Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/July-2016

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2025:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Strep throat

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 15:01:04 (UTC)

Reason: An extremely good medical image, showing all the symptoms, very technically difficult to achieve.
Articles in which this image appears: Pharyngitis, Rheumatic fever, Streptococcal pharyngitis, Tonsillitis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology
Creator: James Heilman

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - Crop strikes me as a bit too tight. EV is good. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Chris Woodrich – Jobas (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I see an image of the Virgin Mary in the phlegm to the left of the uvula. Sca (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose. I'm all for good medical photography being promoted (I'm personally pretty impressed by File:Mantoux tuberculin skin test.jpg and File:Desinsertion du muscle CO.jpg, for instance), but this really isn't selling itself to me. I suppose it's a difficult genre. I would appreciate the view of some people more familiar with the area than I, though. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the image but cropped too tight per Chris. Spongie555 (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --SST flyer 16:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quorum not reached. SST flyer 16:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Suppression System for Space Shuttle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 23:02:13 (UTC)

Reason: High image quality, captures the size of humans relative to the massive flow rate of water on the pad, rare test, image is well composed. It has a free use license, per NASA policy.
Articles in which this image appears: Mobile Launch Platform, Space Shuttle, and Rocket
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – Kees08 (talk) 23:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Given the year and the fact that the Space Shuttle is no more, the flaws are excuseable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Adam. Spongie555 (talk) 06:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Adam — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sound suppression water system test at KSC Launch Pad 39A.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Equestrian Portrait of Charles V

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 03:06:09 (UTC)

Reason: High ev as lead image also amazing quality scan of the painting. Was nominated before (Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Charles V) but missed by one vote
Articles in which this image appears: Equestrian Portrait of Charles V, Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Titian

Support as nominator – Spongie555 (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 10:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, one of those terrific resolutions. Brandmeister^talk 15:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Carlos V en Mühlberg, by Titian, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg --SST flyer 03:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Tobing

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 14:37:16 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image of a notable Indonesian musician
Articles in which this image appears: Gordon Tobing
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Tati Studio; scanned and restored by — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 11:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support but could you upload the original scan and link to it? I think it's an important part of documentation. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, at File:Gordon Tobing (c. 1960) - Before restoration.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Spongie555 (talk) 04:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lemon martini (talk) 10:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gordon Tobing (c. 1960), by Tati Studios.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indriati Iskak

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2016 at 03:54:55 (UTC)

Reason: High quality, good restoration (I uploaded several of the partially done restorations so people can see just how much gunk was on this picture). Image of Indriati Iskak at the peak of her acting career, before she married, went to university, and then started working for Unilever.
Articles in which this image appears: Indriati Iskak
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Tati Photo Studio; restoration by — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks very good, but could you fix the light patches on her right (viewer left) arm, the two spots on her left (viewer right) hand, and the shadows on her skirt, leg, and shoes, which still show signs of damage, and maybe another quick pass over the left half of the background, and upload the original scan explicitly? Excellent image, but just a tiny bit more work could lift this up to incredible. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe I've done everything. Original image is at File:Indriati Iskak in a promotional still, c. 1960 - Before restoration.jpg (in all its mucky glory... that potted plant and her dress were both several hours each). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Think theleg went a little dark, so I did some fixes myself, going back to the one before the leg changed so much. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Alright. I added a few more touchups to the left background and the fence.Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 00:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Oh, I haven't supported yet, have I? Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 10:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brandmeister^talk 16:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Indriati Iskak in a promotional still (c. 1960), by Tati Photo Studio.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wreck of Cabo de Santa Maria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2016 at 15:31:20 (UTC)

Reason: A very, very good image.
Articles in which this image appears: Boa Vista, Cape Verde
FP category for this image: Unsure. Either Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water and/or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others
Creator: Ximonic, with editing by Iifar

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Impressive image. Shame the ship isn't discussed in the article. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose at this time; I agree with Chris. If the wreck/ship had its own article... Josh Milburn (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Chris, Josh. Great colors and texture, but.... Sca (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Chris – Jobas (talk) 14:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Tiny Planet" of the Last Supper sculpture in Esino Lario at Wikimania 2016

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2016 at 22:21:51 (UTC)

Reason: It is an attractive and unique visualisation of a landmark at the first Wikimania away from a city, and taken at the recently concluded Wikimania 2016.
Articles in which this image appears: Stereographic projection
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator: cmglee

Support as nominator – cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I could have sworn we already had a little planet featured.Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a little old but we do have one. (File:Globe panorama03.jpg) Spongie555 (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – the original image [1] has stitching misalignments that carry to the "Tiny planet" projection. Great composition though. On the original see (x,y) = (4220,2050), (4220,2810), (7065,1825), (7320,1825), (7470,2400), (8970,1845) all relative to top left corner of the image. Bammesk (talk) 02:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like the creative way to play with the wide angle photo and make the small town as a symbol of the warming gathering of the global wikimedia movement. --Liang (WMTW) (talk) 06:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - stitching errors, very noisy sky. --Janke | Talk 07:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other – Jobas (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - effectively combines several themes in addtion to Tiny World/Stereography, the Cenotaph of the Major/First World War War Memorial, the Last Supper/Da Vinci , Wikimania 2016, Esino Lario, the 12 Stations of the Cross, the Via Crucius and Michele Vedani. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]
- Are all of those actually out of copyright? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Might be de minimis in this case. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Aside from the technical issues I don't see what this picture adds to the EV that isn't already covered by the other FP tiny plant. Spongie555 (talk) 04:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Great concept, great composition, and topic ties in with a Wikimedia event. I disagree with above that the sky is too noisy, but the stitching error of the lamp-post is a valid concern. Deryck C. 17:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Stitching errors are too blatant. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Chris. Far from FP quality. SST flyer 08:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Thank you, everyone, for your support and critiques. I'm afraid I wasn't able to fix the stitching errors due to handheld capture, so I hereby withdraw my nomination. – cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 19:18, 8 July 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ethel Reed

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2016 at 02:32:26 (UTC)

Reason: Full of personality, interesting composition.
Articles in which this image appears: Ethel Reed
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Frances Benjamin Johnston, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 02:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, enchanting gaze. Brandmeister^talk 22:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lemon martini (talk) 10:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ethel Reed (ca. 1895) by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Loie Fuller 2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2016 at 21:50:17 (UTC)

Original – Loie Fuller is a 1901 short black-and-white silent film. The film depicts a serpentine dance by Loie Fuller.

Reason: The last time it was nominated, it barely failed. Hopefully it'll pass this time.
Articles in which this image appears: Loie Fuller, Loie Fuller (1901 film)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Segundo de Chomón

Support as nominator – GamerPro64 21:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Is there a higher resolution version available? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found two on YouTube that have higher resolution. One in black and white but no title card. The other color tinted. Don't know if the latter was color tinted in Segundo de Chomón's workshop or not. GamerPro64 02:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support, with possibility for replacement if a higher quality video is found. The title card is necessary; I'd much rather have this version. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way to stabilize the first few frames that such old movies always seem to have issue with? Nergaal (talk) 23:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per Chris, also good considering age. Spongie555 (talk) 08:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Now there's an idea to steal for the next show I have to choreograph. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 16:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Loie Fuller (1901).ogv --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meiosis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2016 at 00:06:45 (UTC)

Reason: Very encyclopedic, attractive
Articles in which this image appears: Meiosis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams
Creator: Ali Zifan

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are some capitalization issues, it seems: the word envelope in "Nuclear Envelope", "cytokinesis" in the brown label and "chromosomes" in "Metaphase II Chromosomes" all should be decapitalized. Brandmeister^talk 20:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @ Brandmeister Fixed. Ali Zifan 22:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, there's one capitalized "Cytokinesis" remaining in "Telophase I & Cytokinesis" (between Anaphase I and Prophase II). Brandmeister^talk 07:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - There is also "envelopebreaks" two words, "oppisite" misspelled, "divides" singular (under Anaphase II), "(Fragments)" doesn't need capitalization if used as a descriptor rather than a noun. Bammesk (talk) 13:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - All Done. Ali Zifan 18:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Support Brandmeister^talk 11:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Beautifully done, but still needs some work. Apart from the above mentioned,
- I think the "microtubule" label should be dropped. Since microtubules are the constituent structures of the spindle, labelling both seems redundant and confusing when provided without explanatory text.
- Could the shading be adjusted to make the attached sister chromatids more distinguishable?
- The crossing-over isn't very clear. Take a look at the bottom tetrad in prophase I. I can't quite tell which arm is attached to which. Also, in metaphase I, the crossed-over arms appear unequal.
- The aster shouldn't be shown as sun rays; they should have the same appearance as the spindle microtubules (but shorter).
- The "Homologous chromosomes" label in prophase I should probably point to each of the pairs, the way "Sister chromatids" does in anaphase I.
- Typo in the anaphase I description: should be "chromosomes", not "chrmosomes".
- The description could also be clearer. How about "separate and move" instead of just "move"?
- Probably not necessary to show the nuclear envelope forming in telophase I only to disintegrate again right away (though the illustration in Campbell's does)?
- Don't think we should say the spindle forms "around" the chromosomes (prophase I). Just forms is probably enough, or if necessary, "in each daughter cell".
- "Metaphase II" probably shouldn't be repeated in the description text.
- Minor issue, but I wonder if the central dark area in the shading of the cells is necessary. It makes the cell look like a target, and it seems to emphasise something that isn't there.
- It would also be nice to have an image of the late interphase at the beginning, to help the viewer get a picture of the "normal" stage before division, but that's just my opinion.

--Paul_012 (talk) 04:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since microtubule and spindle are not same, I thought using both of them would be better. The file is SVG so you can it can be zoomed without using quality, so by zooming, you can distinguish minor things like attached sister chromatids. The same fact is true for crossing over part. Although the asters don't used exact same color as spindle but I used orange yellow colors for both of them. I used yellow at the center because of the centriole pair. All misspellings are corrected. Homologous chromosomes label in prophase now point to each of the pairs. The diagram clearly shows that chromatids seperate during Anaphase II so I just used "move" to make text as short as it could be. The central dark area in the shading of the cells is because of the gradient that was given to make the cell more spherically and better. Interphase stage is not necessary to be shown at the beginning because meiosis contain several important stages and adding that stage would make the diagram longer and also Interphase is already depicted in mitosis diagram . Ali Zifan 19:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You think giving a timeframe/timescale would be possible? Nergaal (talk) 23:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- If I wanted to create it, I would make it as a separate file. Ali Zifan 21:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Friedan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2016 at 23:21:45 (UTC)

Reason: She launched the Second Wave of Feminism, which is rather an acomplishment; also the photo's pretty good and has a lot of characer. Might want her facing the other way, but beggars can't be choosers, as they say.
Articles in which this image appears: Betty Friedan, History of feminism, American philosophy, 9 others, and just added to The Feminine Mystique as well.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers, maybe? She kind of stands between a lot of categories - science for her psychology background, political for the NOW work, etc.
Creator: Fred Palumbo, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - We absolutely should have a featured picture of Friedan - heck, I've cited her in RL numerous times. I'm afraid this just isn't it, however. Her looking away from the camera just takes too much away from the image for me, as does the tension between her forward-facing body and side-facing head. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Chris. Also, heavy back-shadow is distracting. Sca (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Chris – Jobas (talk) 14:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Think I'll withdraw this one. It's hard to argue against objections to the pose. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 22:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Follen McKim by Frances Benjamin Johnston

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2016 at 23:11:27 (UTC)

Reason: Another of Johnston's excellent portraits. She's good at getting a lot more personality into images than was common at the time
Articles in which this image appears: Charles Follen McKim
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers, I think.
Creator: Frances Benjamin Johnston, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support though I think a bit more contrast could be had. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Try that. I didn't want to overdo it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 10:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - How do you like this? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not bad, but you didn't work from the PNG, so the archival version's now not synced to it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Right. Sorry, I forgot that you upload PNGs. Will edit that as well. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Done. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        They still weren't actually identical, so I redid it myself. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lemon martini (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spongie555 (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Charles Follen McKim by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Goliath birdeater

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2016 at 20:49:37 (UTC)

Reason: Largest known spider in the world and high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Goliath birdeater, over 100 others
FP category for this image: Animals/Arachnids
Creator: Archaeodontosaurus

Support as nominator – Brandmeister^talk 20:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Awesome picture, but the paper used as a background seems to have been quite dirty. It also seems a bit warm. Archaeodontosaurus, could the background be cleaned up a bit? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 15:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I don't mind the paper that much. Spongie555 (talk) 06:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn't reached the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kadavar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2016 at 07:29:26 (UTC)

Reason: high quality photograph of a notable band, and therefore high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Kadavar
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Menschenmaterial

Support as nominator – Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Was actually on my list of things to nominate... Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 12:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – good photo. Bammesk (talk) 13:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Kadavar-Bandfoto.jpg ---The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

5 support, 0 oppose, consensus achieved and promoted.. -The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Dahlgren

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2016 at 12:36:25 (UTC)

Reason: A fine image and restoration. This time NOT by me!
Articles in which this image appears: John Dahlgren
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
Creator: Mathew Brady, restored by Jebulon

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 12:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brandmeister^talk 10:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think you may have more than you realize here with this photo. If I am reading our article on United States Navy Admirals correctly, this was probably one of the first nine United States Navy officers promoted to the rank of admiral in US history. If the other images are of equal quality, then perhaps an image set for FP promotion should be considered. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Admiral John Dahlgren - NARA - 528718 edit.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Paul

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2016 at 19:18:18 (UTC)

Reason: It's a really impressively detailed image; Harris & Ewing would later become the largest photographic studio in the United States, and with pictures like this, it's not hard to see why. #10wikicommonsdays Day 3
Articles in which this image appears: Alice Paul et al.
FP category for this image: One could argue a few places, but as she was also head of the National Woman's Party, Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political seems reasonable.
Creator: Harris & Ewing, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Pretty great photo for 1915. Also, how about that hat? Kaldari (talk) 04:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's some uncanny white glow from her dress, maybe the highlights can be toned down a bit. Brandmeister^talk 13:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It is on the original too [2] (scanned from a negative [3]). Is the original burned to enhance lighting/contrast, or is it a lens effect, or ...? It is uncanny, although I do Support as is, given photo's age and EV (and the hat of course). Bammesk (talk) 13:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is with me turning the highlights down a bit to bring out the detail. I think it's reflecting light a bit. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Alice Paul (1915) by Harris & Ewing.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Galite coast

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2016 at 13:27:47 (UTC)

Reason: Is of a high technical standard ... the light is very nice here.
Articles in which this image appears: links to the article(s) that use this image, in order of where the image has highest encyclopedic value
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: IssamBarhoumi

Support as nominator IssamBarhoumi
Comment – If the subject is the gulls, they seem to be backlighted, perhaps by the glare off the water. Sca (talk) 15:08, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close - not in any article. --Janke | Talk 15:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Farida Arriany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2016 at 23:47:35 (UTC)

Reason: Very nice image of the subject. Signed name gives higher EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Farida Arriany +1
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Tati Studio, restored by — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 01:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I wonder why she died at the age of 38, as the article doesn't say that and my quick search failed. Brandmeister^talk 17:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tried searching Tempo's archive; no luck. Kompas may have something, but their archive is offline, and the office is closed for Eid until at least next week. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Spongie555 (talk) 16:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Farida Arriany, c. 1960 (signed).jpg ---The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 01:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

