Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Market7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Market7

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

typical press coverage, nothing significant about it to wrote on Wikipedia. Light2021 (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The company's own site and many of the provided references can no longer be reached. It looks like this needs to be evaluated on the basis of the company's achievements between 2007 and approx. 2011: the coverage appears to be typical start-up reviews, including the FierceCable item headlined "Top Online Video Company 2009". I don't see that as sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG, also fails WP:SPIP. Article reads like a company brochure. Wikipedia is not a marketing platform or a substitute for a corporate website. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.