is author of several books treating Bulgarian history Archived 2013-10-02 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Detrez, Raymond; Plas, Pieter; Lang, Peter (2005). Developing cultural identity in the Balkans: convergence vs divergence. Peter Lang. p. 29. ISBN 90-5201-297-0.
- ^ Бешевлиев, Веселин. Ирански елементи у първобългарите. Античное Общество, Труды Конференции по изучению проблем античности, стр. 237–247, Издательство "Наука", Москва 1967, АН СССР, Отделение Истории.
- ^ Йорданов, Стефан. Славяни, тюрки и индо-иранци в ранното средновековие: езикови проблеми на българския етногенезис. В: Българистични проучвания. 8. Актуални проблеми на българистиката и славистиката. Седма международна научна сесия. Велико Търново, 22–23 август 2001 г. Велико Търново, 2002, 275–295.
- ^ Съпоставително езикознание, Том 30, Софийски университет "Климент Охридски", 2005, стр. 66–68.
- ^ Исторически преглед, Том 62, Броеве 3–4, Bŭlgarsko istorichesko druzhestvo, Institut za istoria (Bŭlgarska akademia na naukite) 2006, стр. 14.
- ^ Palaeobulgarica: Starobŭlgaristika, Том 24, Tsentŭr za bŭlgaristika (Bŭlgarska akademiia na naukite), 2000, стр. 53.
- ^ "Образуване на българската народност. Димитър Ангелов (Издателство Наука и изкуство, "Векове", София, 1971) стр. 117". kroraina.com. Archived from the original on 28 May 2013. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
- ^ "Образуване на българската държава, Петър Петров (Издателство Наука и изкуство, София, 1981) стр. 94". kroraina.com. Archived from the original on 12 February 2012. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
- ^ Karloukovski, Vassil. "V. Zlatarski – Istorija 1A – a 1". www.kroraina.com. Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
- ^ "Медното гумно на прабългарите, Ivan Benedikov, (College "Thrace" publishing house, I edition 1983, II. reworked edition, Stara Zagora 1995, pp. 16–19". kroraina.com. Archived from the original on 20 June 2012. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
- ^ Curta, Florin; Kovalev, Roman (2008). The Other Europe in the Middle Ages: Avars, Bulgars, Khazars and Cumans. Brill. p. 189. ISBN 978-9004163898.
- ^ Rance, Philip,"Photios and the Bulgar Language (τῶγα, tuğ)" Byzantinoslavica 79 (2021) 41–58
- ^ a b c Tekin, Talât (1987). Tuna Bulgarları ve Dilleri (in Turkish). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
- ^ Clark, Larry. 1998. "Chuvash." In: Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 1998. The Turkic languages. London: Routledge, p.434
- ^ Campbell, George L. Compendium of the World's Languages. Routledge, 2000. page 274
- ^ "Формирование болгарской (древнечувашской) народности". Archived from the original on 30 September 2007.
- ^ a b c HAKIMZJANOV, F. S. "NEW VOLGA BULGARIAN INSCRIPTIONS." Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 40, no. 1, Akadémiai Kiadó, 1986, pp. 173–77, [1].
- ^ a b c Tekin, Talât (1988). Volga Bulgar kitabeleri ve Volga Bulgarcası. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. pp. 30–38. ISBN 978-9-751600-660.
- ^ A Volga Bulgarıan Inscription From 1307 A. Róna-tas
- ^ Unpublished Volga Bulgarian inscriptions A. H. Khalikov and J. G. Muhametshin
- ^ "Закиев М. З. Лингвоэтнические особенности волжских булгар — главного этнического корня татар". bulgarizdat.ru. Retrieved 24 August 2021.
- ^ "Category:Bulgar numerals – Wiktionary". en.wiktionary.org. 31 July 2021. Retrieved 24 August 2021.
- ^ "Proto-Turkic/History of Proto-Turkic language – Wikibooks, open books for an open world". en.wikibooks.org. Retrieved 24 August 2021.
- ^ "Numbers in Chuvash".
External links
- Britannica Online – The article describes the position of Bulgar and Chuvash in the classification of the Turkic languages.
- "Sergei Starostin's Tower of Babel" (PDF). – A Russian Turkologist's take on Danube Bulgar inscriptions and the Bulgar calendar, in Russian. The article contains a tentative decipherment of inscriptions based on the Turkic hypothesis. (350 KiB)
- Rashev, Rasho. 1992. On the origin of the Proto-Bulgarians. p. 23–33 in: Studia protobulgarica et mediaevalia europensia. In honour of Prof. V. Beshevliev, Veliko Tarnovo – A Bulgarian archeologist's proposal. The author concedes that the ruling elite of the Bulgars was Turkic-speaking as evidenced by the inscriptions etc., but stipulates that the bulk of the population was Iranian.