Talk:Badhshala

A fact from Badhshala appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2013 Nepali historical drama Badhshala was briefly banned by the Nepali Army because the actors wore military uniforms without permission?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Badhshala.

Wikipedia

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that 2013 Nepali historical drama Badhshala was briefly banned by the Nepali Army because the actors wore military uniforms without permission? Source: Rana, Trishna (2013). "Arms and the men". Nepali Times. Retrieved 21 October 2020. "The NA initially said it objected because the actors wore military uniforms without permission."

Reviewed: Turritopsis dohrnii

Created by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 15:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: All OK, assuming it is normal not to have sources for the synopsis in a film page. DrThneed (talk) 04:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey DrThneed, the plot does not require sources because works of fiction are primary sources in their articles. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 06:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA Thanks, that's what I suspected. DrThneed (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Am reviewing for DYK. There is a sentence in the synopsis that doesn't quite make sense: "It shows that innocents and Maoists detainees were forced to sign a paper saying that they were Maoists whom were later killed by the army in a jungle."

As it reads you are saying that the paper had written on it that these people would be killed by the army in the jungle. I imagine the paper didn't actually say that. Presumably it is more likely that they were forced to sign a paper saying that they were Maoists, and were later killed by the army in the jungle. Please clarify though as I won't change it myself not having seen the film and possibly having misunderstood what was meant. DrThneed (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]