Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System Table with scope "OnPrem" #24868

Open
DanielSeiler opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

System Table with scope "OnPrem" #24868

DanielSeiler opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
extensibility-enhancement New feature or request related to extensibility Integration GitHub request for Integration area internal Internal pull request. Not a product change.

Comments

@DanielSeiler
Copy link

DanielSeiler commented Sep 20, 2023

For the system table "Data Sensitivity" (table 2000000159) the scope is set to "OnPrem". This does not make sense because the table is also used in the BC Online version and would therefore have to be used in the extension development.

We have block and delete reports that need to access the "Data Sensitivity" data.
Also, we cannot migrate the table with the OnPrem data. Filling it again manually is not proportionate.

Please change the Scrope of this System table.

@DanielSeiler DanielSeiler changed the title System Table with scrope "OnPrem" System Table with scope "OnPrem" Sep 20, 2023
@JakovljevicDusan JakovljevicDusan added the extensibility-enhancement New feature or request related to extensibility label Sep 20, 2023
@JesperSchulz JesperSchulz added the internal Internal pull request. Not a product change. label Jun 18, 2024
@JesperSchulz JesperSchulz added the Integration GitHub request for Integration area label Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
extensibility-enhancement New feature or request related to extensibility Integration GitHub request for Integration area internal Internal pull request. Not a product change.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants