Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel de Benavides Library

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nom. (non-admin closure) —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel de Benavides Library

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 16:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There isn't a lot written about this library, but I was able to find information to establish notability in secondary sources:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Less reliable sources: [9][10]. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Significant and reliable sources are added. Pampi1010 (talk) 04:07, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the library has a long history which has significance outside the university. It is a repository of important Spanish colonial era documents as noted by third-party WP:RS.

Request speedy close as keep, as nominator Clearly, the rename has wrong footed me here. The Banner talk 09:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Definitely a notable library. If I recall correctly, this library holds an original copy of Rizal's work and was covered by the news. HiwilmsTalk 09:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.