Talk:Lana Rhoades

Reviewer Note

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lana Rhoades (4th nomination).

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lana Rhoades (2nd nomination).

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lana Rhoades.

See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 October 30.

There is currently a redirect from Lana Rhoades to List of Penthouse Pets. The redirect is currently protected due to repeated re-creation. That protection should be left in place. It is still in order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert McClenon (talk • contribs) 07:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Inclusion of names and family information

Archived BLPN discussion [1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 September 2023

kindly request the addition of Emily Rhoades to Lana Rhoades' Wikipedia page. Emily Rhoades is the half-sister of the adult film star Lana Rhoades, and she has made a name for herself as a Twitch streamer and an emerging content creator on TikTok, under the username 'EmaAhri'. This noteworthy connection sheds light on Lana Rhoades' family and her sister's activities in the online content creation space. KarlieKenzie (talk) 04:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Please review WP:BLPNAME and provide reliable sources for this addition. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

March 10, 2024 revert

Three different edits were reverted in one edit with the terse edit summary "Please discuss changes on talk page". So this discussion is to give an opportunity to raise objections to any of the three edits that were reverted:

1. Use of the zoomed in photo file:Lana Rhoades cropped.jpg over the zoomed out photo file:Lana Rhoades 2-2017.jpg in the infobox
2. Addition of the birth name which uses the same reference as the birth date
3. Addition of details of "incident involving another performer".

Up the Walls (talk) 21:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Banana Republic/Archive#18 March 2024. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

I object to all three edits.

1. Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. The image has been here from the start, the picture has the longstanding consensus of editors. You will have to convince me why your picture is more appropriate.
2. Birth name discussion has been covered on the talk page already (Talk:Lana_Rhoades#Unreferenced_BLP_information). You removed the editor note which suggested that you should see WP:BLPPRIVACY before adding a birth name. Allow me to point out a poignant excerpt from that page "The standard for inclusion of personal information of living persons is higher than mere existence of a reliable source that could be verified". Also see WP:BLPNAME: "When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context."
3. Details of the incident should handled with WP:DUE weight. Given that it is a a contentious potentially one-sided and badly sourced statement, we should be sensitive about what impression is given. If people are interested in learning more, they are free to follow the reference. Also WP:BLPCRIME.

Pabsoluterince (talk) 01:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

#WP:Wikipedia is not censored, but the cleavage adds no pertinent information about her. Any reader that wants to see cleavage or more can easily find it on the net. In my opinion, an image that zooms in on her face actually provides more information. ::::#There are multiple references that uses her birth name: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], so I don't think "not been widely disseminated" applies ::::#Seems to me that covering the issue with only 15 words conforms to WP:DUE. It is properly presented as a mere allegation, confirming to WP:BLPCRIME.

Up the Walls (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Banana Republic/Archive#18 March 2024. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

1. Given that she is notable for being a pornstar, you could argue that her cleavage adds pertinent information. Regardless, we don't crop people's bodies out of images.
2. You ignored the other half of the quote, it has also been intentionally concealed, such as ... [her] occupation. With regard to wide dissemination, the requirement for inclusion of her name is that it has been "widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public", as per WP:BLPPRIVACY.
3. Per BLP:CRIME "editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed or is accused of having committed a crime, unless a conviction has been secured." The accusation of assault is an accusation of having commited a crime. Furthermore at the top of the page it says, "[c]ontentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous." I couldn't find a reliable source that was able to confirm the sentence as you left it.

Pabsoluterince (talk) 06:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm not aware of any policy or guideline that says we don't crop people's bodies out of images. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a softcore porn site. Unless a published, reliable source states that Rhoades' chest is specifically noteworthy, there is no pertinent information to be conveyed by showing more skin. The subject's face is the actual identifying and illustrative feature in the photograph, and the WP:ONUS is on those who wish to include the cleavage photo to obtain consensus. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Notes

How could she film nearly 5000 video in only two years

Filming 5000 in 2 years means she made 7 films each day Its nearly impossible how is that 151.236.165.100 (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)