Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camfrog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. So Why 07:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Camfrog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the general notability guidelines. I could not find references to this software in reliable third party sources. Sjrct (talk) 19:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. - TheMagnificentist 19:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – As I recall, it was at least a semi-popular webcam program. Maybe not now so much, but it was there when video calling for social reasons became "a thing". Senator2029 “Talk” 20:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:45, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Notable per above sources. SL93 (talk) 18:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.