We did classroom observations of students over a period of ten weeks and thirteen TPS activities. We determined patterns of student engagement in the three phases using a real-time classroom observation protocol that we developed and validated. We found that 83% of students on average were fully or mostly engaged.
Mar 18, 2019 · We found that 83% of students on average were fully or mostly engaged. Predominant behaviors displayed were writing the solution to the problem ...
In this study, we investigate the quantity and quality of student engagement during Think-Pair-Share - an active learning method implemented in a large CS1 ...
Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement · Aditi Kothiyal, Rwitajit Majumdar, +1 author. Sridhar V. Iyer · Published in ...
People also ask
What are the effects of Think-Pair-Share?
How effective is Think-Pair-Share?
What is the impact of Think-Pair-Share model on mathematics learning in elementary schools?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of Think-Pair-Share?
We performed a quasi-experimental study and found that students who learned via TPS performed significantly better on a post-test than students who learned the ...
Our research team performed a quasi-experimental study and found that students who learned via TPS performed significantly better on a post-test than students ...
Mar 18, 2019 · We performed a quasi-experimental study and found that students who learned via TPS performed significantly better on a post-test than students ...
Jun 25, 2014 · TPS results in high student engagement in a large CS1 class. In ... of Think-Pair-Share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement ...
Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement · Peer instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? · How we ...
Feb 18, 2023 · This study investigated the effects of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) strategy and the Conventional method on students' performance and attitude to essay writing.