5 support, 0 oppose, consensus reached.. -The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 01:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elsie Leslie by Zaida Ben-Yusuf

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2016 at 01:48:38 (UTC)

Reason: A notable actress photographed by a notable photographer is always a good combination.
Articles in which this image appears: The Rivals, Zaida Ben-Yusuf, Elsie Leslie (in no particular order)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Zaida Ben-Yusuf, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 01:48, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Some motion blur, but given the age, that's fine. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - BarrierBuilder (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strike !vote as user doesn't has the necessary number of edits (100). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Spongie555 (talk) 16:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - Let it go..-The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 01:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Struck !vote cast after the voting period expired. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn't reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Lou Williams

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2016 at 17:02:33 (UTC)

Reason: Great composition and expressions; it's what William P. Gottlieb was known for
Articles in which this image appears: Mary Lou Williams, William P. Gottlieb, et alia
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: William P. Gottlieb, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support either as nominator, slightly prefer original – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↓ – Good capture of an interesting artist, with good detail for 1947. (Taken on 120 film?) Wish that mirror wasn't in the background, but oh well.... Sca (talk) 21:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Adam, how 'bout a top crop that would at least get rid of the guy in the background and the distracting light fixture? Sca (talk) 21:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sca: I didn't want to crop too much, so try this. Tried to just crop out the minimum to avoid distraction at the top, but then a little on the right needed to go. Then it felt too tight, so it went back in. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt. 1 – Exactly what I had in mind (and tried out on my PC). Thanks, Adam. Sca (talk) 00:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt. 1 - Less distracting. Good image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support either – slightly prefer original, it shows more of the room. Bammesk (talk) 02:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC) on the Alt. 1 there is a speck at (x,y)=(1010,200) pixels relative to top left corner, and a very fine line from (104,0) to (70,1180)[reply]
- Not anymore. I went over them again at 200% and removed any speck I could find. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 05:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt1 this is a great portrait - it's well executed and very lively, and has lots of EV. Nick-D (talk) 08:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt. 1 – Jobas (talk) 00:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt. 1 –Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mary Lou Williams (Gottlieb 09231) - Crop.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a clear consensus to promote alt 1. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neptune's Dynamic Environment

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2016 at 16:07:27 (UTC)

Original – Neptune's dynamic environment showing atmosphere details and 5 of the 6 largest moons

Reason: Cool animation showing both details of the atmosphere and 5 of the 6 largest moons
Articles in which this image appears: Moons of Neptune, Neptune
FP category for this image: Space/Looking out
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – Nergaal (talk) 16:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Go..go..go.. -The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomStar81 (Talk) 02:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as the colour filter details don't appear to be explained. It has no audio, so it needs captions explaining them, and they're neither on the file description page nor in articles. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 02:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source. Nergaal (talk) 03:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it's not explained where it's used, nor on the file description page (and given the file description page is relatively hard to get to from a video as Wikipedia's currently set up, it needs to be both). At the moment, if one sees this in an article, they need to watch it, find the somewhat-hidden button to get to the file description, then from there go to the source page. And that's presuming NASA doesn't rearrange their site. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 04:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara McClintock

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2016 at 23:58:57 (UTC)

Reason: Highly notable person, nice shot of her in action, as it were. Restored this mainly at 400%. Added a little headroom; it's kinda just at the requirement, but the film grain indicates that not much, if any, detail is lost because of that.
Articles in which this image appears: Barbara McClintock +10
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: Smithsonian Institution, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very well posed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - high EV, notable person. --Janke | Talk 07:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ditto. Bammesk (talk) 02:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Presumably posed, but it conveys the scientist-at-work theme quite well. Sca (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Rosiestep (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Barbara McClintock (1902-1992) shown in her laboratory in 1947.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Navy Task Force 38

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2016 at 06:19:34 (UTC)

Reason: Impressive picture of the largest single naval formation in history to take part in a battle. There are 11 carriers and 3 battleships, plus some other smaller ships doing a concerted maneuver shortly after Japan's surrender. Not gonna happen again. I think the imperfections are excusable considering the composition and subject matter.
Articles in which this image appears: Fast Carrier Task Force, Japan campaign
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water
Creator: US Navy

Support as nominator – Nergaal (talk) 06:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. In clear need of restoration, white border jutting in at the top left corner. Crop is awfully tight (though this can't be helped much) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – No doubt TF 38 was an impressive formation, but this aerial shot lacks detail and focus, the horizon appears to be tilted – and the war was over when it was taken, so it's not a war-action photo. Sca (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other – Jobas (talk) 00:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Catherine Evans

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2016 at 20:39:00 (UTC)

