User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 12

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
608	2011 Egyptian revolution (talk)	Add sources
9	Newton, New Zealand (talk)	Add sources
6	Balmoral, New Zealand (talk)	Add sources
42	Queen Street, Auckland (talk)	Add sources
10	Saint Marys Bay, New Zealand (talk)	Add sources
24	Downtown Victoria (talk)	Add sources
5	Trials and judicial hearings following the Egyptian revolution of 2011 (talk)	Cleanup
170	2012 Egyptian presidential election (talk)	Cleanup
21	Woolston, New Zealand (talk)	Cleanup
28	Afer echinatus (talk)	Expand
12	Timeline of the Egyptian Crisis under the SCAF (talk)	Expand
7	Human rights in Egypt under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (talk)	Expand
243	Viral marketing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
281	Anthem of the Sun (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
65	Cuban Liberation Army (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5	Maymorning (talk)	Merge
25	Demographic history of the Vilnius region (talk)	Merge
23	Saranga Dariya (talk)	Merge
35	2012–2013 Egyptian protests (talk)	Wikify
8	Edouard Machery (talk)	Wikify
7	William Dale Phillips (talk)	Wikify
2	Rosemary Kerwegi (talk)	Orphan
12	Shatsi Musherure Kutesa (talk)	Orphan
2	Sarah Kiyingi Musoke (talk)	Orphan
5	Al-Badeel (talk)	Stub
13	5-Benzyloxytryptamine (talk)	Stub
16	5-Carboxamidotryptamine (talk)	Stub
7	Mała Wierzyca (talk)	Stub
12	National Police Day (Egypt) (talk)	Stub
27	8-OH-DPAT (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:32:03, 16 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Mabnola

Mabnola (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael A. Preston Four Ball Rally of 1984 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't think I understand the reason my article was rejected. Throughout the article, I linked news articles from across the country about the event. Can you please help me by being more specific about what sources are not acceptable?

Mabnola (talk) 16:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome. I don't know how you had expected an editor to know that this source from NY Times was really about the event, because it used "a clandestine coast-to-coast race in record time." Therefore another source should be placed to confirm your content. The 11th source is a book with low bibliographical details. Following the need for WP:OFFLINESOURCES, it would be appreciative to include the page numbers in the book where you got your information. Reviewing the newspaper archive, I saw that you failed to include a clipping of the particular headline as was seen in "The Journal 5 June 1984 — The NYS Historic Newspapers". Also, there was same problem with the overused source "NewspaperArchive 1700s - 2024 | NewspaperArchive". Having this little coverage doesn't impress our rule for WP:NEVENT and WP:SIGCOV. Events can exist but they may not be notable for a standalone article. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

	Greetings, SafariScribe. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Gerda Arendt
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

Tol Bot (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:22:14, 18 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Ecbmlc

Ecbmlc (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Salima Suswell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, hope you are well. I appreciate your edits on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Salima_Suswell You left me this comment: Merge important details into Black Muslim Leadership Council.

Can you confirm that you mean you want me to fully merge the Salima Suswell page onto the BMLC page, instead of having a standalone Salima Suswell page? Thank you for your time.

Ecbmlc (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending thoughts. I will check the possibility. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on draft: Mary Beth Goodman bio

Hello there, as a new author who seemingly took on a bigger challenge than expected in drafting a living person’s bio, I would appreciate your advice.

What can I do to get this draft bio of Mary Beth Goodman ready for publication? You recently rejected it and in response I asked questions on the draft’s talk page about alternative sources and why the existing sources are insufficient. Perhaps you can give me more detailed feedback?

The person being profiled has mostly been a diplomat or civil servant so the sources to substantiate her bio are not diverse: they are government sources or other organizations citing the government ones—but it seems editors don’t find those credible. I don’t know how to proceed.

Your help is appreciated. 🙏 Lfdigests (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will look over, and get back to you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir/ma'am! Lfdigests (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kate Abdo

Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion.

I urge you to reopen the discussion, as this title is a clear violation of the policy at WP:NAMECHANGES. Recent secondary source articles all use "Kate Scott"[1] and her blue-check Insta is @katescott. See also WP:SPNC. 162 etc. (talk) 22:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc., thank you for the messages. My closure equally matches the obvious consensus of that discussion. Since you didn't vote, you may want to open a new RM. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment here makes me curious, are you aware of WP:RMNOMIN?

