Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Baker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 15:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Samantha Baker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The references are entirely promotional, or links to where her photograph has appeared as an advertising model. I do not think there is any real notability DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. None of the references qualify as significant coverage in an independent reliable source, so the article fails WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 13:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources aside from this news item which doesn't establish notability for her as a model. -- Whpq (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - other than the Improper Bostonian and Patriot Ledger cited, none of the magazines cited are general-readership periodicals. Smells like spam. Bearian (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.