In this paper, we report on using the interactive theorem prover Lean to bridge the gap between safety arguments and rigorous model-based reasoning.

In this paper, we report on using the interactive theorem prover Lean to bridge the gap between safety arguments and rigorous model-based reasoning.

In this paper, we report on using the interactive theorem prover Lean to bridge the gap between safety arguments and rigorous model-based reasoning. We generate ...

One method of mitigating reasoning errors in ACs is to formalize the AC's strategies so that they can be validated by a theorem prover [15] .

This paper generates formal, modelbased machine-checked AC arguments, taking advantage of the traceability between model and safety artifacts, ...

TL;DR: In this paper, the interactive theorem prover Lean is used to bridge the gap between safety arguments and rigorous model-based reasoning, ...

We present ForeMoSt, our tool-supported framework for rigorously validating AC strategies using the Lean theorem prover.

近几十年来，使用模型驱动工程(MDE)技术开发的网络物理系统在安全关键领域变得无处不在。安全保证案例(ACs)是结构化的论证，旨在全面表明此类系统是安全的;然而，在AC论证 ...

Nov 30, 2022 · ACs are often model-based, meaning that a model of the system is a primary subject of the argument. ACs use reasoning steps called strategies to ...

Dec 6, 2021 · This work expands on the use of Lean to automatically validate fragments of ACs, identifies challenges faced by AC developers who wish the leverage theorem ...