Reason: A very nice photo - a little luminous, but that's a 1910s photographic convention, I think - either you dump the people deep into shadow, or you make them glow. One of the two. #10wikicommonsdays Day 7
Articles in which this image appears: Alice Catherine Evans
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: National Photo Company, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - Focus seems to be on the equipment behind her. Her hand is really out of focus. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crisco 1492: I'm not sure the focus is that bad; it's a very big scan. Consider this scaled down version - it's still well above the minimum requirements, but everything in the image looks sharp. Perfect focus distance, as would be seen at poster-size, probably was beyond 1910s camera technology, even if this is an incredible image overall. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 04:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Her hand is still out of focus, even scaled down. That's my main problem: her experiment (if that's what it is) is out of focus, and yet it's one of the most important parts of the photograph. The test tubes on the table are pin sharp, and though her face is a bit soft at this resolution I don't mind too much. It's the hand that gives me pause. (If this were a more modern picture, I'd have opposed). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment White highlights and/or brightness could be adjusted here too, something like this. Brandmeister^talk 13:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Brandmeister: Done. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 00:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support Brandmeister^talk 07:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Chris Woodrich – Jobas (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosiestep (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomStar81 (Talk) 21:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Spongie555 (talk) 06:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Alice C. Evans, National Photo Company portrait, circa 1915.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Self-Portrait (Dürer, Madrid)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2016 at 05:29:03 (UTC)

Reason: High Ev as lead image and another amazing quality scan
Articles in which this image appears: Self-Portrait (Dürer, Madrid), List of paintings by Albrecht Dürer, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Albrecht Dürer

Support as nominator – Spongie555 (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – (Not a vote!) – Seems kinda smudgy. Personally I prefer this one, which leads the Dürer article. Sca (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Has great EV as a representation of the painting itself (which has an article). For an image of Durer, I agree that the Munchen self portrait is better. Unfortunately, the only high resolution version of that painting we have is somewhat noisy. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since such large files tend to slow my computer down, I reviewed this at a 3000px wide downsample, and would be happy to promote that, so the full-size passes for me. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 22:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomStar81 (Talk) 20:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Selbstporträt, by Albrecht Dürer, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles IV of Spain and His Family

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2016 at 05:34:11 (UTC)

Reason: High Ev as lead image also good scan of the painting
Articles in which this image appears: Charles IV of Spain and His Family, List of works by Francisco Goya, Realism (arts), etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Francisco Goya

Support as nominator – Spongie555 (talk) 05:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support – Appears to be a good scan by the Prado. Multiple uses on WP. But Charles IV seems a rather enigmatic and not particularly notable historical figure. Sca (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality image. Notable as the painting has an article about it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 02:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support: and I like how less formal it is than many other portraits of the era. Julia\^talk 16:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:La familia de Carlos IV.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern gray squirrel

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2016 at 00:31:07 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image, good EV. Featured on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Eastern gray squirrel +2
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Tomfriedel

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Excellent detail. Sca (talk) 13:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per above, exemplary photo for a squirrel. Brandmeister^talk 14:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. gazhiley 09:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Eastern Grey Squirrel.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brigid Balfour

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2016 at 18:16:01 (UTC)

Reason: A fine image of a notable scientist, who made at least one discovery that's part of basic immunology now. #10wikicommonsdays Day 10, Pt 1
Articles in which this image appears: Brigid Balfour
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: MRC National Institute for Medical Research; Restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Curious about the grain, however. Any guesses as to what kind of film was used? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A fast film of some kind? Sca (talk) 21:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Jobas (talk) 12:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I find the background to be a bit too close to her skin tone. Nergaal (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, but as she did in the 90s, there's not much we can do. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 04:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support: from me too. Julia\^talk 16:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Brigid M. Balfour (1914-1994) - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Greider

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2016 at 16:43:03 (UTC)

Reason: A fine photo of a Nobel Laureate; just quirky enough of a pose to not look terribly staged, and very sharp and high quality.
Articles in which this image appears: Carol W. Greider
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: Keith Weller

Support either as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 16:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice. Worth getting rid of the vignetting? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crisco 1492: It's very typical of the time, although it'd also be pretty easy to remove, as it's just two corners away from her. I'll remove it if consensus is to remove it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 14:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Crisco 1492: I tried reducing the vignetting, in case it's wanted: File:GREIDER Carol 2014 - Less vignetting.jpg Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 04:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'd support that one. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Okay; Uploaded as alt. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 08:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT only – Jobas (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Rosiestep (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support ALT --Rosiestep (talk) 13:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support ALT only — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support either – I kind of prefer the first image, the one with the vignetting, not because of the vignetting per se but for two different reasons: 1) I think with the vignetting, the eye is drawn more to her face and expression, and 2) for color balance. The black at the edges, especially the upper edges, picks up the black in her dress (that appears beneath her sweater). Without the vignetting, the background is nearly the same color as her outfit. However, I'm no expert in photography, so I defer to the image experts here. – Corinne (talk) 00:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt per Crisco..-The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 01:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:GREIDER Carol 2014 - Less vignetting.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a clear consensus that alt 1 should be promoted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Kranz in Mission Control

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2016 at 04:34:38 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image, especially considering it is from 1965. Historic photo of Gene Kranz working as flight director in flight control in his signature vest. Free license as it is from NASA. This is one of the most historic photos from NASA's mission control.
Articles in which this image appears: Gene Kranz
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
Creator: Johnson Space Center

