GN and Ninja are documented here:
[TOC]
List all files read (or executed) by an action as inputs
.
- It is not enough to have inputs listed by dependent targets. They must be listed directly by targets that use them, or added by a depfile.
- Non-system Python imports are inputs! For scripts that import such modules,
use
action_with_pydeps
to ensure all dependent Python files are captured as inputs.
To understand why actions must list all inputs directly, you need to
understand ninja's "restat" directive, which is used for all GN action()
s.
From https://ninja-build.org/manual.html:
if present, causes Ninja to re-stat the command’s outputs after execution of the command. Each output whose modification time the command did not change will be treated as though it had never needed to be built. This may cause the output’s reverse dependencies to be removed from the list of pending build actions.
So, if your action depends on target "X", and "X" does not change its outputs when rebuilt, then ninja will not bother to rebuild your target.
For action inputs that are not computable during "gn gen", actions can write depfiles (.d files) to add additional input files as dependencies for subsequent builds. They are relevant only for incremental builds since they won't exist for the initial build.
- Depfiles should not list files that GN already lists as
inputs
.- Besides being redundant, listing them also makes it harder to remove inputs, since removing them from GN does not immediately remove them from depfiles.
- Stale paths in depfiles can cause ninja to complain of circular dependencies in some cases.
- Use
action_helpers.write_depfile()
to write these.
"gn analyze" is used by bots to run only affected tests and build only affected targets. Try it out locally via:
echo "compute_inputs_for_analyze = true" >> out/Debug/args.gn
gn analyze //out/Debug <(echo '{
"files": ["//BUILD.gn"],
"test_targets": ["//base"],
"additional_compile_targets":[]}') result.txt; cat result.txt
- For analyze to work properly, GN must know about all inputs.
- Inputs added by depfiles are not available to "gn analyze".
- When paths listed in a target's depfile are listed as
inputs
to a dependent target, analyze will be correct.- Example: An
AndroidManifest.xml
file is an input to anandroid_library()
and is included in anandroid_apk()
's depfile.gn analyze
will know that a change to the file will require the APK to be rebuilt, because the file is marked as an input to the library, and the library is a dep of the APK.
- Example: An
- When paths listed in a target's depfile are not listed as
inputs
to a dependent target, a few options exist:- Rather than putting the inputs in a depfile, force users of your template
to list them, and then have your action re-compute them and assert that
they were correct.
jinja_template()
does this.
- Rather than putting the inputs in a depfile, compute them beforehand and
save them to a text file. Have your template Use
read_file()
to read them in.action_with_pydeps()
does this.
- Continue using a depfile, but use an
exec_script()
to compute them whencompute_inputs_for_analyze
is set.grit()
does this.
- Rather than putting the inputs in a depfile, force users of your template
to list them, and then have your action re-compute them and assert that
they were correct.
- When paths listed in a target's depfile are listed as
Do not list files as outputs
unless they are important. Outputs are important
if they are:
- used as an input by another target, or
- are roots in the dependency graph (e.g. binaries, apks, etc).
Example:
- An action runs a binary that creates an output as well as a log file. Do not list the log file as an output.
Rationale:
- Inputs and outputs are a node's public API on the build graph. Not listing "implementation detail"-style outputs prevents other targets from depending on them as inputs.
- Not listing them also helps to minimize the size of the build graph (although this would be noticeable only for frequently used templates).
Option 1: To make outputs visible in codesearch (e.g. generated sources):
- use
$target_gen_dir/$target_name.$EXTENSION
.
Option 2: Otherwise (for binary files):
- use
$target_out_dir/$target_name.$EXTENSION
.
Option 3: For outputs that are required at runtime (e.g. runtime_deps), options 1 & 2 do not work because they are not archived in builder/tester bot configurations. In this case:
- use
$root_out_dir/gen.runtime
or$root_out_dir/obj.runtime
.
Example:
# This .json file is used at runtime and thus cannot go in target_gen_dir.
_target_dir_name = rebase_path(get_label_info(":$target_name", "dir"), "//")
_output_path = "$root_out_dir/gen.runtime/$_target_dir_name/$target_name.json"
Option 4: For outputs that map 1:1 with executables, and whose paths cannot be derived at runtime:
- use
$root_build_dir/YOUR_NAME_HERE/$target_name
.
Examples:
# Wrapper scripts for apks:
_output_path = "$root_build_dir/bin/$target_name"
# Metadata for apks. Used by binary size tools.
_output_path = "$root_build_dir/size-info/${invoker.name}.apk.jar.info"
Outputs should be atomic and take advantage of restat=1
.
- Make outputs atomic by writing to temporary files and then moving them to
their final location.
- Rationale: An interrupted write can leave a file with an updated timestamp and corrupt contents. Ninja looks only at timestamps.
- Do not overwrite an existing output with identical contents.
