Saying that a certain group of people is too privileged to complain about the way that things are is its own sort of defense of the status quo
Like if a white person from the American suburbs who had doctors for parents says “the suburbs are set up in a way that’s designed to alienate the people within them from their neighbors growing up there can be an incredibly lonely isolating experience” and you respond with “shut up you had everything you ever wanted growing up” you are sort of pretending that this asocial way of living we’ve set up based on harmful ideas like castle doctrine and individualism is in some way desirable for someone when the reality of the situation is that everyone is miserable.
Oh boy this is popping off. But I just want to put on this post that this isn’t just about the example that I used this is also when people get mad at you for complaining about aspects of living in America because other people are getting bombed by America how dare you, or when (usually neurodivergent) white people complain about how wasp monoculture is high key hostile to be raised in, or when people with middle class jobs complain about the shit their boss pulls, or any other number of situations in which a relatively privileged potential ally talks about the unique ways the oppressive systems we’re looking to overthrow effects them negatively. Like yes sure if you have a minimum wage job it’s annoying to listen to someone with a salary and benefits say “my boss treats me like shit and my company is doing x evil thing” but if you’re in that situation and you’re actually down for the cause instead of just here to play oppression Olympics, you want to gain allies in this fight by saying “have you considered unionizing” instead of pushing people away by saying “shut up at least you can afford rent”
I watched TRON (1982) and TRON LEGACY (2010) back to back and I want to tell you what makes a TRON plot:
A counter-culture hacker has a strained relationship with the ENCOM tech company. They sit at a desk (with their back to a big laser) to poke around a computer system, then get lasered into cyberspace by a rogue intelligent program that has taken charge of its program society through militaristic cyberviolence. The hacker is briefly forced to play deathsports (video games) before fleeing into a cyberworld they don’t understand, joining forces with anti-fascist cyberallies while constantly on the run, trying to get to a big glowing cyberbeam in order to get home and also defeat the rogue ai’s cyberplan to spread its cybercontrol to human society. There’s a cyberguy named Tron who -and this is essential- is only important to the plot once. Profit-driven tech leaders get deposed. The visuals are state-of-the-art and indulgently weird, often beautiful but also confidently overreaching their capabilities. Philosophical questions of life and meaning are raised but never explicitly explored in dialogue, though messages are ripe for extrapolating. Jeff Bridges is there and he’s a pretty chill cybergod.
They should make a new one every 15 years or so forever.
If you had shown me this site in 2005 I would have asked you if had checked your virus software lately, because this looks like a bad one. I would have clicked away so fast it would give you whiplash. Looking at these sites now, I have to convince myself that they aren’t virus laden sites and fight against the pavlovian urge to just navigate away.
I navigate away anyways because fuck them, there’s usually a better site (though they are dwindling quickly). I still can’t get over how the internet “as intended” today looks like a malware ridden fever dream from 20 years ago. This is every story I’ve ever read about an empire that used to be great and has now fallen into turmoil.
Beloveds, there is a wonderful website that gets rid of all that crap<3
character misses their shot and the villain goes “ha! you missed.” and the main character goes “did i?” and then shoots the villain again while they’re frantically looking around the room for what the hero could possibly have aiming for instead
The MCU’s Spiderman is not a poor execution of Peter Parker’s character concept. He’s not even poor execution of Miles Morales’s character concept.
He is a poor execution of Terry McGinnis’s character concept.
Peter Parker and Miles Morales both have so many fundamental pieces to their characters that are just missing for the MCU’s Spiderman. Familiar names are floating around him- Aunt May, Mary Jane, Ganke Lee- but the fundamental ideas that make up Peter or Miles arcs just are not there. Themes like Miles’s family expectations, Peter’s constant money struggles, and the balancing act of doing good vs trying to live your own life are all absent. Even the idea of power and responsibility isn’t properly introduced until the THIRD MOVIE when that really should been the central theme from the beginning.
Rather the MCU Spiderman has way more parallels with Terry McGinnis. Both are young hot shot teenagers who end up being taken under the wing of established and experienced hero who is on their way out. Both have complex relationships with their mentor which in a lot of ways serves as the driving force of their character arcs. Both gain high tech suits which enable their heroism. Both are viewed (or at least supposed to be viewed in MCU Peter’s case) as heirs to the legacy of this hero.
