Jump to content

User talk:Reach Out to the Truth/Archives/1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Reach Out to the Truth/Archives, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 13:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Cigarroa Middle School

Hello Reach Out to the Truth, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Cigarroa Middle School - a page you tagged - because: A7 does not apply to schools. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 01:54, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

How Do I Retire

Hi I was just wondering how to retire. If you would please tell me on my talk page atUser Talk: Zalar. Thankyou.

Not You

Please do not take that the wrong way I was talking about me for just putting the letters kg on my article. Go ahead and delete it. I will try and do better in the future. Thank you for telling me how to retire. I was just wondering in case i ever do. Please tell me what you think of me on my talk page. I am sure your good.

Please Help

How do you put templates on pages. This is the last thing i will ever ask you. From User Zalar I am a man.

I Am new to this this is why i am asking for so much help

How do i get curly brackets on your computer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zalar (talk • contribs) 02:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

November 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Simba, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

Speedy deletion declined: Littlewoods Index

Hello Reach Out to the Truth. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Littlewoods Index, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The page you want to move here is a redlink. This page seems to exist. Do you just want to move this page to Index (retailer)? In which case, you can just move it, no need for an admin. Thank you. GedUK  20:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edem

Hi, I just saw your message. I understand what you are saying but at the same time you have to understand that this is a small community in Nigeria still coming up. The references are government, banks, churches and even National dailies in some cases. There is also an ISBN registered book that refers to the place thus I believe these are sufficient. It might not have as much information as New York or London but it does exist. Below are some more links that I found.

http://www.nsukkaonline.net/profiles.htm He is the current Igwe of Ozi-Edem

http://www.nigeria-law.org/Okori%20Nwaezema%20&%20Ors%20%20V%20%20Obeta%20Nwaiyeke%20&%20Ors.htm

Google this link http://www.budgetoffice.gov.ng/pub/sqw.pdf, open the pdf file then go to (page 31 second paragraph). It's the National Budget with Edem listed.

http://allafrica.com/stories/200506130552.html (Nsukka East LG written there is a mistake)

http://ndn.nigeriadailynews.com/templates/default.aspx?a=15995&template=print-article.htm (Refers to a zone of Edem, Akpa-Edem).

http://www.flickr.com/photos/edeminvestmentanddevelopmentauthority/4022505376/in/photostream/ this is a flickr photostream of Edem.

Let me know if you need more information. Thanks.(Eidaofedem (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC)).

Hi, found another link. This is a case study on rural banking in Edem and other communities.

http://www.unn.edu.ng/home/index2.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=20866&Itemid=306

Thanks. (Eidaofedem (talk) 08:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)).

Hi, one more link mentioning the community secondary school in Edem.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18480226/List-of-Public-Secondary-Schools-in-Nigeria

Thanks. (Eidaofedem (talk) 09:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)).

Thanks

Thanks for keeping an eye on my Userpage and reverting that vandalism. HistoryStudent113(talk to me) 22:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

COnfirmation

Hi,

Just wanted to confirm if the information I provided is ok with and whether I can take down the message about deletion on the article. Thanks. (Eidaofedem (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)).

I wouldn't advise taking down the notice yet. It is supposed to stay up until the discussion is closed by an administrator. Deletion discussions usually run for seven days, but could go longer or shorter than that depending on the situation. It has only been three days and we're the only two people to have commented on the discussion, so it's unlikely that a decision would be made this early. Reach Out to the Truth 21:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, that's ok. Just let me know if you need more information. Thanks.(Eidaofedem (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)).

Wikiout

WuhWuzDat 05:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Your rollback request

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 10:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:VG/D cleanup

Thanks for cleaning up the closed section. I've been a little off lately. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem. It happens from time to time. :) Reach Out to the Truth 16:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

Thanks Reach Out to the Truth

Thanks for correcting the typo in my artical HP Pavilion dv 1658. HP dv 1000 (talk) 05:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)HP dv 1000HP dv 1000 (talk) 05:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

WTF?

