Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doozy Bots
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Doozy Bots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disputed prod. Prod reason: No evidence of notability. One promo video does not grant notability. There is no evidence of coverage in any reliable source. I'll also add that the article engages in a high degree of original research and does not maintain a neutral point of view. The only thing that can be verified is what is in the trailer. --Farix (Talk) 12:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Farix (Talk) 12:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom (yes, I know WP:PERNOM is an argument to avoid, but Farix basically summed it all up), and maybe add a passing mention as appropriate to one of the Gundam articles. —Dinoguy1000 17:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete It clearly doesn't pass muster in its current form, and since the article is about a trailer for a non-notable canceled TV show, it's nearly impossible to improve or expand. The only reason given for the removal of the prod was that the editor hated to see "interesting little stubs like this" get deleted, but when even the editor who de-prodded the article acknowledged that it wouldn't survive an AfD, do we really need to take the time to do one? Gelmax (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my prod. To quote myself: No evidence of notability. One promo video does not grant notability. There is no evidence of coverage in any reliable source. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.