Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AmIAnnoying.com (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- AmIAnnoying.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real claim of notability, only one possible news hit. I don't think it comes close to the GNG standards. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep pursuant to the previous AfD which made it clear that the WP:CONSENSUS of the community is that this article is notable. 140.247.141.165 (talk) 02:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - consensus can change. Wikipedia has changed a lot since 2005 - looking at the previous AFD, it's remarkable to see an article with no sources being kept as 'notable' based purely on Google hits. Having failed to find any more sources myself, I have to agree with the nominator that by today's standards, it flatly fails WP:NOTE. Robofish (talk) 02:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - There is a coverage listed in the article in the form on a CNN link in external links. Material (some behind pay walls) such as [1], [2], [3], [4] indicate that there is coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 02:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Whpq. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Whpq's sources. I've added some of them to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.