A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for rigid registration
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › ...
This protocol estimates a similarity measure's capture range, the number, location and extent of local optima, and the accuracy and distinctiveness of the ...
Abstract—The accuracy and robustness of a registration method depend on a number of factors, such as imaging modality, image.
The idea behind the proposed evaluation protocol is to estimate some important properties of similarity measures locally by systematically displacing individual ...
Skerl, D., Likar, B. and Pernus, F. (2006) A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for rigid registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 25,
People also ask
How do you evaluate similarity measures?
What are similarity measures for image registration?
What are the properties of similarity measures?
Darko Skerl, Bostjan Likar, Franjo Pernus: A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for rigid registration. IEEE Trans.
In this paper, we describe a protocol to quantitatively evaluate the behaviour of similarity measures. Registered MR/CT images of the spine and MR/MR brain ...
In this paper we propose a protocol for the evaluation of similarity measures for non-rigid registration. The protocol is feasible for the evaluation of ...
The most appropriate similarity measure was the asymmetric multi-feature mutual information (AMMI). Conclusions: The evaluation protocol proved to be a valuable ...
We show that the protocol is feasible for the evaluation of similarity measures that are based on a set of regularly or irregularly distributed corre- sponding ...
In this paper, we describe a protocol to quantitatively evaluate the behaviour of similarity measures. Registered MR/CT images of the spine and MR/MR brain ...