Post

NUCLEAR, RENEWABLE ENERGY

Posted to WOGNEWS
image credit: NUCLEAR, RENEWABLE ENERGY
Vladimir Vinogradov's picture
Owner, CEO, WOGNEWS

I'm an owner of my website http://wognews.net/  -  Global Energy Market Climate Changes News - publicly available information portal about the global energy market and climate changes. There are...

  • Member since 2019
  • 412 items added with 247,271 views
  • Sep 19, 2019
  • 2870 views

WNN wrote.

Nuclear and renewable generation should be used in combination to make the most of their synergies in integrated systems to help the world meet carbon reduction goals and limit temperature rise, leaders from governmental and non-governmental organisations and industry said yesterday. Innovative nuclear technologies will play their part in integrated systems alongside renewables, with combined uses of heat and power, hydrogen production, desalination and industrial decarbonisation.

Nuclear Energy in Clean Energy Solutions - Telling our Story was hosted by NICE Future at the 63rd IAEA General Conference in Vienna yesterday. The initiative - the name stands for Nuclear Innovation: Clean Energy Future - was launched in May 2018 at the 9th Clean Energy Ministerial in Denmark with the aim of ensuring nuclear energy is included in the forum's discussions about innovation and advanced clean energy systems of the future. The initiative, now in its second year, will encourage a vision for new, clean and reliable energy solutions for the near and long term.

The Flexible Nuclear Campaign, which has now been launched as part of the NICE Future initiative, aims to share experiences, provide role models and communicate the performance requirements for integrated systems of nuclear alongside renewables, session chair and US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Senior Advisor Suzie Jaworowski said.

Leaders from government and multigovernmental organisations discussed the role of nuclear in national strategic energy planning. Moderator Kamal Araj, vice chairman and commissioner for nuclear power reactors at the Jordan Atomic Energy Commission, said the synergy between renewables and nuclear could open opportunities for regional cross-sectoral integration. Speakers Jay Khosla, assistant deputy minister at Natural Resources Canada, IAEA Deputy Director General Mikhail Chudakov, UK Ambassador to the IAEA David Hall and Collins Juma, CEO of the Kenya Nuclear Elecricity Board, talked of the recognition now being given to nuclear's essential role in achieving carbon reduction goals and limiting temperature rise.

They also discussed the role that small modular reactors (SMRs) in particular could potentially play in integrated systems that also make full use of the technology's attributes for non-electricity generation applications, such as desalination, hydrogen generation, and the decarbonisation of industrial processes.

The issue of grid stabilisation in industrialising nations moving towards a high share of renewables must also be remembered, Juma said. A high renewable share - in some cases over 50% - would make a small grid very vulnerable, he said. "We've been bogged down with the discussion of renewables versus nuclear," he said, adding that many policymakers "drew a line" between renewables and nuclear and renewables. Effort was needed to underline to those policymakers the synergy between the two, he said.

Conversation leads to action

Carol Berrigan, senior director of the Nuclear Energy Institute, asked a panel of leaders from NGOs and business for their views on tensions between renewables and nuclear and the move from an "or" to an "and" situation.

World Nuclear Association Director General Agneta Rising said the conversation is moving rapidly, especially in expert areas and international organisations. "What we now see is that nuclear is included in most solutions - and actions are being taken," she said. Nuclear had been more prominent than ever before in discussions at the World Energy Congress held in Abu Dhabi only the week before the IAEA General Conference, she noted.

Speaking to World Nuclear News after the side event, Rising highlighted the need for the nuclear industry to work closely with the bodies developing pathways for sustainable development. The Association, for example, provides support to emerging and expanding nuclear countries particularly through its Spotlight conferences.

"Over the past few months, several of the world's most recognised experts and organisations have highlighted not only the crucial contribution that existing nuclear power plants make towards climate change, but also the need for nuclear energy to grow - be it the IAEA, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency," she said. "We are confident that policymakers will reflect on these landmark reports and their conclusions, take these messages back home and put in place the right policies, a task which the world nuclear industry is ready to support to the fullest to reach the Harmony goal of 25% of electricity provided by nuclear by 2050."

Nuclear power directly contributes to United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 7 (affordable and clean energy) and 13 (climate action), Rising noted. "Nuclear energy, complemented by other low carbon sources, must play a central role if we want to shift to a clean, affordable and reliable energy system," she said. "Beyond energy and climate action, the use of nuclear energy and technologies contributes to the majority of the development goals. It can be used for desalination, ensuring a fresh supply of drinking water, while its small environmental footprint leaves more space for nature to thrive. Its use prevents many thousands of air pollution deaths per year by displacing fossil fuelled power stations, and radionuclides produced in reactors are used to treat illnesses and prevent food-borne diseases and food spoilage."