Support ALT1 as nominator – Kees08 (talk) 04:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT1 - Useful, good for showing him in a workplace setting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - My only issue is that this isn't his signature vest - the article notes that his signature was a white vest, but the article has no photos of him wearing one, and two (including this) of him in dark vests. TSP (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, fair enough. He wore the black vests during training sessions. His wife made him different vests for different occasions, and sometimes special ones for unique events. I think the vest itself is the important bit, I can change up my wording. Kees08 (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Actually, I think you're right and the article is wrong - http://spacecenter.org/attractions/starship-gallery/gene-kranz-vest/ shows that his Apollo 17 vest was striped (admittedly with one of the colours being white), and http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4223/ch6.htm has him in a dark vest during the Gemini VIII re-entry. I think the 'signature' white vest was simply the one he was wearing at his most famous moment - during the Apollo 13 mission. So I think the image is fine and the article needs correcting. TSP (talk) 17:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kees08, Jobas, Crisco 1492, and TSP: I've added a cleanup. Mainly because of the bottom and left edges, and the fingerprint in the lower right corner, though I removed dust specks from throughout the image. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 – Jobas (talk) 22:57, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1: Dynamic and interesting. Thanks for cleaning it up, Adam! Julia\^talk 16:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Eugene F. Kranz at his console at the NASA Mission Control Center.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Game Gear

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2016 at 00:34:19 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image of this handheld system.
Articles in which this image appears: Game Gear +4
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Electronics
Creator: Evan Amos

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, as is expected from Evan Amos. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 02:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, had Sega Megadrive, but didn't know about this in my childhood. Brandmeister^talk 20:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Let it be...-The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 14:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - as per nom. Mattximus (talk) 23:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Game-Gear-Handheld.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalind Venetia Pitt-Rivers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2016 at 07:13:12 (UTC)

Reason: A fine image of a notable person. We should be glad for such image releases. Interesting life story and important discoveries.
Articles in which this image appears: Rosalind Venetia Pitt-Rivers
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and Engineering
Creator: MRC National Institute for Medical Research; Restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 07:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support but the date field needs to be fixed. There's no way that this image was taken in 2013. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- ...Ugh. UploadWizard strikes again. Fixed, since it was in the description, at least, presuming it was taken while she was there. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 07:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. We need to feature more good photographs of notable women.--Ipigott (talk) 10:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ipigott, and it's a great image. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support- Per nom, nice picture. Mattximus (talk) 22:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Niven

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2016 at 21:39:11 (UTC)

Reason: The third in a set of notable British scientists, and a fine image. Actually looks shockingly like a friend of mine.
Articles in which this image appears: Janet Niven
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: MRC National Institute for Medical Research, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose - Very awkward pose, almost looks afraid of the camera. --Janke | Talk 14:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ —Constanstin 06:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strike !vote as this account isn't old enough for that (was registered only 9 days ago instead of the required 25). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose per Janke. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Janke and Crisco 1492: ...I don't get your votes at all. I have a friend who looks shockingly like her, and that looks to me like a perfectly relaxed, natural pose, as I often see on my friend. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - For me, it's because she is looking one way while her body and head are turned another way. That and the fact that she may be squinting (can't find any other images of her for me to compare with). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ MITB --- MITB_talk 09:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck as user isn't eligible to !vote. (was registered only 2 days ago instead of the required 25) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aminah Cendrakasih

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2016 at 01:47:57 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image of the actress during the early period of her career. Was used on the cover of the 29 April 1959 edition of Varia. We also have an image of this session, which is interesting.
Articles in which this image appears: Aminah Cendrakasih
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Tati Studios, restoration by — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 13:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ive marked a single splodge on the Commons markup thing, but it's minor. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support, quite pretty. Brandmeister^talk 10:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can someone make the background clean? Old photos can't be allowed to bypass featured picture criteria. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 12:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- As is clear in the original source file, the background was not entirely plain. There was some texture. Removing what texture remains would misrepresent the subject. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per nom, the number of red links on her page is an indication of how little info we have on Indonesian cinema. Mattximus (talk) 22:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Aminah Cendrakasih, c. 1959, by Tati Photo Studio.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Early-2010s infantry equipment of the British Army (photo set)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2016 at 20:54:33 (UTC)

A British Army infantryman showing full combat dress and standard personal kit (front and back views)

Reason: Highly encyclopedic photos, especially with the information on the file pages.
Articles in which this image appears: Modern equipment of the British Army#Personal equipment, Royal Highland Fusiliers, MultiCam
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Others
Creator: Sgt Rupert Frere RLC / Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom)