- Rationale:
restat=1
is a ninja feature enabled for all actions that short-circuits a build when output timestamps do not change. This feature is the reason that the total number of build steps sometimes decreases when building..
- Rationale:
- Use
action_helpers.atomic_output()
to perform both of these techniques.
Actions should be deterministic in order to avoid hard-to-reproduce bugs. Given identical inputs, they should produce byte-for-byte identical outputs.
- Some common mistakes:
- Depending on filesystem iteration order.
- Writing absolute paths in outputs.
- Writing timestamps in files (or in zip entries).
- Tip: Use
zip_helpers.py
when writing.zip
files.
- Tip: Use
Chromium GN files follow GN's Style Guide with a few additions.
- Prefer writing new Python scripts that do what you want over
composing multiple separate actions within a template.
- Fewer targets makes for a simpler build graph.
- GN logic and build logic winds up much simpler.
Bad:
template("generate_zipped_sources") {
generate_files("${target_name}__gen") {
...
outputs = [ "$target_gen_dir/$target_name.temp" ]
}
zip(target_name) {
deps = [ ":${target_name}__gen" ]
inputs = [ "$target_gen_dir/$target_name.temp" ]
outputs = [ invoker.output_zip ]
}
}
Good:
template("generate_zipped_sources") {
action(target_name) {
script = "generate_and_zip.py"
...
outputs = [ invoker.output_zip ]
}
}
Targets that are not relevant to users of your template should be named as:
${target_name}__$something
.
Example:
template("my_template") {
action("${target_name}__helper") {
...
}
action(target_name) {
deps = [ ":${target_name}__helper" ]
...
}
}
This scheme ensures that subtargets defined in templates do not conflict with top-level targets.
You can restrict what targets can depend on one another using visibility.
When writing templates, with multiple intermediate targets, visibility
should
only be applied to the final target (the one named target_name
). Applying only
to the final target ensures that the invoker-provided visibility does not
prevent intermediate targets from depending on each other.
Example:
template("my_template") {
# Do not forward visibility here.
action("${target_name}__helper") {
# Do not forward visibility here.
...
}
action(target_name) {
# Forward visibility here.
forward_variables_from(invoker, [ "visibility" ])
deps = [ ":${target_name}__helper" ]
...
}
}
Prefix variables within templates and targets with an underscore. For example:
template("example") {
_outer_sources = invoker.extra_sources
source_set(target_name) {
_inner_sources = invoker.sources
sources = _outer_sources + _inner_sources
}
}
This convention conveys that sources
is relevant to source_set
, while
_outer_sources
and _inner_sources
are not.
Pass arguments to targets by assigning them directly within target definitions.
When a GN template goes to resolve invoker.FOO
, GN will look in all enclosing
scopes of the target's definition. It is hard to figure out where invoker.FOO
is coming from when it is not assigned directly within the target definition.
Bad:
template("hello") {
script = "..."
action(target_name) {
# This action will see "script" from the enclosing scope.
}
}
Good:
template("hello") {
action(target_name) {
script = "..." # This is equivalent, but much more clear.
}
}
Exception: testonly
and visibility
can be set in the outer scope so that
they are implicitly passed to all targets within a template.
This is okay:
template("hello") {
testonly = true # Applies to all nested targets.
action(target_name) {
script = "..."
}
}
Using [forward_variables_from()] is encouraged, but special care needs to be
taken when forwarding "*"
. The variables testonly
and visibility
should
always be listed explicitly in case they are assigned in an enclosing
scope.
See this bug for more a full example.
To make this easier, //build/config/BUILDCONFIG.gn
defines:
TESTONLY_AND_VISIBILITY = [ "testonly", "visibility" ]
Example usage:
template("action_wrapper") {
action(target_name) {
forward_variables_from(invoker, "*", TESTONLY_AND_VISIBILITY)
forward_variables_from(invoker, TESTONLY_AND_VISIBILITY)
...
}
}
If your template defines multiple targets, be careful to apply testonly
to
both, but visibility
only to the primary one (so that the primary one is not
prevented from depending on the other ones).
Example:
template("template_with_multiple_targets") {
action("${target_name}__helper") {
forward_variables_from(invoker, [ "testonly" ])
...
}
action(target_name) {
forward_variables_from(invoker, TESTONLY_AND_VISIBILITY)
...
}
}
An alternative would be to explicitly set visibility
on all inner targets,
but doing so tends to be tedious and has little benefit.
Useful ninja flags when developing build rules:
ninja -v
- log the full command-line of every target.ninja -v -n
- log the full command-line of every target without having to wait for a build.ninja -w dupbuild=err
- fail if multiple targets have the same output.ninja -d keeprsp
- prevent ninja from deleting response files.ninja -n -d explain
- print why ninja thinks a target is dirty.ninja -j1
- execute only one command at a time.