Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Arcade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

X-Arcade

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGCRIT, lacks any WP:SIGCOV other than two dubious gaming magazine articles DirtyHarry991 (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Products, and Computing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If by dubious gaming magazines you mean Pcmag and IGN both have been deemed reliable by wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. ~~I’m not sure if that is enough to keep the article but thr sourcing appears to be fine unless I’m missing something~~.--67.70.101.104 (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In addition to the 2 reliable sources already in the article, there's an additional 2 reliable source reviews by Joystiq (now hosted by Engadget): [1] and Nintendo World Report: [2] --Mika1h (talk) 20:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep combining the sources in the article plus the ones added in this discussion means we have four wources deemed reliable by the wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources which should be enough to avoid deletion.--67.70.101.104 (talk) 20:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.