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sound masking has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 19:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Did you actually read this? Are you an admin? --Avé 19:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Oops. I don't know what happened there, but it obviously wasn't supposed to happen. Sorry about that. I've reverted my edit. Feel free to remove the message from your talk page. Reach Out to the Truth 19:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

no problem. --Avé 19:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

re: repalcement of warning at User talk:24.15.188.251

I must politely but firmly ask for an explanation as to why my level 2 warning was deleted, and replaced with your level 2 warning. This IP's last vandal warning (a a level 1) was only 5 days ago. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The warning was automatically included with my reversion of that edit. It seems that you must have added the warning after Huggle opened the page for editing but before it was actually saved. Reach Out to the Truth 05:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for that ... darn vandals move too quick to be caught. Feel free to drop a level 3 over there if you want .... Best of luck in continued vandal busting. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Warning for blanking MY own User Page

? What? I can do whatever I want to my own User Page- it was written by me. Genjix (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh, it was you? That's perfectly acceptable then. You weren't logged in, so I didn't realize it was you. Page blanking is one of the things that vandals like to do, so I revert when that happens. Reach Out to the Truth 04:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

XP

YOU ARE A FREAKING NERD. THBPPPBBTHHH!!!!!!!!! XP AT LEAST I ACTUALLY HAVE A LIFE, UNLIKE YOUU!!!!!!!!!! XPPP —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jas95 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You have been keeping me really busy at WP:AIV Good work tonight. Trusilver 04:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)


Brendan Burke

Your comment was precisely the point I was trying to make. You did it with greater clarity, sharper accuracy and far fewer words than I used, so I thank you for your eloquence. Lou2u (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Yongle the Great

Thanks for spotting this. I'm a bit mortified that I didn't. Anytime you see a suspected sock of Yongle the Great, could you let me know, and if I don't act (ie if I'm not around), let user:EyeSerene who originally blocked him know. The guy edits daily with at least one sock, I did wonder where he'd been recently. How'd you notice? He drives me nuts. Dougweller (talk) 06:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I just happened to be monitoring Recent Changes with Huggle when I noticed this user's suspicious edits. If I see this happening again I'll be sure to let you know. Reach Out to the Truth 14:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
The Recent changes Barnstar
thanks again, well done Dougweller (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Thanks for keeping an eye out on that anon user that was vandalizing articles and blanking my talk page. Appreciate the lookout :) Srobak (talk) 17:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem. :) Reach Out to the Truth 17:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Wyclef Jean

I di not vandilse the page!!!

I did not vandalise or blank your page. What is wrong with you people? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.186.229 (talk) 16:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I was tring to experiment in the sandbox. Anyway I have not blanked or disrupted your page please do not stop me from editing!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.186.229 (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

de Clare

Thanks for your help on de Clare! Mugginsx (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Re-naming of the de Clare article

It seems crazy to me - the whole idea. But whatever your opinion, would you please weigh in on this discussion? Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 February 15 The category is entitled Category: House of Clare. Thanks Mugginsx (talk) 22:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Seems that I misunderstood the discussion but I still hope your will give your opinion if you find time. Mugginsx (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I've no opinion on the matter. I merely reverted vandalism on the de Clare page. Reach Out to the Truth 22:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandal that you just warned

User talk: 24.68.198.59 I hate it when someone reverts right at the same time as me. I would have given him a uw-3. Would that have been fair?

Buggie111 (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I realized afterward that I should have started with a higher warning level. But the user's been blocked now anyway. Reach Out to the Truth 22:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Help Revert Vandalism on Iman (model) Page

Can you please help me revert vandalism on page Iman (model)? Multiple edits by User_talk:65.175.139.18 should be removed and the user warned. I noticed that you have warned this user before. I do not have any experience with using these templates and could use some assistance from an expert. Thank you! DutchTreat (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Not to worry. This revert task was completed by someone else. DutchTreat (talk) 12:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

