Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shan (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shan (actor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actor fails WP:Nactor#1. Minor roles in several films means nothing. The actors has supporting roles in Dora and X Videos. However, this is WP:Too soon until the actor stars in the lead roles in a film or wins an award. Also, all sources are not independent of the subject and are not in depth. Also note that the user who made the page is named Shan and his only contibution is making this page. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nominator has been indef-blocked per WP:UPE, see user's talk page for further discussion of the matter. --Finngall ^talk 15:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements. The author's username and talk page gives reason to think there is a significant COI involved in the article. // Timothy :: talk 11:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As TimothyBlue has said, the article fails the notability guidelines. I don't think anything more needs to be said about it then that. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree, it is Too soon, just because they have had a minor role does not make them inherently notable, so fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:BLP. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 09:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.