If no one has objected, go ahead and perform the move as requested unless it is out of keeping with naming conventions or is otherwise in conflict with applicable guidelines or policy. Further, any move request that is out of keeping with naming conventions or is otherwise in conflict with applicable guideline and policy, unless there is a very good reason to ignore rules, should be closed without moving regardless of how many of the participants support it. (emphasis mine)

I'm as yet undecided on whether or not this particular RM should have been closed as moved or not, but the fact that you did not attempt to question the alleged violation of policy, while justifying your closure of the move on the basis of consensus, makes it unclear if you are aware of this particular aspect of closing RMs. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 14:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual recent RM closes

You recently closed Talk:Chuck Smith (sprinter) and other RMs concerning WP:NCSP as "WP:SNOW close per 2 !vote consensus." This seems odd, as the closes were not early (all 7 days after being posted), the "2 !vote[s]" includes the nominator, and I believe SNOW would not apply with so few !votes. In fact, you could have closed that as uncontested technical requests (WP:RMNOMIN), which is quite different from SNOW. Alternatively, you could have just closed them as "moved," which perhaps would have been the best option. Sorry in advance if there's something I'm missing here. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 13:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JJPMaster, and thank you for your concerns. I expressed cautious care while moving this pages as WP:SNOW since it's obviously going to be moved. We do that sometimes, but not always, to save the community's time. That may be what you are missing hahah.Thanks though. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Xxps" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Xxps has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20 § Xxps until a consensus is reached. 65.92.246.77 (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an edit request at Talk:Hamis Kiggundu

I believe it may be valid to accept, but wish neither to accept nor decline this on. I have left a comment. Since you edited it so tightly I thought you might wish to consider it 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:Redirect assimilation" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:Redirect assimilation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 22 § Wikipedia:Redirect assimilation until a consensus is reached. Trovatore (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"WP:ASSIMILATION" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect WP:ASSIMILATION has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 22 § WP:ASSIMILATION until a consensus is reached. Trovatore (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit on Gangs of Lagos

@SafariScribe Hello

Great job on your edits to Gangs of Lagos! I truly appreciate your effort. I've further expanded the lead section with what I believe are key details that will captivate readers and encourage them to scroll down and explore more of the article. Afro 📢Talk! 17:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Things Fall Apart

The article Things Fall Apart you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Things Fall Apart for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
34	Yo-kai Watch Shadowside: Oni-ō no Fukkatsu (talk)	Add sources
270	Rokurokubi (talk)	Add sources
356	Japanese urban legends (talk)	Add sources
520	All About Lily Chou-Chou (talk)	Add sources
960	Kappa (folklore) (talk)	Add sources
145	Kodoku (talk)	Add sources
13	6-Chloronicotine (talk)	Cleanup
199	Seven Seas Entertainment (talk)	Cleanup
167	U.S. Senate report on CIA torture (talk)	Cleanup
34	Kamichu! (talk)	Expand
23	GTS-21 (talk)	Expand
103	Area 88 (talk)	Expand
712	Parody (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,374	.357 Magnum (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
956	Field hockey (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
411	White Africans of European ancestry (talk)	Merge
2,917	The Daily Wire (talk)	Merge
153	Northern Ireland flags issue (talk)	Merge
51	Funayūrei (talk)	Wikify
89	Kyivstar (talk)	Wikify
180	Yama-uba (talk)	Wikify
2	Azemiopsin (talk)	Orphan
8	Service-Telecom (talk)	Orphan
7	Hunter Haynes (talk)	Orphan
6	Monthly Birz (talk)	Stub
4	3-Bromocytisine (talk)	Stub
9	A-84,543 (talk)	Stub
12	Ōkubi (talk)	Stub
8	RJR-2429 (talk)	Stub
6	Alpha-3 beta-2 nicotinic receptor (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: London School of Economics Labour Society

Dear SafariScribe, you reviewed my article a long time ago; I have now made all changes, and was wondering if you could please review it again! Thank you! Albanians1 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

	Greetings, SafariScribe. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Usernamekiran
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

Tol Bot (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:22:53, 14 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Postcinematicbodies

Postcinematicbodies (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Trust (German organization) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Draft article declined: This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.

I noticed a key link broken so I updated - covers the organization in a paragraph and footnote. Also added award.

There several interviews (both primary and secondary) that mention the organization in several paragraphs. I saw on another article: "interviews are not inherently unreliable and can present a mix of independent secondary coverage and own statements, and all statements are verifiable consistent with WP:V and WP:RS"

Curious your thoughts on which sources are needed.

Had used wiki article as a guide for sourcing and can't tell how the sources are substantially different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Segal

Thank you very much. Postcinematicbodies (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. Sources should be reliable and may include newspapers and magazines (notable national and international), peer reviewed journals, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you!