Help with Vandalism of Ken Griffey Jr Article

Hi There! I saw that you helped out with reverting edits from a vandal on the caveman page. I follow some of that vandals other edits, and found numerous problems in the Ken Griffy Jr article. Are you able to revert multiple edits? If so, please help me out by reverting all of the recent edits to the last edit by an established user. These edits are obvious vandalism, which is of course a huge problem on a BLP. Thanks! CoolMike (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Reverted to Jauerback's version. Reach Out to the Truth 23:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

i didn't vandalise anything

Your delusion of authority should not be used as an excuse to take down a tribute from fans. Please think to yourself what sagan would do and realise you are being a silly person =] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.65.99 (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Read what Ronhjones said. Wikipedia isn't for fan tributes. Reach Out to the Truth 00:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I think I just got an example of how vandals dislike being warned. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I know how that is, too. I had to go so far as to semiprotect my userpage... -RadicalOne•Contact Me•Chase My Tail 00:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
My user page is a redirect to my talk page, so most user page vandals end up on my talk page where I can receive notification of their vandalism. I did get user page vandalism once though. Reach Out to the Truth 00:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Good idea...unless you want to keep info on your userpage! Still, thanks. You're fast on Huggle; I kept going to revert a page and then see you do it! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging

Hi there, Thanks for tagging my articles I was just about to tag them myself. NavalC 05:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage recently, it was so quick and efficient I didn't even notice it had occured till now! Happy editing to you, --Taelus (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

2010 fifa article world cup

you say even national team list i cant add? this is not information for you? this isnt not a guide, this is part of the games features.

go look at Pro Evolution Soccer 2010 page. it has national teams list.

dont be hypocrites.

btw, you can ban this IP, it dont really matter. its from a hotel and so many people use it. ta! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.201.1.220 (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Problem accepting password

Very recently, in the last two weeks, I have been "logged off" in the middle of editing. Also, as recently as this morning, and at least three times previously, my password, though I correctly inserted it repeatedly, would not be accepted. Then, it goes to what looks like a Wiki page but it asked for my username and password, (not the "create account page"). Since I have never seen this page until recently, and since it asks for my username and password, which it never did before, I go out of Wiki and come back in. The same happens even after restarting computer. Then, suddenly, at some later point in time, it will take the password, either alone or (only sometimes) after security writing is inserted as shown. It has happened too many times to be a coincidence. My computer is new within the year and my security software is in place, and since I have had no other problems on other internet sites, I wonder if this is some kind of vandalism within Wiki site. Would be grateful for any advice or investigation. Thank you Mugginsx (talk) 11:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Seems fixed for now. Thanks Mugginsx (talk) 09:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

  1. Proposal to Close This RfC
  2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for reverting my user page. something lame from CBW 20:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

TUSC token 09b38c4096eb7a88dc8355583963cb96

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

RE: Whiskey Media References

In most cases they tell me themselves, then I get confirmation from the other staff. In Daniel Miesner (Riezner)'s case he actually told me around August 2009 when he commented on a Comic Vine article. When I saw his staff tag I immediately didn't recognise him as a programmer so I asked him and he said he was the Marketing Manager. Then when Tony tweeted about him bringing some beer into the office about 25 minutes a go I checked his Twitter account to make sure I was following him and noticed his real name, Daniel Miesner, didn't ring any bells concerning the Whiskey Media wiki page, so I added him.

When other people add them (which I assume it's themselves if it isn't you) I go get confirmation from Sara or Gia depending on which site has the change. For example, as far as I was aware Kane was still with WM so it was quite a surprise when his name had gone and replaced with Joey's. One quick PM to Sara and she confirmed that Joey is the new Video producer for CV.

That reminds me, I need to ask around about this Joshua Yanchar Engineer who appeared without me knowing about him (unless, again that was you).

Update: Apparently Joshua has been at WM for a while now - http://www.meetup.com/The-San-Francisco-Django-Meetup-Group/members/11311710/

FLStyle (talk) 01:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Hm, I see. That doesn't really sound verifiable by Wikipedia's standards. You might want to ask them to publish that information so it can be cited, otherwise it's just original research. Reach Out to the Truth 02:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I've got in touch with Joshua and asked about updating staff additions in the form of the whiskeymedia.com/about page, that's probably the only thing I can think of that they could do. They might do it or they might not, time will tell. But other than that it's up to you whether the additions stay up or have to be removed.FLStyle (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Rollback abuse

You do know rollback is for clear cut vandalism only, don't you?--Lorson (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

"Provided that an explanation is supplied in an appropriate location, such as at the relevant talk page, rollback may also be used in circumstances where widely spread edits (by a misguided editor or malfunctioning bot) are judged to be unhelpful to the encyclopedia, since such edits would be tedious to revert manually." From Wikipedia:Rollback feature. Reach Out to the Truth 15:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
You didn't read the Wikipedia:Rollback_feature#Mass_rollbacks section? "Rollbacks may be used, with caution, if a large number of non-vandalism reverts need to be carried out (for instance, if a discussion agreed that a set of edits by an editor or bot need to be undone)" - where is this discussion?--Lorson (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
The discussion was at WT:WikiProject Video games. You chose to ignore it and continue removing the links without even trying to evaluate their merit on a case-by-case basis. Reach Out to the Truth 15:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
I removed them in the same way they were added. Could you show me where this discussion is that all my edits should be reverted? I can't seem to find it at WT:WikiProject Video games.--Lorson (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't think anyone said you had to be reverted, but you were asked by several people to stop and discuss the links instead. You have not done that. So I'll ask again. Please stop and attempt to discuss which links should stay and which should go. The links have been there for years and there's no consensus for removing all of them. Reach Out to the Truth 15:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

You both have to stop editing right now. We ll try to find the truth and the solution. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 16:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Please read Wikipedia:Rollback feature. Misuse may result in loosing this right. Instead of mass rollbacking Lorson you should have reported the incident. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Editor using hacked AWB code. Thanks. something lame from CBW 16:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

Monarchs of Edem

Hi, I would like to put this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:List_of_Monarchs_of_Edem_%28Eze_Edem%29) on wikipedia but it seems to have been deleted before due to some misunderstanding about references. Kindly advise on how I should get it published. Or can that particular article be revived? Thanks. (Eidaofedem (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC))

User:DragonflySixtyseven is the admin who deleted those pages. [1] Reach Out to the Truth 14:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Cheers for cleaning up my user page AIRcorn (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

Monarchs of Edem

Hi, I wrote to him but I have not heard anything at all. Is there anyone else that can review the article besides him? Thanks. (Eidaofedem (talk) 19:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC))

Becky Gable

Their arguments were incorrect: she only played one role - the motion capture for a generic female ninja for UMK3 (MKT was a compilation of the three games) and she was NOT in MKII (it was Katalin Zamiar, who is notable alright). And there's really NOTHING else.

This while even the fine article of Jax Briggs got merged. --Asperchu (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

Snowball Earth graphical timeline

Since you !voted in the WP:TFD for Template:Snowball Earth/Infobox, I thought you might be interested in considering Template:Snowball Earth graphical timeline as a replacement. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For the good work you do reverting and reporting vandals. It's appreciated. ~ mazca talk 21:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2010, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

"Vandalism"

A Just Question:

Reach Out to the Truth (ROTTT), do you simply consider any messages left on your talk page to be Vandalism? If that is the case, please say so.

64.223.101.244 (talk) 01:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Btw the vandalism on zhang he's userpage was a joke not an unconstructive edit 64.223.101.244 (talk) 01:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

delete request in talk page

request that please delete for me that talk page contents completely all,thanks, Myo007

request below talk page:

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Agga Maha Pandita —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myo007 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

I have marked it for speedy deletion, but it hasn't been handed by an administrator yet. Reach Out to the Truth 02:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
aren't you an administrator? how they gonna see it without inform them? (talk) 02:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
No, I'm not an admin. An admin will see it because it's tagged for speedy deletion and appears in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Reach Out to the Truth 02:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


Why me or you or anyone just can't delete / change or edit the talk or article or texts if found that not suit to remain in web without get assisting from administrator? so something if we want to delete / edit it do we have to request to Admin always? if deleting any texts even the own written by his/her own wishes in any where of wiki page does it become breaking the wiki rules or will be punish?

myo007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myo007 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


Delete not proceeding now:

The delete request won't work now because someone want to reverse to it there, he had first told me not to do personal attack so that i tried to cancel what my previous wrote in that discuss page so how can i understand he did himself again the word that i thought might become personal attack and i tried to edited?


if he doesn't like personal attack to someone and then why he reverse the words again and again even though i try to cancel my wrote or requested to delete.

it become against with first he wished and second he did by reversing again and again being become against of his two sayings.


i think it's should be allow to edit by someone's own previous write if he/ she thought that his/her own written was inappropriate at first and it's shouldn't take account as either vandalism since it can be his/her own wrote at first too and he/she may try to change or edit after.


is that reverse person a staff here like Mod, Admin or any staff? Because he get involve the case so he might has some reason to do so like his responsible duty as a staff.

