Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora country club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora country club

Doesn't meet WP:N. gordonrox24 (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteHell in a Bucket (talk) 17:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's not hugely notable, but the Google News results [1] indicate it hosts significant events, has had some semi-notable players based at the course, has some notability for Audubon society certification etc. Established in 1914. I think it's enough for a decent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per childofmightnight. -Djsasso (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 19:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Article clearly needs a complete overhaul, but club seems to have hosted some fairly notable tournaments. _wjemather ^bigissue 10:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Could a broader catagory be created, in which this could be a subsection User:sam004 —Preceding undated comment added 15:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]