Dec 27, 2007 · To estimate Q, we take a matrix of raw pair frequencies originally assembled for the calculation of BLOSUM matrices [13, 14]. These matrices are ...
To do that, we revisit the original construction of BLOSUM matrices, and re-interpret them as mutation probability matrices. These probabilities are then used ...
Dec 27, 2007 · These probabilities are then used as background frequencies in the revised residue conservation measure. Conclusion: We show that joint entropy ...
Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited. ... Evolutionary trace report_maker: a new type of service for comparative analysis ...
Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited. BMC Bioinformatics, 8 (2007), p. 488. Google Scholar. 121. R.C. Lua, O. Lichtarge.
The same as... Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited. Article. Full-text available. Feb 2007. Ivana Mihalek ...
Jul 21, 2010 · Mihalek I, Res I, Lichtarge O: Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8: 488 ...
People also ask
How do you interpret the BLOSUM score?
What does the 62 in BLOSUM62 mean?
What is the difference between PAM and BLOSUM?
What is conservation score?
Jun 6, 2023 · ∙ Reš, I. ∙ Lichtarge, O. Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8:488. Crossref.
Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited · Biology, Computer Science. BMC Bioinformatics · 2007.
Feb 15, 2021 · We interrogate the evolutionary history of the entire SARS-CoV-2 proteome to identify evolutionarily conserved functional sites that can inform the search for ...