Thanks for your help.

Myo007 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC).

The relevant guideline is WP:REDACT. It is now almost impossible to make sense of what has happened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agga Maha Pandita because of all the changes that Myo007 has made, and I have not attempted to do so. However, the comment they made at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Agga_Maha_Pandita was also pertinent, and was responded to on the main page with this edit, so should not be removed but struck. I42 (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


Then can you please just don't vote for delete and please may reshape it with any right style that it might suit please, thanks. i think it not required to delete it but can either reshape it or edit it the right way better.


also i tried to remove that discuss content that previous my own words since your said that not to do personal attack and the edit in that case i made was just because tried to listen to you as you said not to do personal attack. if i don't listen or follow anything i won't change like that or today thing happened vandalism thought also won't happen.


Thanks for your respond anyway

Myo007 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:58, 8 April 2010 (UTC).

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

Video game assessments

Hey there. Thanks for taking a look at those various game articles. I'm glad they're at least not stubs. Another editor put out a challenge to create articles for all the Game Room releases, so any support or assistance you can provide would be awesome. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 21:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

Hello

Not all of those edits were vandalism. Please only revrt the ones that were true vandalism, like "The Bang Bang callers are dumb and should rephrase". 99.38.127.97 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:23, 11 June 2010 (UTC).

Thanks

For the userpage reverts last night..crazy night Tommy2010 [message] 13:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

Wow!

You've done a great job reverting vandalism... I wanted to suggest your use of STiki as I've found it to be a very useful tool! Cit helper (talk) 23:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

I have actually used it a couple times. It does seem to be able to unearth slightly older vandalism that has gone undetected, so maybe I'll do a bit more vandalism detection with it. Reach Out to the Truth 00:17, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for your automated responce. Just a reminder, page reviewing can not be tested in the sand. You may also wish to read this related page for more information. --78.157.0.32 (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

Mario Kart 3DS Tracks

Hi. I noticed that you reverted an anon. trying to add an unsourced track list to the Mario Kart 3DS article. While I appreciate the reverts, I was confused by your edit summary here, as well as the UWs left on the talk page, both referring to requiring a source. However, per WP:NOTGUIDE, even if well-sourced directly from Nintendo, this manual-type info is not relevant or encyclopedic. Unless there is a compelling reason for inclusion, this applies to lists of playable characters, lists of tracks or worlds, styles or methods of play, tricks or codes, etc. as well. I hope you weren't actually suggesting that the user add such content to an article, even when it has been sourced; again, this would violate WP:NOTGUIDE. In the future, you may want to be more clear about what is unacceptable content to newcomers, even if the content is sourced. Thanks. DKqwerty (talk) 12:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

Re: Re: Rollercoaster World

The majority of articles about video games on Wikipedia are 'not notable' - take a look on the video game project - there's thousands of articles like Rollercoaster World, that are small and hard to find references for. It's not hidden vandalism or a parody - I don't know why you're being so deletion-happy with this. I could understand if I wrote an article about my local church or my pet Yorkshire terrier that would be 'not notable', but it's a video game - that's been published and bought by people, if any of those people wanted to find some info about it they read it here. It's not if Wikipedia has a limited on the amount of articles that can be made. It not hurting any one or thing on Wikipedia if a video game article is a little on the skinny side.
It's not nice to have someone delete something you've spent half-an-hour on, a complete waste of my time. No wonder people leave this place
--George2001hi (Discussion) 16:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

You'll notice that I did not nominate it for deletion. I merely marked it as needing references for notability. It could remain in that state for years without anyone nominating it for deletion or adding references. There's no hurry, but if you're working on the article why not look for some references?
And if you're not satisfied with Wikipedia's notability requirements, there are plenty of other wikis without notability guidelines that would happily accept the article. Reach Out to the Truth 17:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

Thanks!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 14:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

Neeeeargh!

