Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carpe Diem (media agency)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carpe Diem (media agency)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Firm does not appear to be notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable as per nominator; most sources in the article appear to simply be press releases created by the agency. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 05:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An utterly unremarkable website design business. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Still not notable, still no reliable sources here. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, almost an advert. Grillo7 (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.