Support as nominator – Pine^✉ 20:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 21:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Would work better if images were of the same size. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll support if presentation is cleaned up. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- A typical Pine nomination ;-)..-The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 01:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though you may want to tweak the presentation a bit. The differing heights are awkward, and the front and back views, presumably to stop him shooting at himself, are reversed. A vertical presentation would be more natural, most likely. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 02:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomStar81 (Talk) 05:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Typical stock military PR. Minimal EV. Zero human interest. Sca (talk) 00:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Chris' comments that it would be better if these images were a bit more alike, but they were well executed and have strong EV. I'm a bit mystified by Sca's comment: soldiers are required to wear standard uniforms and use standard sets of equipment equipment, and images clearly showing the full kit of a combat soldier have significant historic value. The Australian War Memorial, for instance, goes out of its way to ensure that it has photos and examples of full combat gear in its collection and these are predominantly displayed in a museum which is visited by hundreds of thousands of people per year. Nick-D (talk) 08:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We all know soldiers are required to wear uniforms. The point is, these are public-relations photos, not any sort of real-world event. Sca (talk) 13:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And you can identify every piece of kit worn by a British soldier in the 2010s without even looking at a photograph? Good on you! But for the rest of us, these posed shots show the uniform much better than a shot of a soldier (say) caught in a firefight.Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I find them boring. I don't think most readers are interested in every piece of kit worn by British soldiers in the 2010s. Nor do most of us expect to be required to identify them anytime soon. Sca (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I find several subjects presented in these fora to be boring, but nonetheless I am able to push my own biases aside to recognize the value of various contributions. Wikipedia and its processes are bigger than any one editor, and as such we are supposed to focus on content quality in featured processes, rather than some abstract ideal of 'not boring to me'. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 02:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I find many of the featured artworks boring. Shall we delist those? 86.185.218.109 (talk) 03:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - But I agree with Adam and Chris. Spongie555 (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sca. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:British Army Soldier in Full Kit in Afghanistan MOD 45152581.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:British Army Soldier in Full Kit in Afghanistan MOD 45152579.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added images to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military instead. --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gertrude Käsebier

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2016 at 00:38:31 (UTC)

Reason: Somewhat grainy, but that's fairly excusable - photography around 1900 is prone to that. Still, this IS a good image. The pose is very natural, and there's a reasonable amount of detail; her face is well represented. Plus the photographer is notable. Colour is reasonably accurate - the TIFF has colour bars, though I did darken up the blacks a little, to correct for fading.
Articles in which this image appears: Gertrude Käsebier, Adolph de Meyer
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Adolph de Meyer, restored by User:Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 00:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Interesting article & gallery. Sca (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please try to improve the quality. Though taken during bygone days of unrefined photography, we shouldn't show leniency. As this picture was improved, this can also be cleared. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 12:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rainbow Archer: I'm not sure you quite get hat's possible and impossible. The scratches and such have been fixed on this image, and the contrast upped. There's not much more that can be done; the remaining problems are graininess. Going back to the original negatives might help a bit, but Adolph de Meyer's original negatives are almost entirely lost, so that's probably not possible. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 16:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are other problems also. As she is wearing hat, the shadow is covering her face's upper part. Her forehead is not visible and she is the subject here. Rainbow Archer (talk) 16:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While true, clothing does tell us something about her - her dramatic taste in clothing contrasts nicely with her calm facial expression. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 16:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ MITB --- MITB_talk 09:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck as user isn't eligible to !vote. (was registered only 2 days ago instead of the required 25) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Jobas (talk) 10:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Spongie555 (talk) 04:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gertrude Käsebier by Adolf de Meyer.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Philip V of Spain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2016 at 03:37:36 (UTC)

Reason: High ev as lead image and good scan of the painting
Articles in which this image appears: Philip V of Spain, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: Jean Ranc

Support as nominator – Spongie555 (talk) 03:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Numerous watermarks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Chris. Good painting, but the watermarks ruin the reproduction. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Watermarks all over. Mattximus (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Chris – Jobas (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinand VII of Spain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2016 at 03:50:17 (UTC)

Reason: High ev as lead image and good scan of the painting
Articles in which this image appears: Ferdinand VII of Spain, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: Francisco Goya

Support as nominator – Spongie555 (talk) 03:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ MITB --- MITB_talk 09:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck as user isn't eligible to !vote. (was registered only 2 days ago instead of the required 25) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Jobas (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn't reached the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kill Count

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2016 at 04:46:23 (UTC)

Reason: For most aircraft in service with their parent nation it is customary for the unit to denote the number of kills that the aircraft and pilot have racked up over the course of the plane's career. Here, the nose of an A-10A Thunderbolt II close air support aircraft shows off the stars painted on the aircraft to denote the number of Iraqi trucks, artillery pieces, tanks, armored vehicles and radar sites destroyed by the aircraft during the 1991 Gulf War.
Articles in which this image appears: Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
FP category for this image: War
Creator: Don S. Montgomery, USN (Ret.) (PD-USGov)

Support as nominator – TomStar81 (Talk) 04:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see any EV. It's not a good depiction of the A-10A Thunderbolt, and there is no mention of "kill counts" in the article, and there is no specific article for it. Interesting pic, but I'm not seeing how it links to the encyclopedia. Mattximus (talk) 23:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-Sorry but no EV here...-The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 11:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Viewers need to watch keenly to know the subject of this picture. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 12:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cynthia "Sippy" Woodhead

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2016 at 05:30:22 (UTC)

Reason: While grainy, this is a fantastic candid shot. Check out the water drops in her hair, and the emotion of her expression.
Articles in which this image appears: Cynthia Woodhead
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport
Creator: Koen Suyk / Anefo; Restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 05:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Considering the speed of film needed for athletic meets, I don't mind the grain here. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Right side of her head (left side of pic) is rather badly shadowed.

