Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 60's Generation (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The 60's Generation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 18:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article does not provide any sources. I haven't found any significant coverage in reliable sources either. I don't see a reason why the subject should be considered notable per WP:GNG and WP:NTV. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Former programming by VH1 Classic. The article does not provide sources and fails both WP:GNG and WP:NTV but I think instead of deletion it should be merged with this article on programming that aired on it's channel's former name. Pahiy (talk) 01:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It was an hour of 60s videos played by a computer with no host involved. That's it. No redirect. Nate • (chatter) 01:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, No significant coverage to support notability. Alex-h (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mrschimpf (Nate). The article is just a stub. No sources, no evidence of notability. The article is dominated by three tags (including the AfD tag - okay, so four tags). Created by an IP address way back in 2005. It wasn't considered notable even back then, and that says something since Wikipedia's notability standards were different back then, and many articles have been kept because "there is coverage" or "there are reliable sources" which wouldn't be reliable now. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 10:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.