Who are you to go against Waaaario? You probably from that worthless Mushroom kingdom! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.185.61 (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

No and no. Reach Out to the Truth 19:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for correcting my error on Stephen Colbert. Have a good day! Kushal (talk) 20:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

Recettear images

Hi Reach Out to the Truth, thanks for letting me know about the need for the additional info on the images. I am going to have a go at that now. Marmouse999 (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

-- Update, okay I have done those. The files are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Recettear_Dungeon.png and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Recettear_Shop.png. I hope I have done the correct changes, if you do get a couple of mins I wondered whether you would mind checking them out. Thanks again! I am new to Wikipedia so hope this doesn't overstep any boundaries. Marmouse999 (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I think that should be fine. Reach Out to the Truth 01:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

Thanks

The Userpage Shield
Thanks for removing the userbox off my page! iGeMiNix 02:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
No worries. -129.78.32.22 (talk) 02:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Also more thanks for your spotting and removing the personal attack from Off2riorob/talk 2, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Pawnee Bill

Can you help with vandalism on this page by Historicalidenity? 152.132.9.73 (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea what's going on with that page. I see a number of people adding and removing a bunch of stuff with no explanations. Can someone please tell me what's going on? Reach Out to the Truth 19:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I am sorry that this user believes that I am vadalizing the page. I am simply trying to correct some of the information on there that is not correct and it seems that others are not willing to let me do that. I am pleading my case to an admin so I ask that you be patient until it is all sorted out.Historicalidentity (talk) 02:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the LGBT logo on the DADT page.

First, I apologize for editing the "LGBT logo". I was unaware that my efforts to remove the LGBT logo impacted all the other locations within Wikipedia where the LGBT logo may be appropriately located. That was not my intention.

With regard to the LGBT Logo on the DADT article page; I think that is quite apparent why it is simply inappropriate to have the logo located on the DAD article page. It violates any sense of neutrality. If anything it detracts from the accomplishment itself.

I realize that you might feel that you are helping along those struggling to to repeal this blatant snubbing of our civil rights. And even though I agree with your position, it is simply inappropriate to place the LGBT logo on the same page as the DADT article. If you just take a minute to step back from situation, you will realize that I am correct.


-P4URT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Penny4URThoughts (talk • contribs) 19:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

I was never involved with this situation. I'm pretty far back already. I just want to make sure you understand that you need consensus to remove it, and that blanking a template is never the correct way of removing the template from an article. Reach Out to the Truth 19:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For being one of the few human beings who is capable of consistently beating me to reverting vandalism.I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 2 — 3rd Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2010, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

Thanks

Thanks for the reversion of the vandalism to my talk page :). Best, Mifter (talk) 17:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Same here, thanks. --Yachtsman1 (talk) 03:32, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

Speedy deletion declined: Frank Attar

Hello Reach Out to the Truth. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Frank Attar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Can't speedy a disputed PROD. Suggest sending to WP:AFD. Thank you. Nancy talk 07:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Panasonic Jungle

Hi. How do I make a 'rename request'? --Gaming&Computing (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Ah, sorry. It's called moving, not renaming. See Wikipedia:Requested moves for information on how to make a request. Reach Out to the Truth 21:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Ow, I know moving. But the problem is I can't move Jungle (video game console) to Panasonic Jungle because it is a 'redirect conflict'.
That's why you should make a request. An admin can perform the move while preserving the history of each page, or delete the other if there's nothing worth keeping and nothing to attribute. Reach Out to the Truth 22:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2010, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

Cut and paste move...

Hi there, sorry to have taken up your time- I wasn't aware of a move button. Stoopid n00bz eh? I'll get it right in future, and cheers for the heads up! Bennydigital (talk) 12:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

PvZ

fffuuuu , we both caught the move at the same time, one second apart, and now I can't find the original page.... --MASEM (t) 17:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Yikes! Where did it go? Reach Out to the Truth 17:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

Formal mediation has been requested

Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Role-playing video game has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. For an explanation of what formal mediation is, see Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy. Please now review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then, in the "party agreement" section, indicate whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.

Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 19:43, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for mediation concerning Role-playing video game, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible for this dispute to proceed to formal mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Questions relating to the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list. For more information on other available steps in the dispute resolution process, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 14:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reach_Out_to_the_Truth/Archives/1&oldid=1146681513"