Sep 26, 2018 · Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices. Original Paper; Published: 26 September 2018. Volume ...
In fact, ambiguous QRPs were perceived as categorically defensible when given a justifiable motive. This suggests scientists are sensitive to contextual factors ...
In fact, ambiguous QRPs were perceived as categorically defensible when given a justifiable motive. This suggests scientists are sensitive to contextual factors ...
People also ask
What are questionable research practices?
What is the most commonly reported form of QRP questionable research practice that occurs with respect to conducting research?
The current study sought to determine research scientists' sensitivity to various justifications for engaging in behaviors typically considered to be ...
The current study sought to determine research scientists' sensitivity to various justifications for engaging in behaviors typically considered to be ...
Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices · List of references · Publications that cite this publication.
, Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices. ; Sacco, Donald F. ;. , ISSN: 1353-3452 , 1471-5546; DOI: 10.1007 ...
... research integrity. Technology Ethics. 26. Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices. with Donald F. Sacco and ...
Donald F. Sacco , Mitch Brown, Samuel V. Bruton : Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices.
Oct 14, 2024 · Our findings indicate that contract type, career stage, academic field, adherence to scientific norms and gender significantly predict QRP engagement.
Missing: Grounds Justifiable