It falls apart when you get into how they are different. While Uncle Ben is implied to have existed and be dead by the time MCU Peter is introduced in Civil War it’s never actually confirmed and never properly comes up. Meanwhile the death of Terry’s father is essentially the inciting incident of Batman Beyond: it’s what motivates and drives Terry and the murder and it’s fallout are the main focus of the first two episodes of Batman Beyond.
What’s more MCU Peter’s relationship to Tony is grounded in the fact that Tony just shows up one day and essentially taps him to join the Avengers. Bruce by contrast initially tosses Terry out on his ear, and when Terry turns up seeking justice for his father Bruce can’t offer him anything but ‘go ask the cops for help’, and when that goes exactly as poorly as Terry said it would, Terry breaks into the manor steals the Batsuit and goes to stop Powers himself. Terry has active agency in his own choice to be a hero, which helps define his relationship with Bruce and to heroism. While MCU Peter was doing his own superheroics prior to Tony showing up in Civil War (not that he ever does much of that in future movies) his relationship to Tony is defined by Peter’s dependence on him and his quest for Tony(/the Avengers)’s approval. And because they don’t even bother name drop Uncle Ben or flashback to him, we’re left with the impression that the main thing driving MCU Peter is that quest for approval. His motivations are never more complexly explored, and we don’t even really see him just running around Queens stopping muggings or car crashes or anything that hints he enjoys or feels the need to actually help people.
And I think that gets into the final and most important difference between the two. Gotham not only needs Batman, it visibly and obviously and terribly needsBatman. Batman Beyond leans into this because decades without a Batman have left Gotham a cyperbunk dystopian hellscape. The city needs someone to stand up to the darkness, to be a symbol of hope, to be aspirational. Terry taking up that mantel means fighting supervillains, yes- but mostly it means doing what the original Batman did. Solving murders, stopping muggings, rescuing people from burning buildings or fighting off street gangs like the Jokerz.
But even in the earliest MCU movies, New York only needs superheroes when the current world ending threat shows up. Otherwise the city is all bright shinny clean streets filled with haplessly content citizens. This is the only reason that Vision’s position of 'Our very strength invites challenge’ argument in Civil War makes any sense- because the only purpose of these Superheroes is usually to fight a threat they where somehow responsible for creating. And this problem hits 'friendly neighborhood Spiderman’ the hardest because he only has a responsibility to use his great power to solve problems, if their are problems in need of solving. Most of Peter Parker’s (and Miles Morales’s, Gwen Stacy’s, or any other Spiderperson’s) day is not fighting alien armies or netherworld gods. It’s stopping break ins, rescuing people from fires, or other small scale local threats, that none the less benefit from someone with his abilities to make them better. Either New York in the MCU is an ideal utopian city where the police have everything handled apparently (which ha) or Peter is apparently not interested in stopping bad things from happening. He spends so much of the first movie basically begging Tony to give him superhero things to do, not realizing that he could go outside and find people that need help on his own.
In conclusion MCU Peter Parker isn’t 'regular Peter Parker but not an underdog’, or even 'Miles Morales but white’. He’s 'Terry McGinnis but without any agency in his own heroism’.
I keep doing this weird trick to myself where I’ll find a recipe for a new type of rice and beans and decide to try making it from dried beans like the recipe suggests, only to realize halfway through the process that whatever is wrong with my brain makes waiting for dried beans to cook absolutely harrowing
The thing about black beans is that if you, at any point, think “surely they must be cooked by now,” no, they’re not
This is an excellent article. It talks about the psychology of tyranny, the history of resistance and the paths we have to take to rescue each other and recover.
gen z has to reckon with its radicalization problem. you are not a morally pure and superior generation of youth come to save the world, your men and boys are radicalized at an unprecedented level and you ignore it because it’s too hard to address but you have to. these boys are in your classes, they date your friends, you know them and you cannot continue to pretend this is an “old white guy” problem
girls are contributing, too. the coquette aesthetic, the “i don’t want to girlboss i want a man to pay my bills”, girlmath girljob girlmoney. it’s a joke, it’s clothes, it’s whatever, i get it but it is driving a mentality of traditional gender roles and you know you’re joking but your boyfriend doesn’t. your kid brother doesn’t. you have to stop this shit it is a contributing factor
