Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Márcio Stambowsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 19:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcio Stambowsky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial artist, rank and who you trained with have no bearing on notability. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 11:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails both WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. Notability is not inherited from teachers or obtained from rank.Mdtemp (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability claims seem to be based on who he knew and who his instructor was, but notability is not inherited. No indication he ever competed at the highest level (Olympics or world championships). He's not mentioned at judoinside.com or at the ibjjf.org website. Papaursa (talk) 19:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.