Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Clause

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE postdlf (talk) 08:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trust Clause

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A completely demented fantasia that even lacks the coherence to be a hoax. I liked the bit about Ferris wheels, though. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 04:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Incomprehensible. Pburka (talk) 15:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very bad writing joined to incompetent research. Rjensen (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
G1 speedy delete or redirect to Sanity Clause. Geez, I can't remember the last time I harvested crops of citizens or "harbored crops, felons, and pyrite". Aah, those were the good old days. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:45, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as utter nonsense. Cusop Dingle (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The "trust clause" is a term used very often in law, either if it's anti-trust or for estates/inheritance so the term is notable. Unfortunately this hoax isn't an article, so it's better off to delete and rewrite from scratch. Secret ^account 06:06, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with fire. This title should probably be redirected to Trust (law). Cheers! bd2412 T 03:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.