Anyway, who says "no" to this trade proposal?

If you didn't understand this thread, here's some context.
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199
BruttoNostra wrote:Easy "No" for Warriors, unless they get a few unprotected FRPs for eating up the contracts of those slow unatlethical euros while giving up 7'3 Kuminga
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
GSWFan1994 wrote:If Bill Simmons calls himself "the Pablo Picasso of the Trade Machine", then I'm the Rob Liefeld of the Trade Machine.
AussieCeltic wrote:The General Board says no.
Take it to the Trade Board Rob