Jump to content

Talk:2009 in music

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mastodon

[edit]

Mastodon are releasing a new album, Crack the Skye on March 24. Add that to the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.117.14 (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Underwood

[edit]

Carrie Underwood - Carnival Ride - 8-Track Tape will be Realeased at Wal-Mart in January 2, 2009

I'm not sure what you're referring to, as it seems that all the myriad versions of this album have been released over the past two years. However, it does seem that her third album may be released in 2009. That can be added to the list if anyone can find a reliable source for it. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl Jam

[edit]

Pearl Jam's upcoming ninth studio album has no release date, but there are sources that say that it will possibly or probably be released in 2009. Of course, since this is still uncertain, should we hold off on adding it to the list? A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa "Left Eye" Lopes

[edit]

Eye Legacy comes out on January 27. I don't see it on here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingky3575 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Varsity Fanclub

[edit]

According to Amazon.com it says their release is delayed to May 26, 2009 --Patches9713 (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Top Ten chart

[edit]

About the chart I would like to know: how do you know the exact numbers? Who publish this information? 21:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taltalla (talk • contribs)

Lily Allen

[edit]

Lily Allen made probably the biggest jump in any charts history! Her song "The Fear" went from number 167 to number 1 in the UK on February 2, 2009. This is probably music history I think it is important you put this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pugalug (talk • contribs) 17:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why this article locked?

[edit]

I'm responsible for January entry on this article and I think the whole article should be open to anyone to edit the entry just like in 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Demetrius02 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arctic Monkeys, Kasabian

[edit]

no mention of them ?? whay not there confirmed to have albums this year?

Separate article for list of 2009 songs on record

[edit]

The list has potential to be extremely long and clutter the page, so I created a new one specifically for that material. It is being contested as of now, so anyone that has sources, and wants to help add new songs to the list is welcome. (Tigerghost (talk) 20:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Currently, my subpage for the Top music hits on record in the world (2009) article is being contested. If anyone can find sources for the material that would be helpful. However, if the page is deleted I will replace it back onto this page; I created a backup in case. I do not believe that anyone on Wikipedia has ever heard of the word structure and organization before though, so I guess the 2009 in music page will continue to be an extremely long article. Thank you. (Tigerghost (talk) 12:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

K-OS

[edit]

Just a discrepancy. It states that his new album, "YES!" will be released on March 31st on this page. However, the page for the album states that it will be released on April 14th, which is also confirmed by the iTunes store. Someone change this. 68.147.202.199 (talk) 23:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Classical music

[edit]

This section should be expanded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.189.137 (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga, Katy Perry

[edit]

Have also won awards.

Not too long ago Lady Gaga and Katy Perry received Eska awards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.91.223.175 (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add it, with references of course--24.255.246.241 (talk) 03:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Returning performers?"

[edit]

What does this even mean? How do we determine that an artist has been inactive long enough to count it here? It has The Offspring (first tour since 2005) even though they released an album last year. How important is it really that it's their first tour in four years? Especially if they released an album last year? I think this entire section is kind of ridiculous. bob rulz (talk) 01:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Returning after a substantial time away is important enough to warrant the section. However, there needs to be some kind of definition as to how long an act has to have been inactive for to qualify for a place in the section. Information yes (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe declaring some artist as a "returning performer" has something to do with that artist declaring to be on hiatus regardless the time that is going to be spent on that situation and then coming back with either a new work (album in this case), or anouncing dates for a new tour. Just an opinion. If that argument has any grounds, it'd be really useful to put them somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.201.5.216 (talk) 01:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Events

[edit]

What constitutes an important music event? Some of the events listed are ridiculous. "P.O.D. releases fourth single." I don't see how that qualifies. 69.19.14.44 (talk) 00:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There should be guidelines to determine what is notable enough for this article. Otherwise musicians, fans and management companies will add all kinds of trivial things here. Information yes (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super Monday...or Week?

[edit]

I guess that Universal Music Group moved a lot of the album releases scheduled for November 24th to November 23rd. This is the US Thanksgiving weekend and they think that an extra day will boost sales with the first official week of the shopping season. However, there are other artists releasing albums that Monday or Tuesday who are not on any of Universal's labels, including Shakira and Britney Spears. So should we just label it "Super Monday" or something to represent all the major acts releasing that week? ---Shadow (talk) 03:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Albums released

[edit]

It was probably done to reduce clutter, but with all those albums and references deleted, the "list of albums" 2009 page is the only source left and it is waaaaaaaay less complete than this page was. I was going to propose that we move the table here and arrange the albums much like the old pages (2003 in music, 2004 in music, the 1990s music pages, etc.). We really don't need a second page just for the albums, at least not for 2009. (2010 on looks to be much different now.) I'd hate for myself or anyone else to have to rummage around for a long list just to add it to the albums page when that table is very sloppy and has no references. A lot of what I'm saying probably makes no sense, but there were still albums to add with references and now we can't do that. If you look at a page like 2004 in music for example, that's the way the tables should've been done all along. Just my two cents. What should we do? 96.250.1.76 (talk) 04:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained some over at Talk:List of albums released in 2009#Style of tables/proposal of merging pages. —Akrabbimtalk 14:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2009 in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2009 in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2009_in_music&oldid=1196554501"