Understand re fast film & athletics, but this print is awfully grainy. Looks like it was taken on ASA 1000 film – too bad photog didn't switch to Tri-X for this shot. Sca (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sca: If you'll look at the original, you'll see I've brought up the shadows a bit. You'll note her hair is at least somewhat distinct from the background here; that isn't true of the original. I'm not sure how much more I can do about the dark part of the photo. I think it's definitely an improvement, though. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I could go a little further. Updating... Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 16:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and Chris has been notified the nomination has changed. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 16:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ support – This does look better – and it's a nice capture of a moment. Sca (talk) 18:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Her hair got mixed up with the black background. Rainbow Archer (talk) 16:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Rainbow Archer: I know. A good portion of my work on this was bringing it away from the background as much as possible without being misleading. I think I've done as much as I could in that line. If you didn't know, I always upload the originals. This is the pre-restoration image. I think you'll agree I've pulled out a lot of shadow detail. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect technically, but the excellent composition and strong EV of the moment the photo captures more than makes up for this. Nick-D (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ In my opinion, It's good enough.MITB --- MITB_talk 09:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck as user isn't eligible to !vote. (was registered only 2 days ago instead of the required 25) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Good EV, nice candid shot (and we don't get too many photographs from this era). Kaldari (talk) 03:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 10:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cynthia Woodhead 1980 - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winston Churchill

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2016 at 09:48:11 (UTC)

.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MacIsTheBest (talk • contribs) 05:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A picture of an important and historical leader.
Articles in which this image appears: United Kingdom, Winston Churchill
FP category for this image: category:Winston Churchill
Creator: Hohum created the latest version.

Support as nominator – MITB --- MITB_talk 19:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - there must be better quality shots of this very notable person. --Janke | Talk 19:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will search a better one.MITB --- MITB_talk 19:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ MITB: Please familiarize yourself with the FP criteria before nominating ineligible pictures (e.g. too small), thanks! --Janke | Talk 08:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't noticed that.MITB --- MITB_talk 19:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest a third alternative? I want to suggest [this picture]. It's suitable according to the FP criteria.MITB --- MITB_talk 07:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest closure None of the images here meet the featured picture criteria, and it appears that the nomination is something of a fishing expedition. MITB, it would be good to have a FP of Churchill (or more if we already have some), but please take the time to consider the criteria and the quality of the image. Nick-D (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will. Sorry for nominating unsuitable pictures.MITB --- MITB_talk 14:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted ---The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close per above. Below FP standards. Better luck next time MITB, Happy editing.. -The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rory Kennedy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2016 at 23:15:17 (UTC)

Reason: A bit stylised, and black-and-white as an artistic choice, but the choices work well. I've levels adjusted this a little bit since it did seem a bit too dark and shadowed, but it's otherwise untweaked
Articles in which this image appears: Rory Kennedy
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Lyndie Benson

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great pose. Damn shame the photographer focused on her neck rather than her face (facial features are unsharp, necklace is sharp). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crisco 1492: Come to think of it, isn't that actually one of those things photographers do intentionally? Blur the face slightly to give smoother-looking skin? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 14:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Some. But there are much better alternatives than missing the focus. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't think any photographer does it by missing the focus (it makes the image look odd / out of focus). It is done by putting a filter in front of the lens, or using a special purpose lens, or these days in software. Bammesk (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Good EV. Striking resemblance to her father, esp. around the eyes. Agree re focus, but overall detail is acceptable. Sca (talk) 14:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. @Sca:, I thought you were against politicians and their family...;-)..-The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 11:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Au contraire, I absolutely love politicians, all of them! – as long as they're not trying to slip official pics of themselves into the media as clandestine political advertising. Sca (talk) 14:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Jobas (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per Sca Spongie555 (talk) 00:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – out of focus, not FP quality for a 2011 photograph. The camera-composition-lighting show this is a professional studio photo. The focus is on the far side of her head and farther back, not her face. I would be sympathetic if it was a historic photo or an action shot, but it is neither. Bammesk (talk) 02:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rory Kennedy 2011.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bertha Lutz

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2016 at 03:52:50 (UTC)

Reason: A fine photograph of a notable Brazilian scientist, which is probably an underrepresented subject. Pose isn't perfect, but isn't bad.
Articles in which this image appears: Bertha Lutz
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: National Photo Company; restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 03:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is good for 1925. Pose is acceptable (heck, I thought this was in the 1950s at first glance) - — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per Crisco. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 10:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Good detail for the era. Rather artful composition. Sca (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 10:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Bertha Lutz 1925.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Johnson

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2016 at 11:41:57 (UTC)

Reason

Math - Computers + Katherine Johnson = Man in Space.
Math + Computers + Katherine Johnson = Man on Moon.
Men in Space + Disaster + Katherine Johnson = Men safely on Earth.

Also, it's a nice action shot. OF MATH!

Articles in which this image appears: Katherine Johnson
FP category for this image: She's a mathematician, but she was applying that math to physics, so I think Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering makes sense.
Creator: NASA, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 11:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, she's worth another support. --Janke | Talk 14:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – 3 pencils + 1 calculator = minimalist. Bammesk (talk) 16:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Yeah, I think this picture worths it.MITB --- MITB_talk 09:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck as user isn't eligible to !vote. (was registered only 2 days ago instead of the required 25) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Jobas (talk) 10:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I feel that the picture needs to be cropped, so that the focus is on her. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 11:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I think pictures of people at their job add a lot of value that cropping tends to remove. If we crop it to her, it would tend to de-emphasise that she was a NASA mathematician. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 11:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Katherine Johnson at NASA, in 1966.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]