- Jung, Audrey Y;
- Ahearn, Thomas U;
- Behrens, Sabine;
- Middha, Pooja;
- Bolla, Manjeet K;
- Wang, Qin;
- Arndt, Volker;
- Aronson, Kristan J;
- Augustinsson, Annelie;
- Freeman, Laura E Beane;
- Becher, Heiko;
- Brenner, Hermann;
- Canzian, Federico;
- Carey, Lisa A;
- Consortium, CTS;
- Czene, Kamila;
- Eliassen, A Heather;
- Eriksson, Mikael;
- Evans, D Gareth;
- Figueroa, Jonine D;
- Fritschi, Lin;
- Gabrielson, Marike;
- Giles, Graham G;
- Guénel, Pascal;
- Hadjisavvas, Andreas;
- Haiman, Christopher A;
- Håkansson, Niclas;
- Hall, Per;
- Hamann, Ute;
- Hoppe, Reiner;
- Hopper, John L;
- Howell, Anthony;
- Hunter, David J;
- Hüsing, Anika;
- Kaaks, Rudolf;
- Kosma, Veli-Matti;
- Koutros, Stella;
- Kraft, Peter;
- Lacey, James V;
- Le Marchand, Loic;
- Lissowska, Jolanta;
- Loizidou, Maria A;
- Mannermaa, Arto;
- Maurer, Tabea;
- Murphy, Rachel A;
- Olshan, Andrew F;
- Olsson, Håkan;
- Patel, Alpa V;
- Perou, Charles M;
- Rennert, Gad;
- Shibli, Rana;
- Shu, Xiao-Ou;
- Southey, Melissa C;
- Stone, Jennifer;
- Tamimi, Rulla M;
- Teras, Lauren R;
- Troester, Melissa A;
- Truong, Thérèse;
- Vachon, Celine M;
- Wang, Sophia S;
- Wolk, Alicja;
- Wu, Anna H;
- Yang, Xiaohong R;
- Zheng, Wei;
- Dunning, Alison M;
- Pharoah, Paul DP;
- Easton, Douglas F;
- Milne, Roger L;
- Chatterjee, Nilanjan;
- Schmidt, Marjanka K;
- García-Closas, Montserrat;
- Chang-Claude, Jenny
Background
Reproductive factors have been shown to be differentially associated with risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer. However, their associations with intrinsic-like subtypes are less clear.Methods
Analyses included up to 23 353 cases and 71 072 controls pooled from 31 population-based case-control or cohort studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium across 16 countries on 4 continents. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the association between reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic-like subtypes (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, HER2-enriched-like, and triple-negative breast cancer) and by invasiveness. All statistical tests were 2-sided.Results
Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had a lower risk of luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, and HER2-enriched-like disease. This association was apparent only after approximately 10 years since last birth and became stronger with increasing time (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.71; and OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.46 for multiparous women with luminal A-like tumors 20 to less than 25 years after last birth and 45 to less than 50 years after last birth, respectively). In contrast, parous women had a higher risk of triple-negative breast cancer right after their last birth (for multiparous women: OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.02 to 4.83) that was attenuated with time but persisted for decades (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.34, for multiparous women 25 to less than 30 years after last birth). Older age at first birth (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) and breastfeeding (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) were associated with lower risk of triple-negative breast cancer but not with other disease subtypes. Younger age at menarche was associated with higher risk of all subtypes; older age at menopause was associated with higher risk of luminal A-like but not triple-negative breast cancer. Associations for in situ tumors were similar to luminal A-like.Conclusions
This large and comprehensive study demonstrates a distinct reproductive risk factor profile for triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes, with implications for the understanding of disease etiology and risk prediction.