Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahalakshmi (Tamil actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mahalakshmi (Tamil actress)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. The first source used in the article is unreliable as it lacks editorial oversight and the second is an interview which makes it not independent of the subject. She is termed a “serial actress” because she acts mostly in TV-series and not in sense of she being a prolific actress. WP:NACTOR is also not satisfied as she doesn’t feature in lead role characters. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 02:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Article does not meet GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO or NACTOR. Notability and sourcing guidelines should be strictly followed for BLPs. // Timothy :: talk 02:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.