I fixed a broken link to a peer review journal that covers the organization in a paragraph and a footnote and added a link to an award I found. I'm curious if this would help with the notability issues and I should resubmit or if I should continue collecting references?

In terms of in depth coverage - there's one peer reviewed journal, a leading digital arts magazine and a leading European fashion magazine in addition to a government award. Postcinematicbodies (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know what you think about these edits - thanks! Postcinematicbodies (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think they are ready, then resubmit and wait for acceptance or decline. However if I have the time, i would remain at the best service of helping out. Cheers. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soroush Saghafian

Hi there, can you explain your reasoning for declining this one as not meeting WP:NPROF? I wouldn't say I'm 100% confident it can't be deleted at AfD, but he certainly meets my "good enough for AfD to have a go at it" bar. -- asilvering (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering, I have seen this a long time ago but couldn't say anything. My bad, and I wish you all the best. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft page of Register.BG publication denial.

Hi SafariScribe.

Thank you for reviewing my page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Register.BG

Unfortunately I did not understand why exactly the publication was denied. I would like to ask for help publishing my article about "Register.BG". Can you please share your opinion what we can do to have this page published? The company "Register.BG" is popular in Bulgaria and it is the top level domain registry in the country. The company has its roots from the late 1980s and it has a rich history in contribution of the development the internet society. I added all possible references that I found online, however the page publication was denied. Some of the sources are very credible including the ones from ICANN - which is a well known non-profit organization selected by the US government to manage and develop the internet zone. Can you please give me an advice what else i can do to have this page accepted.

Kind Regards! Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 15:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nickpetersen2023, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for the patience of waiting for my reply; I was indeed very very busy. Your draft doesn't appear to meet WP:NCORP. Although I have this feeling that it may be notable since it operates the Bulgarian National Internet Domain Registry, I also see the blatant lack of WP:SIGCOV perhaps sources doesn't equal WP:SIRS. Sources, as you should know, helps us in determining notablity, and I wonder why you would count these unreliable sources otherwise database entries as WP:RS: ruskov-law.eu, help.superhosting.bg, www.icann.org, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer.

I tried to find more information about the company.

Can you please take a look the following references and tell me if they are acceptable:

Position 1: "Register.BG - Registration and use of domain names at ccTLD registry"

Position 10: "Bulgaria Internet Company Launches Domain Names in Cyrillic - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency".

Best Regards,

Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 14:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would check the references later. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:28:43, 16 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Frans van Zandvoort

Frans van Zandvoort (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Noord Nederlandsche P&I Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SafariScribe,

You recently rejected the page I made, which I'll link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Noord_Nederlandsche_P%26I_Club

It was declined earlier on account of an overabundance of references that weren't of solid enough quality -- so I weeded out the weak ones until only the better remained. I also took care to write the article in a neutral tone of voice, without any "peacock language". I believe the article speaks for itself in how factual it is.

Just to be clear on my position here: I've creating this page as a professional assignment by the company NNPC itself. Despite this, I understand and support the nature of Wikipedia!

If you could clarify for me what exactly it is that made you decline the page and how I could improve it for publication, I'd be very grateful. Thanks for taking the time to help!

Best wishes, Roderick Frans van Zandvoort (talk) 18:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would get back to this. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was declined as a promotional piece. For example, "The company slogan is "Worldwide. Always Around." Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aziz Ullah Khan Article

Hello! I was surprised you Rejected And they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources. He is an elected Chairman, hence, notable per This also applies to persons who have Verified Media Coverage. 103.82.253.30 (talk) 14:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. Could you link the draft here? Also, a chairman is likely going to fail WP:NPOL. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for correction it's Mayor like Mpa's https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aziz_Ullah_Khan_Marwat 103.82.253.30 (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mayors aren't usually notable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections in the article by Willfried Segebrecht

Hi SafariScribe, I have corrected the article according to your recommendations that we wrote about in the message, please check it if it is correct now. As I wrote earlier, I have written permission from the author of the website to use information from the website that I use as a reliable source. Please check, I hope that with your help the project will be accepted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Willfried_Segebrecht Best regards Grzegorz Gordonwg (talk) 09:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe, please check my article, I have improved it according to your recommendations. Gordonwg (talk) 03:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Safari Scribe Is there any way to get help? Gordonwg (talk) 13:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gordonwg, am so sorry for not responding earlier. Well, if you have resubmitted the draft, please wait, another reviewer will see it through. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't sent the project yet, I've been waiting for you. The project hasn't been sent. What do we do next? Gordonwg (talk) 08:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SafariScribe. Thank you for your work on RSS Kármán Line. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a wonderful and blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"019" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 019 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 28 § 019 until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 15:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]