WOGNEWS
WOGNEWS, Global Energy Market News is a publicly available information portal about the global energy market and industry. The portal contains information in text, video and photo formats since January, 2014.
RECENT POSTS FROM THIS COMPANY
Discussions
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Sep 19, 2019

"Over the past few months, several of the world's most recognised experts and organisations have highlighted not only the crucial contribution that existing nuclear power plants make towards climate change, but also the need for nuclear energy to grow - be it the IAEA, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency," she said. "We are confident that policymakers will reflect on these landmark reports and their conclusions, take these messages back home and put in place the right policies, a task which the world nuclear industry is ready to support to the fullest to reach the Harmony goal of 25% of electricity provided by nuclear by 2050."

This type of collaboration and positivity, unity, is great to see. There are enough external hurdles in the way, we shouldn't be adding more by in-fighting about which type of clean energy is best when the solution can be a wide and varied tool chest. 

Vladimir Vinogradov's picture
Vladimir Vinogradov on Sep 20, 2019

Matt, I agree with you.

Bob Wallace's picture
Bob Wallace on Sep 20, 2019

Matt, the article is about a bunch of people who make their livings from the nuclear industry getting together and telling each other that nuclear has a meaningful role to play.

Countries that supply the world with oil could have a meeting and tell themselves that EVs won't kill their business.  That, obviously, would not make it true.  Look to see if you can find any logic that leads to 25% of the world's electricity needing to be produced by nuclear.  This was a meeting of nuclear's "Baghdad Bobs".

Bob Wallace's picture
Bob Wallace on Sep 20, 2019

Vladimir, I'd like to see your thinking about the ecomomics of a RE grid vs. a RE + nuclear grid.  I'm going to give you two formulas, let you fill in the percentages for a nuclear/RE grid.

Let's use Lazard's 2017 costs for nuclear, wind, and solar even though we know wind and solar have become considerably less expensive since that publication of (probably 2016) data.

Nuclear $0.148/kWh.  Wind $0.045/kWh.  Solar $0.05/kWh.  I assume it's OK to round to $0.15 for nuclear and $0.05 for wind/solar.

The cost of storage is hard to estimate at this point in time.  How about we use Secretary Chu's estimate of $0.10/kWh for new pump-up hydro storage.

We should be able to get at least 35% of our electricity directly from wind turbines and at least 35% of our electricity directly from solar panels, leaving 30% which would need to be stored wind/solar at $0.15/kWh.

70% at 5 cents plus 30% at 15c = 8c/kWh for a RE grid.

Now you fill in the percentages for a RE/nuclear grid -

X1% solar at 5c + X2% wind at 5c + X3% nuclear at 15c + X4% storage at 20c =

I used 20 cents for storage based on half of what would be stored coming from wind/solar at 5c and half from nuclear at 15c.  Average 10c + 10c for storage.  Feel free to present an argument for a different mix.

Can you identify a set of values that would make a mixed RE/nuclear grid competitive with a RE grid?

 

 

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Sep 20, 2019

We should be able to get at least 35% of our electricity directly from wind turbines and at least 35% of our electricity directly from solar panels, leaving 30% which would need to be stored wind/solar at $0.15/kWh.

Are you saying that 70% of the daily needs would be met with solar and wind before any storage takes place? Certainly we can get that high when storage is accounted for, but how do you get to the conclusion that 70% is possible without factoring in storage?

Bob Wallace's picture
Bob Wallace on Sep 20, 2019

Synergy - the interaction or cooperation of two or more organizations, substances, or other agents to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects.

I see nothing in the post that describes any synergy between nuclear and RE. 

Wind turbines don't make more electricity if there's a nuclear reactor on the grid and reactors don't make more electricity if there are solar panels on the grid.  Wind, solar, and nuclear do not assist each other.

I can't see how, and the post does not describe, how nuclear, wind, and solar would somehow combine their outputs to create a better (more reliable?  cheaper?) grid. 

What would happen is that nuclear would simply supply a fixed amount of demand since it is economically disasterous to use nuclear as a dispatchable power source.  That would leave wind and solar with the task of supplying the rest of demand, the variable part.  Nuclear and wind/solar wouldn't be working together.  Nuclear would be providing part of the supply.  At an inflated cost.

 

Vladimir Vinogradov's picture
Thank Vladimir for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »