Talk:Sabana Grande, Caracas

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 23 March 2018 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Venezuela Mid‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sabana Grande, Caracas received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sabana Grande, Caracas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QuinteroP (talk · contribs) 08:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Journalists in Sabana Grande 2017.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A review of the article is requested

Please, I kindly ask the Wikipedia staff to proofread the article. I have cited dissertations, degree projects, press articles, architecture magazines, and more. One Wikipedia user had deleted all my work and just left 12 sources, not even the most relevant.

QuinteroP (talk) 10:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@QuinteroP: Why did you write to 14 editors and didn't ping me? The edit was not vandalism, and you have already opened a peer review of the article. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have been following your contributions since the mess you left in es.wiki QuinteroP. In short, per WP:NOTESSAY, I think you don't fully grasp how reliable sources works and how to write an encyclopedic article, meaning that is quite darn different from the «tesis de grado» about Sabana Grande that you are trying to pull in here. I am totally behind the aproach of blowing it up and start over,--Oscar_. (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamez42 and Oscar .: Could you perhaps start with summarizing what is so terrible about the previous version that you find it important to remove so much content? I am unable to find this explanation anywhere, but maybe I'm overlooking something obvious. Thanks. effeietsanders 02:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Effeietsanders: Hi! The summary of the peer review so far is that the article is too long, is written like a travel guidebook, "contains lots of trivia, statements that are unsourced or from unreliable sources, and personal opinion" (violating WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTPLUG). Citing an example given in the review, this article is twice as long as Caracas', and this article is about a neighborhood in the city. I think the best option is moving this version to the main contributor's workspace. --Jamez42 (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And to be noted that this is a translation from Spanish and QuinteroP was challenged about the poor quality of his contributions in Spanish many, many times. In response he simply decided to leave, hopefully he now will listen. --Oscar_. (talk) 11:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review

@QuinteroP: Hi! Any thoughts? You wrote to 14 admins and started a peer review of the article, yet you haven't commented on the insights so far. --Jamez42 (talk) 06:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]