Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaya Secure Network Access
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 06:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Avaya Secure Network Access (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed prod, not finding significant, in-depth coverage in reliable sources to satisfy stand-alone notability Nouniquenames 02:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- STRONG Delete - More Avaya WP:SPAM. There are scores of articles like this. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The articles creator was blocked in 2007 for sock puppetry - PROD was contested by an IP unconnected to the article. --wintonian talk 03:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran talk to me! 09:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not a notable product. 1292simon (talk) 01:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Ottawahitech (talk) 14:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Corporate spam without encyclopedic value. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:53, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.