Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mykungfu (4th)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Mykungfu

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Mykungfu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Report submission by

Robotam 16:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Continuation of persistent sockpuppet Mykungfu, aka NinjaNubian, via anon IPs after permanent ban of his major accounts.[1][2][3][4][5][6] User continues to edit via anon IPs, picking up the edits and arguments of User:Mykungfu,inserting/reinserting the same links as Mykungfu (see [7] vs. [8]) and and demonstrating incivility towards the same editors as Mykungfu[9][10][11]. Editor continues to vandalize and stalk templates, members, and entries related to certain African-American fraternities and sororities, such as placing delete templates on sites related to Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity[12] and inserting "grants honorary membership to men" in Delta Sigma Theta Sorority.[13] Usage of multiple usernames and anon IPs is modus of this blocked editor who has vowed that "this will go on forever"[14] if he/she is not allowed to have his/her way. All of the above IPs and usernames were created during periods or immediately after periods where socks of Mykungfu were blocked, or administrators declined to unblock said sockpuppets.

Comments

I've indef-blocked Redstormman as a very obvious sock, based on contribs. | Mr. Darcy talk 15:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I received information about this on my talk page. I'm not to sure about why i'm listed as a sockpuppet. My entry for "grants honorary membership to men" in the sorority was actually a direct copy and paste from "11:23, 18 January 2007 (hist) (diff) m Omega Psi Phi " this article and was placed in 14:01, 23 January 2007 (hist) (diff) Delta Sigma Theta . I changed a few things on my initial copy and paste, but it wasn't perfect (i forgot to change men to women). For this i'm listed as a sockpuppet? thanks for reading. AfricanAmericanHistorian 21:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's one example, MKF. Your citation to the same group of self published blogs, google searches etc. tend to be a giveaway as well, among others; there is also your MO of attempting to enlist "help" under false pretenses once you get caught.-Robotam 21:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's the only example that I am listed under. I don't know about anything else or anyone else. I thought google was a good technique to use. I dont see what's wrong with [15] , [16] , [17] , or my other edits. what have i been caught doing? adding links and information? I dont know what the huge issue you have with this individual, but I am not s/he. I'd appreciate it if I was removed from this. thanks. AfricanAmericanHistorian 21:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speaking of which, other common MOs of Mykungfu are Wikilawyering(see above), as well as using support socks to bolster a position or give the impression of support.[18][19]The suspected socks were all used in editing Sigma Pi Phi in this manner,[20] and in another instance, the IP comment appears to actually be signed "mykungfu[21]." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Robotam (talk • contribs) 03:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC).

- I took a look at MrDouglass and I don't see any Sigma Pi Phi editorials

[22] I took a look at kkmayes and only see one contribution there and it wasn't to Sigma Pi Phi [23] I took a look at Redstormman and there were 2 contribution to Sigma Pi Phi [24] I have one contribution and that was to fix a heading [25] It is also very unusual to me that 172.193.231.127 [26] would answer a question that was posted by Vmhayes on his user page as well as on the AKA talk page if it were to himself. [27] It is even stranger that 172.164.250.29 would give a warning to MrDouglass on user talk:MrDouglass [28] I also was given a warning by 172,164.250.29 on my talk page. This is how I found out about this [29]. All in all, I don't belong in this sockpuppet case. The quicker this is resolved the quicker I can have the message taken off my userpage. AfricanAmericanHistorian 06:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mykungfu, User:AfricanAmericanHistorian and User:MrDouglass have been blocked as definite socks of Mykungfu. | Mr. Darcy talk 15:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redstormman was also blocked by Mr. Darcy. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All but one named account has been indef blocked; see [30]. Closing. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]