The paper adds the one-counter one-way finite automaton [6] to the list of classical computing devices having quantum counterparts more powerful in some cases.
Oct 24, 2001 · Abstract. The paper adds the one-counter one-way finite automaton [6] to the list of classical computing devices having quantum counterparts ...
Oct 22, 2024 · The question of whether quantum real-time one-counter automata (rtQ1CAs) can outperform their probabilistic counterparts has been open for more ...
Kravtsev introduced 1-way quantum 1-counter automata (1Q1CAs), and showed that several non-context-free languages can be recognized by bounded error 1Q1CAs.
Missing: versus | Show results with:versus
Mar 30, 2012 · Given the input to the automata, it progresses to the next state based on the collapse of the superposition from measurement. This collapsed ...
However, it has been still unclear why quantum computers are so powerful. In this context, it is worth considering simpler models suchas finite automata.
Missing: versus | Show results with:versus
This means that 1QFAs are strictly less powerful than classical 1-way deterministic finite automata. This weakness comes from the restriction of reversibility.
May 1, 2011 · The question of whether quantum real-time one-counter automata (rtQ1CAs) can outperform their probabilistic counterparts has been open for more than a decade.
Missing: versus | Show results with:versus
People also ask
What are the two types of finite automaton?
Can a finite automata have multiple final states?
What is the difference between finite automaton and regular expression?
What is the difference between finite automata and transition system?
The question of whether quantum real-time one-counter automata (rtQ1CAs) can outperform their probabilistic counterparts has been open for more than a decade.
It is proved that 2Q1CAs are at least as powerful as classical two-way deterministic one-counter automata (2D1C as), that is, every language L recognizable ...
Missing: versus | Show results with:versus