Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Philippe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Philippe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NPOL. Has not held office; candidate only. Searching finds only routine coverage of election. MB 20:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. MB 20:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – there's nothing more than routine local coverage of his candidacy, which generally has been considered insufficient for establishing notability. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As usual, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they have not won — the notability test for politicians is holding an NPOL-passing office, not just running for one. But nothing here establishes that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independently of running for office, and just adding a bit of purely run of the mill campaign coverage, of the type that every candidate for office always gets in their local media, would not be enough to make his candidacy more special than everybody else's candidacies. Bearcat (talk) 01:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As of now, a non-notable political candidate JW 1961^Talk 13:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails NPOL. TheDreamBoat (talk) 23:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above, also looks like an unsourced BLP, unless I missed a reference somewhere. SportingFlyer T·C 23:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article doesn't appear notable to me. Don't have any reliable sources.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.