Talk:Battle of Fariskur (1250)

Kurdistan Low‑importance

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African / Medieval / Early Muslim / Crusades

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)
	Crusades task force

Middle Ages: Crusades Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 6, 2012, April 6, 2017, and April 6, 2021.

Arabic names

Samsam, nice work on these crusade articles, but I am wondering if it is necessary to insert Arabic names into the text. Most people probably won't be able to read them anyway (even if they have the right fonts to see the text in the first place!). If we should keep them in, I think it would be better to separate them with brackets, rather than simply insert them in the middle of a sentence. Adam Bishop (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adam Bishop, how are you i did not see you for a long time. I insert the names in Arabic because the names in English spelled often in different ways ( even sometimes wrong )thus I confirm the name and I think it might be usefull for those who can read Arabic. I understand your point. Let us think what to do. you think if we put arabic names between barkets is ok ? or maybe under notes ? let me know and maybe other people have other suggestion. anyway I wait for your suggestion and of others. Samsam22 (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've separated them with brackets for now, what do you think? Adam Bishop (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think looks good. thnx Samsam22 (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with ref

There are cases where text is surrounded by >ref< >/ref< and therefore hidden. I fixed some. Others need to be fixed. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 01:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Historical consequence (sic!)

The section is filled with dates and events prior to 1250. Is this a misunderstanding of the word "consequence"? It seems to me that parts of the article need more careful attention to sequence of events.Vicedomino (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]